Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (EIF)

Leybourne Pre-School

Inspected 23 Sept 2022 · published 28 Oct 2022 · URN EY402175

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Saunders, Michele Donna

  • Group reference verified

    RP513710

  • Inspection date verified

    23 Sept 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    Sarah Taylor-Smith

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    ME19 5QL

  • Name on report verified

    Leybourne Pre-School

  • URN verified

    EY402175

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentInadequate
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−46Criticalmore positive than 36% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoyclearmake good progresspositiveeffectiveindependentsecuresecure knowledge
Criticismlackweaknessesgapsconcernsnot clearunclearnot effectiveat risk

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings704w−52
  • Safeguarding238w−33
  • What needs to improve16w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
924
about usual (typical 972)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 51
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
1
typical 1
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 49%Safeguarding 17%What needs to improve 1%About the inspection 33%

Full report text

Inspection of Leybourne Pre-School Village Hall, Little Market Row, Leybourne, WEST MALLING, Kent ME19 5QL

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good

p.1

The provision is inadequate

There is not enough consistency from staff to support children's behaviour. The setting's behaviour policy is unclear to staff and the way they support children's behaviour varies widely. Despite this, children play well together and build positive friendships. Staff want the best for children. However, the lack of consistent support for their practice, gaps in their safeguarding knowledge and an inconsistent curriculum impacts on children's experiences.

p.2

The provision is inadequate

Children settle quickly after they arrive at pre-school and build suitable relationships with staff. The deployment of staff is effective and they are close by to play with children. For example, children enjoy building with different construction toys. They build farms and actively get animals and tractors to extend their play. Children chat to staff about their play and share their plans. However, children lack the opportunity to access a curriculum that focuses on support for their overall development. Children enjoy their time at the pre-school, as staff create an interesting environment with a range of toys that occupy them. However, activities that staff plan lack a clear purpose and intent about what it is that children can learn from them. Staff identify next steps in children's learning to help move their development on. However, these are not accurate or individual enough to support children's overall progress.

p.2

need to do better?

n Staff do not receive enough suitable support to help identify and address weaknesses in their practice. For example, there are gaps in staff's understanding of safeguarding procedures. At times, the team do not work well enough together to ensure that the setting runs smoothly. Concerns that arise between team members are not addressed promptly. This impacts on the experiences of children and the development of the setting. n Parents have recently started to become reengaged in the day-to-day life of the setting, following the COVID-19 pandemic. The manager welcomes parents to join in events, such as group visits to the local park. She feels that this is going well. n Staff plan next steps in learning for children. However, there are often too many to focus on to support children's development. This does not support staff to identify and address any gaps in children's learning or development. However,

p.2

need to do better?

children with special educational needs and/or disabilities receive some suitable support to meet their needs. Additional funding is used appropriately. n Staff approach children's behaviour in different ways and there is not a clear vision shared by all staff. For example, sometimes staff ask children to walk and praise them as children continue to run. This does not support children's understanding of their own safety. Staff and children are not clear on what is

p.2

need to do better?

23 September 2022 expected from them. n The curriculum does not consistently support children well enough to develop in all areas of learning. Staff do not have a clear enough intention for what they want children to learn from the activities they plan. There is often a higher level of adult input, particularly during craft activities, which limits children's opportunities to learn. As a result, not all children make enough progress to help them be ready for their next stage of learning at school. n Staff build suitable links with other local settings. For example, they help children to become familiar with the local primary school. They seek information about other settings that children attend and share observations of children's play. n There are suitable care routines in place. For example, children understand to let staff know if they want to access the toilet, and staff are close by to offer support where needed. However, at times staff complete tasks for children that

p.2

need to do better?

they can do themselves, such as putting on their own coats and wellies. This limits children's opportunity to be independent and further develop their physical skills. n Children show that they feel secure in the company of adults. For example, they happily chat about their families and upcoming birthdays during snack. Staff help to extend conversations by asking questions to support their communication and language skills.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Not all staff have a secure knowledge of the local authority procedures about how to share concerns about a child's welfare. However, staff have go a clear understanding of the signs that may show a child may be at risk of harm. The manager, who is the designated safeguarding lead, is clear about the action to take. However, the policy is not up to date and the information staff have to follow is unclear and confusing. This compromises children's safety. However, the manager is aware and is in the final stages of amending the policy. She is aware of her responsibility to share this with the team. Staff do have confident knowledge on a range of areas that could impact on a child's safety.

p.3

Due date

23 September 2022 ensure that all staff have a secure, up- to-date knowledge of safeguarding issues, including the action to take in the event of a concern about a child 30/09/2022

p.3

Due date

ensure that staff receive appropriate support, through supervision, to identify weaknesses in practice and suitable ongoing support to develop their skills 12/10/2022

p.4

Due date

implement a behaviour policy that staff understand to support children to know what is expected of them 12/10/2022

p.4

Due date

ensure that children's individual learning is planned precisely to support their overall development 12/10/2022

p.4

Due date

implement a clear curriculum, so children's learning is purposeful to ensure that they make good progress in all areas of learning. 12/10/2022

p.4

should:

n develop staff practice to support children to have opportunities to be independent throughout the day.

p.4

Setting details

Unique reference number EY402175 Local authority Kent Inspection number 10257480 Type of provision Childcare on non-domestic premises Registers Early Years Register Day care type Sessional day care

p.5

inspection

Total number of places 30 Number of children on roll 55 Name of registered person Saunders, Michele Donna

p.5

reference number

Telephone number 07702835171 Date of previous inspection 20 June 2017

p.5

Information about this early years setting

Leybourne Pre-School registered in 2009 and is in Leybourne, Kent. The pre-school is open on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday from 9am until 3pm and on Thursday from 9am to midday, during term time only. The pre-school employs nine members of staff, five of whom hold a relevant early years qualification at level 3. The provider receives funding to provide free early education for children aged two, three and four years.

p.5

Inspection activities

n This was the first routine inspection the provider received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the provider and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the provider. n The manager and the inspector completed a learning walk together to discuss the intentions for children's learning. n Staff spoke to the inspector during the inspection. n The inspector gained parent feedback through discussions with the manager. n The inspector sampled documentation, such as the safeguarding policy and evidence of staff suitability checks.

p.6

Inspection activities

We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.6

Inspection activities

23 September 2022 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

Inspection activities

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

Inspection activities

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk

p.7

Inspection activities

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Inspection activities

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion