Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Brentnall Primary School

Inspected 22 Sept 2022 · published 21 Nov 2022 · URN 105893

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Jackie Stillings (lead), Moira Loftus

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    22 Sept 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    Jackie Stillings, Moira Loftus

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Inadequate

  • Early years verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Requires improvement

  • Quality of education verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    M7 4RP

  • Name on report verified

    Brentnall Primary School

  • URN verified

    105893

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
  • Early yearsInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentRequires improvement
  • Quality of educationInadequate

3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−48Criticalmore positive than 20% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisesuccessfuleffectiveeffectivelysafepositivelywell supportedenjoyhappy
Criticismweakfailedtoo manypoorweaknessesinadequatenot well prepareddecline

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1579w−52
  • Safeguarding83w−12

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,626
about usual (typical 1552)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 53, typical 53
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
6
typical 6
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 67%Safeguarding 4%About the inspection 29%

Full report text

Inspection of Brentnall Primary School Northumberland Street, Higher Broughton, Salford, Greater Manchester M7 4RP

p.1

Inspection dates: 21 and 22 September 2022

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Inadequate Early years provision Inadequate Previous inspection grade Good 21 and 22 September 2022

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders, and those responsible for governance, have failed pupils at this school. They have overseen the decline in the quality of education that pupils receive. The curriculum does not serve pupils, particularly those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), well. It is inadequate, narrow and unambitious. Pupils’ knowledge in many subjects, including in the early years, is not secure.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils with SEND, including those in the specially resourced provision for SEND (specially resourced provision), do not achieve well. This is because leaders and staff do not have high enough academic expectations of them. Leaders have not made sure that staff know how to adapt the delivery of the curriculum to meet the needs of pupils with SEND.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils told inspectors that leaders’ and staff’s expectations for their behaviour are now higher than in the past. Older pupils respond positively to these expectations. However, despite these improvements, some younger pupils find it hard to concentrate in lessons due to the high levels of noise from other pupils. This leads pupils to lose focus and to interrupt the learning of others. Pupils do not learn as well as they should.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Despite the inadequacies in the curriculum, pupils are safe at school. They can speak with staff about any worries that they may have. Pupils said that leaders take bullying seriously and resolve any issues quickly.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders ensure that pupils’ physical and emotional health is well supported. Pupils enjoy taking part in the many sports clubs on offer. They are happy in school. However, the wider opportunities to develop pupils’ character and interests are more limited. In addition, too many pupils do not attend school regularly enough to benefit from all that it has to offer to enhance their personal development.

p.2

better?

The standard of education at this school has declined considerably since the previous inspection. Pupils’ experience of school has been adversely affected by an unsettled period in leadership. The interim executive headteacher has quickly reviewed the school’s strengths and priorities for improvement. He has already begun to make important improvements. However, it is far too soon to see the impact of this interim leadership on pupils’ achievement.

p.2

better?

Pupils with SEND, including those in the specially resourced provision, do not get the help and support that they need with their learning. Leaders and teachers accurately identify pupils who may have SEND. However, staff are not trained sufficiently well to use the information that they receive about pupils with SEND to inform how they adapt the delivery of lessons. Teachers rely too much on teaching assistants to provide support for pupils with SEND. 21 and 22 September 2022

p.2

3

The curriculum for children and pupils with SEND, including those in the specially resourced provision, lacks ambition. It does not enable pupils to build up their knowledge over time. Added to this, many pupils with SEND and pupils who are disadvantaged are frequently absent from school. Although interim leaders are in the process of addressing this, their work has only recently started. As a result, the achievement of pupils with SEND is weak. They are not well prepared for the next stage of their education. Pupils with SEND get a poor deal.

p.3

3

The curriculum is not meeting pupils’ needs. In several subjects, leaders are unclear about the essential knowledge that pupils need to learn and the order in which this should be taught. Leaders have not been trained to design or deliver their curriculums well. Consequently, teachers do not understand how to shape their teaching so that pupils build their knowledge well over time. Pupils receive a disorganised learning experience. They do not gain the knowledge and skills that they need to be successful. Pupils’ achievement in too many subjects is insecure.

p.3

3

In a small number of subjects, leaders’ curriculum thinking is further along. These subject leaders have received sufficient training to lead their areas of responsibility. They have developed the expertise that they need to design and put in place a high- quality curriculum. In these subjects, leaders have identified the important content that pupils should learn, and ordered it logically. Pupils are able to build their knowledge well over time in these subjects.

p.3

3

The school’s reading curriculum is weak. Until very recently, staff have not been adequately trained to teach early reading. The reading books that teachers provide for pupils to practise their reading are not accurately matched to the sounds that pupils have learned. The reading curriculum is not coherently organised. This means that pupils do not build on reading skills they have learned before. Pupils have gaps in their reading knowledge.

p.3

3

New leaders have identified that staff do not develop children's communication and language skills well enough in the early years. However, staff in the early years lack the expertise that they need to improve this situation. They do not routinely introduce new vocabulary to children while they are engaged in activities. Staff miss opportunities to build children's knowledge. As a result, children in the early years are not well prepared for their next stage of education.

p.3

3

Pupils’ behaviour in lessons varies across the school, depending upon which class they are in. Many older pupils listen attentively and have positive attitudes to their learning. However, younger pupils find it difficult to settle into the routines of learning. This leads them to disrupt the learning of others.

p.3

3

Leaders make sure that pupils take part in activities to help to build up their resilience. This helps pupils to learn about the importance of mental health. However, pupils’ knowledge of values such as democracy are underdeveloped. This hinders pupils’ readiness for life in modern Britain. 21 and 22 September 2022

p.3

4

Over time, governors have not taken suitable steps to assure themselves of the accuracy of information given to them by senior leaders. Governors and leaders have failed to take purposeful action to improve the poor quality of education that pupils receive.

p.4

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.4

Safeguarding

Leaders make sure that staff receive regular safeguarding training. Staff know how to report concerns about a pupil’s safety or well-being. This helps leaders to identify and support pupils who may be at risk. Leaders act swiftly in partnership with external agencies to keep pupils safe, when required. Leaders are aware of potential local safeguarding risks.

p.4

Safeguarding

Pupils learn how to keep themselves safe. For instance, they know some of the risks associated with working and playing online.

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Governors have too readily accepted what leaders have told them. They do not understand the extent of the weaknesses at the school or the negative impact that this continues to have on the achievement of all pupils, including pupils with SEND and those in the specially resourced provision. Governors must ensure that they improve their oversight of the school so that they can hold leaders to account for their actions and the pace of improvement.  Until recently, leaders have not made the teaching of early reading a priority. This means that too many pupils do not get off to a good start in learning to read. They have gaps in their reading knowledge. Leaders should ensure that staff are expertly trained and that books are well matched to sounds that pupils have learned. Leaders should also ensure that the broader reading curriculum is well organised.  Many subject leaders have not been trained to design their subjects effectively.

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

These subject leaders do not have the skills or understanding to improve their subject curriculums. As a result, in many subjects, leaders have not thought about the most important knowledge that pupils need to learn and remember. Senior leaders must ensure that subject leaders are trained well to develop the curriculums in their subjects, so that staff are clear about the essential knowledge that pupils need to learn.  In line with weaknesses in their curriculum thinking, subject leaders have not trained staff to deliver the curriculum well. This means that too many pupils receive a disorganised learning experience. Pupils do not build a secure body of subject knowledge as a result. Senior leaders must ensure that subject leaders 21 and 22 September 2022

p.4

5

are sufficiently trained to support staff to implement their subject curriculums effectively.  Leaders have not acted swiftly enough to address the decline in pupils’ attendance and younger pupils’ attitudes to learning. Some pupils, particularly pupils with SEND and those who are disadvantaged, are frequently absent from school. Their learning is regularly disrupted as a result. Leaders must make certain that recently introduced behavioural expectations and attendance monitoring arrangements are effective, so that pupils behave well and attend school regularly.  The curriculum for children in the early years is weak. In particular, it does not support children to build their language and communication skills. As a result, children are not well prepared for their next stage in education. Leaders must, as a matter of urgency, review the curriculum so that children in the early years gain the essential knowledge that they need to be successful.

p.5

5

Leaders and those responsible for governance may not appoint early careers teachers before the next monitoring inspection.

p.5

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.5

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.5

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.5

Further information

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 21 and 22 September 2022

p.5

School details

Inspection number 10226300 Type of school Primary

p.6

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.6

School details

Website www.brentnallcommunityprimaryschool.c o.uk Date of previous inspection 8 March 2017, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.6

Information about this school

 There has been considerable turmoil in the leadership of the school since the time of the previous inspection.  An interim executive headteacher was appointed to lead the school in June 2022. This headteacher is also responsible for another school in the local authority.  A new chair of governors has been elected by the governing body since the school was last inspected.  The school has a specially resourced provision base for pupils with SEND. This specially resourced provision base has places for 12 pupils in key stage 2. At the time of the inspection, places were allocated to 10 pupils. Pupils’ primary need in this base is autistic spectrum disorder. All pupils have an education, health and care plan.  Leaders do not make use of any alternative provision. 21 and 22 September 2022

p.6

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.7

Information about this inspection

In accordance with section 44(1) of the Education Act 2005, His Majesty's Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires special measures because it is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the persons responsible for leading, managing or governing the school are not demonstrating the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school.

p.7

Information about this inspection

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors spoke with the executive headteacher, the head of school and other leaders in school. They spoke with a group of governors, including the chair of the governing body. Inspectors also spoke with a representative of the local authority.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in early reading, mathematics and history. They spoke with the curriculum leaders of these subject areas. Inspectors also visited lessons, looked at examples of pupils’ work, held discussions with teachers and talked with pupils.  Inspectors also spoke with leaders from other areas of the curriculum. They looked at pupils’ work and spoke with pupils.  An inspector listened to pupils read to an adult.  Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour at breaktimes and lunchtimes. They

p.7

Information about this inspection

observed pupils’ behaviour as they moved around the school.  Inspectors spoke with groups of pupils about their experiences at school  Inspectors spoke with parents and carers as they dropped their children off at school. They considered the responses to Ofsted Parent View. This included the free-text responses.  Inspectors also considered the responses to Ofsted's surveys for pupils and for staff.  Inspectors reviewed documentation and spoke to staff and to pupils about the systems in place to keep pupils safe.

p.7

Inspection team

Jackie Stillings, lead inspector His Majesty's Inspector

p.7

Inspection team

Moira Loftus Ofsted Inspector 21 and 22 September 2022

p.7

8

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

8

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

8

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

8

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

8

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion