Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Killinghall Church of England Primary School

Inspected 29 Sept 2022 · published 22 Nov 2022 · URN 121569

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    29 Sept 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    Chris Baines, Philippa Kermotschuk

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Outstanding

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    HG3 2DW

  • Name on report verified

    Killinghall Church of England Primary School

  • URN verified

    121569

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.

  • OverallGood
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsOutstanding
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationGood

66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+62Positivemore positive than 59% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseexcellentstronghigh expectationsambitiousskilledenjoyvery wellconsistently
Criticismnot alwaysconcernsnot consistentlynot ambitiousnot clearnot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1153w+64
  • Safeguarding97w+32

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,215
about usual (typical 1098)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 58, typical 55
Average sentence
13 words
Next steps
3
typical 4
Hedged sentences
22%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 64%Safeguarding 5%About the inspection 31%

Full report text

Inspection of Killinghall Church of England Primary School Otley Road, Killinghall, Harrogate, North Yorkshire HG3 2DW

p.1

Inspection dates: 28 and 29 September 2022

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Outstanding Previous inspection grade Good 28 and 29 September 2022

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders have created a highly inclusive school community where pupils are valued. As a result, pupils are happy and feel safe in the school. Leaders have high expectations for pupils. For the most part, pupils rise to these expectations and achieve well. Children get off to an excellent start in the early years.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Most pupils behave well. They show kindness and consideration for others. Bullying is not a problem in the school. Pupils know that they can talk to any of the adults in school if they are worried about something. They are confident that adults will act quickly.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Over recent years, both staff and pupils have faced some difficult challenges in addition to the COVID-19 pandemic. The number of pupils on the school’s roll has increased significantly and the school building was severely damaged by a flood earlier in the year. All members of the school community have demonstrated high levels of resilience in the face of these setbacks. Pupils show commitment to their education. They look forward to taking on the different roles and responsibilities available to them, such as becoming a digital leader, a member of the school council or a rainbow ambassador. Pupils have a strong sense of equality and tolerance. They are well-equipped for life in modern Britain.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils can talk about their aspirations for the future. They know which subjects they need to do well in to enable them to achieve these aspirations.

p.2

better?

Leaders have designed an ambitious curriculum for most subjects, particularly art and history. The curriculum in early years is sequenced well. This helps children to build their knowledge step by step. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the curriculum for some subjects is still in development. Sometimes, the work required of pupils is less ambitious than leaders’ curriculum plans. When pupils make mistakes, teachers do not always correct them. This means some pupils continue to make the same mistakes repeatedly.

p.2

better?

The teaching of phonics and early reading is high quality. Skilled staff deliver a carefully chosen phonics programme. Letter formation is taught alongside sounds. Teachers do not always check that pupils are writing letters correctly. In the early years, there are lots of opportunities for children to practise the sounds they know. Pupils’ reading books match the sounds they know. Most pupils talk enthusiastically about reading. They enjoy visiting the school library and refer to library books as ‘fun books’. Extra support is in place for pupils who are not learning to read as quickly as they should. This support enables them to catch up with their peers.

p.2

better?

Leaders have embedded the mathematics curriculum across the school. It is particularly strong in the early years, where children can engage with number in lots 28 and 29 September 2022

p.2

3

of different ways. For example, they can find stars in the sand pit using magnets and compare who has found more and who has fewer. Teachers use the same teaching strategies, such as the use of ‘Flashback 4’, to revisit prior learning. This helps pupils to know and remember more. In key stage 2 mathematics lessons, pupils can choose their own ‘challenge’, and most pupils make sensible choices. Teachers check what pupils know, and they use this information to plan future learning. Sometimes teachers do not correct basic mistakes, such as pupils writing numbers the wrong way round.

p.3

3

Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) have full access to the curriculum. Teachers make adaptations to activities and resources to ensure that pupils with SEND learn alongside their peers. Skilled support staff contribute greatly to the inclusive culture that exists within the school. Targets for some pupils with SEND are too broad. This may make it difficult for pupils to achieve their targets. Leaders do not fully have a system in place to identify and monitor pupils with potential SEND before they are added to the SEND register. In the early years, however, staff do spot children with potential SEND. They receive timely support to meet their needs.

p.3

3

Children in the early years do extremely well. The curriculum is highly ambitious. Teachers and staff know what the children can do very well. Staff make skilled use of questioning to develop children’s thinking. Activities are carefully designed to enable children to practise and refine skills, particularly their physical and social skills. Warm, nurturing relationships exist between staff and children.

p.3

3

Most pupils behave well in lessons and have positive attitudes to learning. However, in some classrooms, teachers’ expectations are not high enough. Some pupils say they find this frustrating. At playtime, most pupils play cooperatively with each other. Behaviour in the early years is excellent. Children show high levels of self-control and sustained levels of concentration. They treat each other and their classroom environment with respect.

p.3

3

Leaders listen to pupils’ opinions. They provide opportunities for them to bring about change within the school. There are chances for pupils to play a part in the community through activities such as litter picks and charity events. A wide range of after-school clubs are on offer to all pupils, for example archery and karate. Pupils say they enjoy these.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

All staff and governors are trained to enable them to fulfil their safeguarding responsibilities well. Leaders are aware of local risks to pupils, such as county lines. Safeguarding records are accurately maintained. The headteacher is tenacious when following up concerns about pupils. Leaders make sure that pupils and their families get the support they need. Pupils have a strong understanding of how to stay safe 28 and 29 September 2022

p.3

4

online. Governors and leaders ensure that the right checks are in place before an adult starts to work at the school.

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Expectations of pupils are not consistently high across the school. In some classrooms, high expectations for behaviour have not been fully established. This means learning is occasionally disrupted and pupils say they find this frustrating. Leaders should ensure that all expectations for pupils’ behaviour are consistently high across the school.  The process by which pupils with SEND are identified and monitored before being added to the SEND register is not fully effective. This means that in some instances, it is not clear what has been done to monitor and support pupils prior to them being put on the SEND register. In addition, targets for some pupils with SEND are too broad. This means that it is hard for pupils to achieve their targets. Leaders should ensure that processes for identifying and monitoring pupils with SEND are consistently strong and that targets are precise.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 28 and 29 September 2022

p.4

School details

Inspection number 10228336 Type of school Primary

p.5

School details

Co-chairs of governing body Marion McCormick and Becky Morrell

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 20 June 2017, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school is a voluntary controlled Church of England school within the Diocese of Leeds. The most recent section 48 inspection of the school’s religious character took place in May 2016.  The school operates before- and after-school clubs.  There is no nursery provision at the school.  The school does not make use of any alternative provision.  The number of pupils on the school’s roll has increased significantly in recent years.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. 28 and 29 September 2022

p.5

6

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken this into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics, history and art. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors held meetings with the headteacher and their leadership team. Inspectors also met with subject leaders, the special educational needs and/or disabilities coordinator, one of the co-chairs and representatives of the governing body, the senior education adviser from the local authority and the schools adviser for the Diocese of Leeds.  Inspectors reviewed the curriculum for personal, social and health education and

p.6

6

relationships and sex education.  Inspectors observed pupils reading to familiar adults.  Inspectors observed the behaviour of pupils in lessons and during breaktimes.  Inspectors examined the single central record and looked at how safeguarding incidents are reported. Inspectors spoke to leaders, teachers, support staff, governors and pupils about the culture of safeguarding in the school.  Inspectors considered the responses made by parents to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View. This included any free-text responses. Inspectors also considered the responses to the staff survey.

p.6

Inspection team

Philippa Kermotschuk, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Chris Baines Ofsted Inspector 28 and 29 September 2022

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion