Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by After Care (NW) Limited in Sefton
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
After Care NW Limited
- Inspection date verified
16 Sept 2022
- Inspectors verified
Nicola Shaw
- Helped and protected verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectivenesssingle source
Good
- Name on report verified
2547837
- URN verified
2547837
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2021.
- OverallGood
- Helped and protectedGood
- Leadership and managementGood
70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- In particular, the registered person should ensure— p.5
- Specifically, the registered person should ensure that risk management plans consistently include clear actions that staff need to take. 17 November p.5
- The registered person should ensure that when a child returns to the home after being missing from care or away from the home without permission, the responsible local authority provides an opportunity for the child to have an independent return home interview. p.6
- The registered person should ensure that the home is well maintained. p.6
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance8
“Risk management plans are of inconsistent quality.” p.3Progress & outcomes4
“Therefore, children are making good progress from their starting points.” p.3Communication & language2
“Communication between staff and the important people in each child’s life is excellent.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,118
- about usual (typical 1319)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 54, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report for children’s home: 2547837 1 Registered provider: After Care NW Limited Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this children’s home
This is a privately operated home, providing care for up to three children experiencing social, emotional and/or mental health needs.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The registered manager has been in post since July 2020.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account: good
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
How well children and young people are helped and protected good
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
The effectiveness of leaders and managers good
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
Date of last inspection: 8 December 2021
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
Overall judgement at last inspection: good
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
Enforcement action since last inspection: none Inspection report for children’s home: 2547837 2
p.1
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement
08/12/2021 Full Good Inspection report for children’s home: 2547837 3
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children feel happy and cared for while living in this home. One child said, ‘This is the only place I’ve ever felt loved.’ Another child described when talking about staff, ‘They do everything they can for me. I know they’ve always got me.’ Staff are nurturing to children, resulting in children feeling relaxed.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children receive a high standard of support and care. Staff take creative approaches to supporting children. Children’s views are at the heart of all planning. As a result, children feel listened to and valued.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Staff form effective relationships with professionals and family members. Communication between staff and the important people in each child’s life is excellent. Children therefore experience a holistic and consistent approach to their care.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Staff understand each child’s individual needs and goals. Each child has detailed plans in respect of their health, education and leisure time. Staff regularly review these plans and so are knowledgeable about what support is needed to help each child reach their potential. Therefore, children are making good progress from their starting points.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
The home environment is warm and inviting, and attempts have been made to create a welcoming family atmosphere. However, there are unresolved maintenance issues and some areas of the home and furniture need updating. One child has noted in a children’s meeting that the dining chairs are old and need replacing.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Staff are passionate about the welfare of the children. Staff go the extra mile to keep children safe. Staff understand potential indicators of increased risk and know their role and responsibilities in a range of safeguarding scenarios. Children are safer as a result of living in this home.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Risk management plans are of inconsistent quality. In particular, the self-harm and ligature risk management plan does not provide staff with a clear guide on how to manage this risk. This has not impacted on children but has the potential to do so. Staff take an empathetic, trauma-informed approach. One child said, ‘Even when I’m being an angry person, they [staff] always understand. They always do their best to help me.’ This helps children develop trusting relationships with the adults looking after them.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Regular key-work sessions are used to support children in understanding their own life experiences and risks. This means that children are not just kept safe by the Inspection report for children’s home: 2547837 4 care that they receive, but they are equipped with the knowledge and skills to improve their overall safety in the long term.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
The staff team uses a consistent and fair approach to behaviour management. Achievements are frequently celebrated, and negative consequences are only used as a last resort. Staff are trained to safely use physical intervention, but incidents of restraint are rare. Records of physical interventions do not detail all essential information. This is a missed opportunity for learning.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Children have been reported missing from this home. There is a detailed missing- from-care protocol in place, which staff understand and follow. Children are not always offered a return home interview carried out by an independent person. This means that children have not had the opportunity to explore their reasons for going missing with someone impartial.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The home is led by a suitably qualified manager. The manager is proactive and enthusiastic about achieving the best outcomes for the children in her care. She encourages the staff team to share this attitude. This helps children to recognise their own potential and make good progress.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The manager considers whether staff are able to meet each child’s needs before they move in. She takes time to review the risks in the local area and the needs of other children who already live in the home. This approach to the assessment of risk informs a culture of safe practice in the home.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The registered manager has implemented good systems for internal oversight. This regular review allows her to identify and address any issues in a timely manner.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Supervision takes place regularly and is of consistently good quality. Supervision is reflective and child-focused. This allows the manager to conduct an effective formal evaluation of staff performance. Staff feel supported by the management team.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The registered manager completes an effective review of the quality of care. Feedback from professionals and children is a useful contribution. Robust analysis and evaluation mean that the manager has a good understanding of the areas of improvement. Inspection report for children’s home: 2547837 5
p.4
Statutory requirements
This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, the Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.
p.5
Requirement Due date
The protection of children standard is that children are protected from harm and enabled to keep themselves safe.
p.5
Requirement Due date
In particular, the registered person should ensure—
p.5
Requirement Due date
that the home’s day-to-day care is arranged and delivered so as to keep each child safe and to protect each child effectively from harm. (Regulation 12 (1) (2)(b))
p.5
Requirement Due date
Specifically, the registered person should ensure that risk management plans consistently include clear actions that staff need to take. 17 November
p.5
Requirement Due date
within 24 hours of the use of a measure of control, discipline or restraint in relation to a child in the home, a record is made which includes—
p.5
Requirement Due date
a description of the measure and its duration; and
p.5
Requirement Due date
that within 5 days of the use of the measure, the registered person or the authorised person adds to the record confirmation that they have spoken to the child about the measure. (Regulation 35 (3)(a)(iv)(c))
p.5
Requirement Due date
This specifically relates to managers ensuring that records consistently include all details of the restraint used and the child’s views. 17 November Inspection report for children’s home: 2547837 6
p.5
Recommendations
The registered person should ensure that when a child returns to the home after being missing from care or away from the home without permission, the responsible local authority provides an opportunity for the child to have an independent return home interview. (Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’, page 45, paragraph 9.30)
p.6
Recommendations
The registered person should ensure that the home is well maintained. (Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’, page 15, paragraph 3.9)
p.6
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people, using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. Inspection report for children’s home: 2547837 7
p.6
Children’s home details
Registered provider: After Care NW Limited
p.7
Children’s home details
Registered provider address: 45 Kensington Road, Southport, Lancashire PR9 0RT
p.7
Children’s home details
Responsible individual: Timothy Blundell
p.7
Inspector
Nicola Shaw, Social Care Regulatory Inspector Inspection report for children’s home: 2547837 8 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
Inspector
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
Inspector
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
Inspector
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion