Early years · Early years complaint outcome
Thrive Princes Dock
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
8 Nov 2022
- URN verified
EY424052
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 367
- longer than usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 41, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 14%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the¿Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 23 August 2022, we received concerns that the provider was not meeting some of these requirements.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 15 September 2022, we carried out a regulatory telephone call. On 20, 21 and 31 October 2022 we carried out further regulatory telephone calls and viewed documentation. We found the provider was not meeting some of the requirements and had taken action to put this right for some requirements but not others. The provider had made changes to risk assessments and procedures. The provider had also ensured that staff received training to be able to fully understand their roles and responsibilities. However, the provider was not meeting some of the other requirements. We have issued actions for the provider to take. The provider will be able to give parents further information about this. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Summary of outcome
• ensure that accurate records are written for all accidents or injuries to a child while in the care of the setting,
p.1
Summary of outcome
• ensure that the designated practitioner responsible for safeguarding children fully understands their role and responsibility, including in the event of an allegation being made against a member of staff.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 11 November 2022, the provider responded to the actions set. We found that the provider had reviewed their accident reporting procedure to minimise the risk of inaccuracy. We found that the provider had taken steps to improve their knowledge and understanding of the role of the designated practitioner responsible for safeguarding children. We are satisfied the provider has met the safeguarding and welfare actions raised. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.2
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.
p.2
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion