Social care · Children's services visit (ILACS)
Setting
Summary
Louise Walker (lead), Teresa Godfrey
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Louise Walker, Teresa Godfrey
- Postcode verified
S1 2HH
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 978
- shorter than usual (typical 1616)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 42, typical 39
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 3
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Andrew Jones Director of Children’s Services Town Hall Pinstone Street Sheffield S1 2HH
p.1
Focused visit to Sheffield children’s services
This letter summarises the findings of the focused visit to Sheffield children’s services on 21 and 22 September 2022. His Majesty’s Inspectors for this visit were Louise Walker and Teresa Godfrey.
p.1
Focused visit to Sheffield children’s services
Inspectors looked at the local authority’s arrangements for planning and achieving permanence.
p.1
Focused visit to Sheffield children’s services
This visit was carried out in line with the inspection of local authority children's services (ILACS) framework. Inspectors were primarily on site and met with practitioners, managers and leaders. They reviewed a range of evidence, including child records, performance data and quality assurance information, life-story work and later life letters. Inspectors used video calls for discussions with external partners and the elected portfolio holder.
p.1
Headline findings
Plans for permanence are identified at the earliest opportunity for most children. There are effective arrangements in place for quality assuring and tracking these plans to minimise drift and delay. Where drift is identified, there is evidence of effective challenge from independent reviewing officers (IROs) and senior managers. A range of permanence options are considered for children. Sensitive work is completed with children to gain their views and help them to understand and prepare for their permanent home. A small number of older children experience delay in the transition to adult services, partly due to the challenge in relation to the sufficiency of suitable accommodation for young adults with support needs.
p.1
Headline findings
There is strong corporate and political support for children’s services and a commitment to ‘doing the right thing’ for children in the city. The senior leadership team and lead member provide a clear vision, and good social work can flourish. Social workers feel well supported by managers. They value the learning and career Ofsted
p.1
Headline findings
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 Textphone 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.gov.uk/ofsted development opportunities available to them, which enhances the support they can provide to children.
p.1
What needs to improve in this area of social work practice?
The transition planning for children to adult services.
p.2
What needs to improve in this area of social work practice?
The quality and consistency of supervision recording.
p.2
Main findings
Where children are no longer able to remain with parents, social workers put in place plans at the earliest opportunities. Where thresholds for legal proceedings are met, applications to court are made in a timely way to secure permanence for children. Reports to court are of good quality and support the decision-making and the earliest conclusion of proceedings for children.
p.2
Main findings
There is strong and effective management oversight to track permanence planning for children, meaning drift and delay is minimised. Where delay is identified, effective processes are in place to challenge this.
p.2
Main findings
Some children with a disability who will require support into adulthood do not always receive a smooth transition into adult services. This results in delay in progressing plans for them, particularly in relation to accommodation. When this does occur, there is evidence of challenge from the IRO and advocacy service to address this and represent children’s views.
p.2
Main findings
When reunification home to parents is planned, the process is thorough, supported and the views of children are considered and kept at the centre of their plans.
p.2
Main findings
The fostering matching process is robust, where the needs of the children already living in the household are considered alongside those of any new child entering the foster home. This means that potential disruption is managed the best it can be.
p.2
Main findings
Foster carers feel well supported through the recruitment process and ongoing training. They have established strong support networks and provide mentoring to newly approved carers, which benefits the children living with them.
p.2
Main findings
The importance of children's family ties and relationships are evident when considering plans for permanence and arrangements for family time. Practitioners work hard to embed the ethos of enabling children to grow up within their birth families wherever possible.
p.2
Main findings
Child placement reports are of good quality, detailed and thorough, and support decision-making and matching to take place for children. Children benefit from the placement finding team producing individualised pen pictures that highlight their likes, what makes them happy, what they are wanting in a home and carers, and what support they need.
p.2
Main findings
Culturally sensitive life-story work and later-in-life letters are completed by social workers. These provide children with a record of memories and a good understanding of their experiences, their birth family and how the people involved made the decisions about them.
p.3
Main findings
An improved offer of support post special guardianship orders being granted means that children are supported to remain with carers, build attachments and do not experience statutory interventions for unnecessary lengths of time.
p.3
Main findings
Senior leaders know their service well. They have identified the areas of practice that they need to strengthen to improve the experiences and outcomes for children needing permanence. They are engaging effectively with partners and the court to progress these improvement plans.
p.3
Main findings
There is a comprehensive quality assurance framework in place. Not all audit activity seen was completed collaboratively with practitioners and managers. This is a missed opportunity for social workers to reflect on the impact of practice for children and families. Learning from quality assurance activity and the recognition and sharing of good practice is evident.
p.3
Main findings
Supervision takes place regularly and staff report that they benefit from reflective discussions that support their practice development. However, the records reviewed did not always capture the detail of these discussions. This means that challenge, reflection and learning about the impact of practice for children and families is not always captured.
p.3
Main findings
Workers spoke very positively about working for Sheffield, and having good management support by managers and senior managers who are accessible for advice and decision-making. Having manageable workloads was valued by staff, which makes it possible for them to do meaningful work with children. Staff have access to good-quality training opportunities and a career progression pathway, which is valued by them and contributes to the high social work retention rate.
p.3
Main findings
Ofsted will take the findings from this focused visit into account when planning the next inspection or visit.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion