Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Roman Road Primary School

Inspected 7 Jul 2022 · published 8 Nov 2022 · URN 108376

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Mary Cook (lead), Katie Spurr

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    7 Jul 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    Katie Spurr, Mary Cook

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Requires improvement

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    NE10 8SA

  • Name on report verified

    Roman Road Primary School

  • URN verified

    108376

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentRequires improvement
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−18Mixedmore positive than 61% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoyoutstandingconsistentlyhigh expectationssafetimelyeffectivelove
Criticismnot effectiveat riskunacceptablegapsrisk of harmincompletefaileddo not know

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1373w−6
  • Safeguarding433w−46

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,775
about usual (typical 1552)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 50, typical 53
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
6
typical 6
Hedged sentences
14%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 59%Safeguarding 19%About the inspection 22%

Full report text

Inspection of Roman Road Primary School Leam Lane Estate, Felling, Gateshead, Tyne and Wear NE10 8SA

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Inadequate Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Outstanding

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

Roman Road Primary School was last inspected six years ago and judged ‘Outstanding’ under a previous inspection framework. This reflected the school’s overall effectiveness under the inspection framework in use at the time.

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

From then, until November 2020, the school was exempted by law from routine inspection, so there has been a longer gap than usual between inspections. Judgements in the report are based on the current inspection framework and also reflect changes that may have happened at any point since the last inspection. 5 to 7 July 2022

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders, including governors, have not ensured that safeguarding is effective. The welfare of long-term absentees is unknown. Referrals to children’s social care, for example about possible child sexual exploitation, are not made in a timely manner. Some behaviour records on the school’s management information system are incomplete.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Most pupils behave well at Roman Road Primary School. A few pupils’ poor behaviour, including bullying, disrupts the education of others. As a result, some pupils do not feel as happy, safe and secure as they should in school. Leaders have not implemented relationships education in a timely manner. Older pupils have not learned about healthy and unhealthy relationships, and unacceptable peer-on-peer harassment. As a result, these pupils are ill-equipped to identify, report and deal with unhealthy relationships.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders acknowledge the importance of each and every child learning to read. The school’s chosen phonics scheme is delivered consistently well. Gaps in pupils’ knowledge caused during the COVID-19 pandemic are closing rapidly. At Roman Road, pupils enjoy reading. The content of the curriculum in some other subjects is not as well developed as it is in phonics.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Children in the early years love coming to school. They enjoy learning and playing with their friends. Staff make learning fun. Routines are established early. Adults encourage the development of children’s communication, language and literacy by talking with the children, asking them questions and listening to their answers attentively. Children look forward to ‘Wild Wednesdays’ when they learn in the school’s nature area.

p.2

better?

The personal, social and health education (PHSE) curriculum does not address risk- taking behaviour sufficiently. Recently, an external provider gave talks about online safety to Years 5 and 6. Off-line grooming and the risk of criminal exploitation has not been explored to a similar extent. There is a reliance on ad hoc reactive lessons and assemblies to teach PHSE. This means important areas of learning, including about protected characteristics, are missed. Relationship education is not taught to the extent that it should be at key stage 2.

p.2

better?

Most pupils behave well in school. A few pupils have aggressive outbursts. Leaders have not ensured that staff are up to date with positive handling techniques. This puts staff and pupils at risk. Behaviour plans for individual pupils make use of long- term therapy and counselling. However, in a few cases, there is an over-reliance on the headteacher being available to de-escalate behaviour. Sometimes, individual pupils are with the headteacher several times in one day, returning to class in between. They miss out on key learning in class. 5 to 7 July 2022

p.2

3

The effectiveness of behaviour strategies cannot be checked as the school’s records are incomplete. Leaders cannot accurately analyse whole school or individual pupil’s behaviours patterns. Governors do not have full knowledge of the trends in behaviour incidents over time. They are unable to fulfil their support and challenge role effectively.

p.3

3

Senior leaders prioritise the teaching of basic skills, such as reading and mathematics, across the school. There is highly consistent teaching of a well- structured phonics scheme. Staff share the same high expectations of all pupils in reading. In both mathematics and phonics, pupils enjoy their learning and remember what they have been taught. The curriculum is adapted to ensure pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) work alongside their peers. The subject leaders are passionate, competent and guide other members of staff in what to teach and when. Pupils’ knowledge and understanding is checked in lessons and more formally on a regular basis. Pupils with gaps in their knowledge receive catch-up lessons.

p.3

3

Curriculum ambition, sequence and structure is variable in subjects beyond phonics and mathematics. In science, geography and history, pupils are not connecting their learning so that they remember more over time. Art is one of the stronger subjects. The curriculum leader suggests the artists to study from diverse backgrounds with different styles of work. This inspires pupils to think more broadly about the world. She also provides ideas on techniques and the resources that could be used. However, the quality of artwork produced by younger pupils is sometimes better than that in older classes. Leaders are planning a more tightly focused curriculum for art and other subjects such as science, geography and history. They intend that it will be structured in small steps so that pupils can gradually build up their knowledge and skills.

p.3

3

Pupils enjoy a wide range of after-school clubs, including gardening, robotics, karate and choir. All pupils take part in dramatic productions such as ‘Peter Pan’ and ‘Matilda’.

p.3

3

Younger pupils are particularly keen to please their teachers. They concentrate well on their learning. Children in early years remember their learning well. The curriculum is carefully designed to meet their needs. Staff constantly model the rich language they expect children to know. They regularly check the children’s understanding and revisit learning basic skills. Stories are used to good effect to introduce children to new learning. This includes a wide range of texts to help children understand that people come from different backgrounds and families. Children are taught to be respectful of each other and they are. 5 to 7 July 2022

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.

p.4

Safeguarding

Leaders, including governors, have not ensured that school is a consistently safe environment for all pupils. Leaders, teachers and support staff do not react to concerns about pupils’ behaviour in school and in the wider community well. Senior leaders are aware of the risk of child sexual exploitation in the locality but have failed to prioritise this aspect of the curriculum. This potentially leaves pupils at a greater risk of harm.

p.4

Safeguarding

Leaders do not ensure that safeguarding and behaviour incidents, and the ensuing actions taken by the school, are recorded in the school’s management information system as a matter of course. This means that leaders do not have sufficient oversight of the impact of their work to modify behaviour.

p.4

Safeguarding

Some staff do not understand the routes for making referrals to children’s social care. Many believe the route taken for pastoral and/or academic support is a child protection referral. Leaders do not know how to follow up and challenge the decisions made by children’s social care appropriately.

p.4

Safeguarding

The welfare of pupils, including the most vulnerable, is not checked regularly when they are absent from school for lengthy periods of time. Leaders rely on local knowledge and asking parents about their child’s well-being. Leaders have insufficient focus on potential safeguarding risks. Leaders are over-reliant on other services to check up on the welfare of pupils who are frequently absent.

p.4

Safeguarding

Older pupils do not have an age-appropriate understanding of personal space and respect for one another’s bodies. Pupils reported incidents of inappropriately touching, pinching, kicking, slapping, punching and holding in a headlock to members of the inspection team. Pupils also reported sexualised behaviours which are not recorded in the school’s management information system. Leaders are aware of one or two incidents. They took action to stop this behaviour. Their actions have not been effective.

p.4

Safeguarding

Some pupils do not tell staff about the behaviour of other pupils for fear of retaliation. Some staff spoken to understood why pupils are scared to report incidents to them. Leaders do not know the true extent of concerning behaviour. They cannot take the steps needed to keep pupils safe.

p.4

Safeguarding

Governors do not have an accurate view of safeguarding and behaviour issues in the school. Governors know about practical issues, such as building security, but are unable to articulate how the wider culture of safeguarding is developed at Roman Road. They do not receive detailed behaviour and safeguarding analyses about trends over time. Governors do not monitor the actions that leaders take to safeguard pupils in a sufficiently robust way. 5 to 7 July 2022

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Safeguarding is not effective. Pupils are potentially at risk of harm, abuse and neglect. Leaders must ensure that all safeguarding, together with the actions taken to address the incidents, are recorded in the school’s management information system. Leaders must ensure that they report child protection incidents to the appropriate authorities in a timely manner. Leaders must ensure that all staff are trained in wider safeguarding issues, including child sexual and criminal exploitation and county lines. Leaders must ensure all staff understand that safeguarding issues, such as radicalisation, could affect their pupils.  Some pupils do not report incidents of poor behaviour. These pupils do not get the support or help that they need in a timely manner. Leaders must ensure that pupils report such concerns, and any necessary actions are taken immediately.  The PHSE curriculum is not fully developed. Some older pupils have little

p.5

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

knowledge about relationships, off-line risk-taking behaviours (including sexualised behaviours) and the protected characteristics. Leaders must ensure the curriculum for PHSE is developed fully and that staff are trained to deliver the content of the curriculum confidently.  In some subjects of the wider curriculum beyond mathematics and phonics, the precise knowledge that pupils need to know in key stage 2 does not build on from the pupils’ previous learning in key stage 1 and the early years. This leads to gaps in pupils’ knowledge. Leaders should complete their plans to revisit these curriculum areas to ensure that knowledge and skills are sequenced carefully and that no gaps in curriculum coverage remain.

p.5

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.5

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.5

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.5

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school. 5 to 7 July 2022

p.5

6

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 5 to 7 July 2022

p.6

School details

Inspection number 10227106 Type of school Primary

p.7

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.7

School details

Date of previous inspection 29 and 30 June 2016, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.7

Information about this school

 The school does not use an alternative provision.  There has been a new headteacher since the last inspection.  The proportion of pupils eligible for free school meals is well above the national average.  The number of pupils with SEND is well above the national average.

p.7

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We deemed the inspection a section 5 inspection under the same Act.

p.7

Information about this inspection

In accordance with section 44(2) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement, because it is performing significantly less well than it might in all the circumstances reasonably be expected to perform. 5 to 7 July 2022

p.7

8

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors held meetings with the headteacher, deputy headteacher, early years leader and special educational needs coordinator.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in four subjects: reading, mathematics, art and geography. To do this, they met with curriculum leaders, visited lessons, looked at pupils’ work, listened to pupils read and met with teachers and pupils. Inspectors also looked at curriculum documentation for history, design technology and science.  The lead inspector met representatives of the local governing body, including the vice-chair. She also met with the local authority education advisor who supports the school.  Responses to the pupil, parent and staff surveys were also taken into

p.8

Inspection team

Mary Cook, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.8

Inspection team

Katie Spurr Her Majesty’s Inspector 5 to 7 July 2022

p.8

9

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.9

9

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

9

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.9

9

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.9

9

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion