Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Bodiam Church of England Primary School

Inspected 14 Sept 2022 · URN 114529

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Vicky Matthews (lead), Kirstine Boon

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    14 Sept 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    Kirstine Boon, Vicky Matthews

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    TN32 5UH

  • Name on report verified

    Bodiam Church of England Primary School

  • URN verified

    114529

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+43Positivemore positive than 83% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoyhigh expectationsrespectfuleffectivelyconsistentlysuccessfulstrongsafe
Criticismnot alwaysnot yetweaknessesat riskgapsstrugglenot effectivenot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1109w+44
  • Safeguarding102w+28
  • What needs to improve31w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,215
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 55, typical 56
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 58%Safeguarding 5%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 35%

Full report text

Inspection of Bodiam Church of England Primary School Castle Road, Bodiam, Robertsbridge, East Sussex TN32 5UH

p.1

Inspection dates: 13 and 14 September 2022

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Good

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

Previous inspection grade Good 13 and 14 September 2022

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are happy and proud to belong to a school which is valued as an important part of the local community. Pupils enjoy learning and relish the many enrichment opportunities on offer. Adults take the time to get to know the pupils well. Parents appreciate the supportive relationships they and their children have with staff. Everyone describes the school as ‘one big family’.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders want pupils to ‘be the best that they can be’. However, this ambition is not currently being met. In some subjects, pupils do not yet benefit from a carefully sequenced curriculum that builds their knowledge over time.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Behaviour at the school is strong. Leaders have high expectations of behaviour and pupils know the ‘Golden Rules’. Relationships are warm and respectful. The school’s values of compassion, friendship and tolerance are woven through every aspect of the school. Pupils play well together. They are kind and polite to each other, adults and visitors.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils learn about looking after themselves, including how to keep themselves physically and mentally healthy. They feel safe and secure at school. Pupils understand what bullying is. While they do not think it is a problem at their school, they are right to be confident that staff would deal with any worries they had.

p.2

better?

Pupils do not learn as well as they should in some subjects. Until recently, leaders had not identified the important curriculum knowledge that pupils need to know. This means that teachers are not always clear about what they need to teach. Assessment and enquiry questions in some curriculum areas do not link to the knowledge that pupils have been taught. Teachers are not, therefore, always identifying gaps in learning and adapting the curriculum accordingly. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) do not achieve as well as they might. Leaders have not ensured that appropriate systems are in place to identify their needs and meet them in a timely way.

p.2

better?

Over time, leaders have not prioritised staff’s professional development. This means that staff are not equipped with the expertise needed to deliver the full breadth of the curriculum. This is particularly the case with early reading. There is not a consistent approach across the school because staff have not all had the necessary training to deliver the phonics and early reading curriculum effectively. Where staff have received relevant training and additional support, as is the case with the early years, the teaching of early reading is stronger. However, reading books are not always matched to the sounds that pupils know. This means that sometimes pupils struggle to read words because they have not been taught the phonics knowledge they need. Staff do not have the expertise they need to provide precise support to 13 and 14 September 2022

p.2

3

the weakest readers. Leaders are aware of these weaknesses and are taking appropriate steps to improve the early reading curriculum.

p.3

3

The curriculum for mathematics is stronger. Having been taught in the early years for some time, the published scheme of work has been gradually introduced across the school over the last year and is now delivered consistently well. Mathematical knowledge is sequenced to build over time. Pupils have lots of opportunities to learn about numbers as soon as they start in Reception. This is typical of the well- thought-out early years curriculum. Children enjoy the learning activities in the indoor and outdoor environments. Important skills and knowledge are sequenced over the year, and opportunities for pupils to revisit prior learning are planned for.

p.3

3

The personal development of pupils is a strength of the school. Leaders make sure that learning extends beyond the classroom. They prioritise enriching experiences for all pupils, including visits to the theatre, galleries and the zoo. Teachers take every opportunity to engage pupils in meaningful discussion. Pupils learn about responsibility from their first day and to be respectful of the opinions of others. There is an active school council and a wealth of additional roles that pupils eagerly apply for. Leaders listen to what pupils have to say and value their opinions.

p.3

3

The newly appointed interim executive headteacher has an accurate view of what is needed to improve the school. He has clear plans to implement the necessary actions, drawing on support from the local authority and the diocese. He is well supported by senior leaders and governors, who have worked hard to stabilise the school during a difficult time. Leaders are unified in their determination to improve the quality of education. Work on curriculum design is underway but is too recent to have had the desired impact. Monitoring systems have been developed but are not yet in operation. Dedicated staff are enthusiastic about the positive changes that have already taken place and about leaders’ consideration of their well-being and workload as well as development.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders prioritise safeguarding training for all staff. They are vigilant with safer recruitment procedures. Governors check that the school’s safeguarding arrangements are implemented consistently.

p.3

Safeguarding

Staff are clear about their safeguarding responsibilities. They know the pupils and their families well. Staff know how to identify pupils who need help or are at risk of abuse. Leaders seek the support of outside agencies when necessary.

p.3

Safeguarding

Pupils know how to keep safe online and understand how to keep themselves safe beyond their local community. Parents who responded to Ofsted Parent View have confidence that children are safe in school.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Leadership of curriculum design and delivery has not been effective over time. Consequently, pupils do not learn well in all subjects. Leaders should ensure that component knowledge is sequenced to reach agreed end points in all subjects and assure themselves that the revised curriculum is being implemented as intended.  Until recently, leaders have not strategically planned for the professional development of staff. This means that staff do not have the knowledge and skills they need to teach all subjects well. Leaders should ensure that staff are well trained to deliver the full breadth of the curriculum effectively.  Not all staff have the expertise needed to teach early reading well. As a result, some pupils do not learn to read well enough. Leaders should ensure that staff receive appropriate training and development to skilfully support all pupils to be successful readers.  The school does not meet the needs of pupils with SEND well enough. Leaders

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

should ensure that systems are in place for the timely identification of pupils’ additional needs and that they get the precise support they need to be successful learners.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 13 and 14 September 2022

p.4

School details

Inspection number 10242093 Type of school Primary

p.5

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Chairs of governing body Beverley Waldis Phillip Hinde Headteacher Jon Goulding

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 5 July 2017, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school is currently led by an interim executive headteacher, appointed in June 2022.  The school is part of the Riverside Federation with Etchingham Church of England Primary School. The two schools share one governing body.  There have been significant recent changes in governance, including two newly appointed co-chairs.  The religious character of the school was inspected under section 48 of the Education Act 2005 in October 2016. The religious character was judged to be outstanding.  The school does not currently use any alternative provision.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. 13 and 14 September 2022

p.5

6

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors met with the interim executive headteacher, the head of school and the special educational needs and/or disabilities coordinator.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: reading, mathematics, science and history. For each deep dive, inspectors met with subject leaders, considered curriculum planning, visited a sample of lessons, talked with teachers, spoke to pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors also heard some pupils read and talked to pupils across the school about their love of reading.  The inspection team also looked at curriculum plans for additional subjects and reviewed pupils’ work, including in personal, social and health education.

p.6

6

 The lead inspector met with the two co-chairs of the school’s governing body and spoke with representatives from the local authority and the Diocese of Chichester education department.  Inspectors reviewed a range of documents, including the school’s self-evaluation, improvement plans, minutes of recent governor body meetings and records of visits to the school by the local authority and diocese.  The views of staff and pupils were gathered through informal discussions.  The inspection team considered the views of staff through their responses to Ofsted’s confidential staff survey. They also met with staff during the inspection.  Inspectors reviewed 29 responses to the parent survey, including the free-text comments that parents made. Inspectors also spoke to parents and carers at the end of the first day of the inspection.  To inspect the school’s safeguarding arrangements, inspectors talked with pupils

p.6

6

and staff and reviewed the school’s policies, documents and procedures, including records of recruitment checks. The lead inspector met with the school’s designated leader for safeguarding. Throughout the inspection, inspectors considered and checked the culture of safeguarding within the school.

p.6

Inspection team

Vicky Matthews, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Kirstine Boon Ofsted Inspector 13 and 14 September 2022

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion