Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF)

Childminder in Rochdale

Inspected 12 Sept 2022 · published 24 Oct 2022 · URN EY493225

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Joanne Valek

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    12 Sept 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    Joanne Valek

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Outstanding

  • Quality of education verified

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    Childminder report

  • URN verified

    EY493225

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentInadequate
  • Quality of educationGood

5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−42Criticalmore positive than 39% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisemake good progresssafeexceptionallyclearstrongsecureeffectivelysupportive
Criticismnot effectivefailedrisk of harmcompromisedbreachfailureat riskbreaches

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings774w−28
  • Safeguarding165w−71

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
907
about usual (typical 899)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 50, typical 51
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
4
typical 1
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 53%Safeguarding 11%About the inspection 35%

Full report text

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Outstanding

p.1

The provision is inadequate

Children's safety and security is compromised. The childminder has not ensured that children are kept safe on the premises because the procedures for assessing risks are not effective. The childminder on several occasions has failed to identify risks, putting children at significant risk of harm. Additionally, the childminder has failed to notify Ofsted of significant events regarding individuals living or working on the premises. That said, although this breach has occurred, it has not had a significant detrimental impact on the well-being of the children.

p.2

The provision is inadequate

The childminder has a clear vision for what she intends the children to learn and builds on the skills children need to develop before they go to school. Children make good progress, and this is supported by the childminder's understanding of individual development and care needs. Most children enter happily into the setting and settle well. Children who are new to the setting and are still settling in, are given cuddles and reassurance throughout the day. Children are treated as individuals and are listened to. They are given choices about what they want to do and are always spoken to about what is happening.

p.2

need to do better?

n The childminder was unaware she needed to notify Ofsted of changes to individuals that may impact on their suitability, including any changes to their health. However, the childminder has acknowledged that she needs to notify Ofsted of any changes to the suitability of individuals living or working on the premises. During the inspection the suitability of all individuals living or working on the premises was discussed, and there has been no impact on the care or education provided for the children. n The childminder's risk assessments are not effective. The childminder notified Ofsted of an incident prior to the inspection where there had been a failure to identify that she needed to check that the front gate was securely closed. This led to children being at significant risk of harm. After this happened the childminder proactively put strategies in place to minimise the risk and is working on further security of the premises. Risk assessments are carried out

p.2

need to do better?

each day. However, further risks regarding the safety of the outdoor environment were identified by the inspector during the inspection. The childminder had failed to identify these. This poses a risk to children's safety. n Children's behaviour is managed well. Some children have complex needs and struggle to regulate their behaviour, but the childminder is calm and puts strategies in place to support them. Children settle well and are supported in their emotional development by the childminder and the assistants. However, there is an inability to determine whether children feel totally safe and secure following an incident that happened prior to the inspection where the safety of

p.2

need to do better?

12 September 2022 children was compromised. n For a period of time throughout the day, the childminder applies an exception to the usual ratios. This is to support the continuity of care. The childminder has risk assessed this and adapted the environment to support the supervision of children. Parents have been made aware of the increased ratio. This does not have a negative impact on the children. Assistants move throughout the setting to make sure that they are deployed effectively, and children are being supervised. n Parents express how supportive the childminder has been. They talk about how their children have progressed exceptionally well since being at the setting. There is clear communication provided to parents about their children's day. However, communication with parents is not completely effective, as parents have not been informed of the safeguarding procedures they need follow to keep children safe while on the premises, such as closing doors and gates

p.2

need to do better?

behind them when leaving and entering the premises. n The childminder plans activities to promote skills the children need to prepare them for school. Children engage in a 'what's in the box' activity to help promote their language development, turn taking and ability to listen. Due to some children having additional needs, such as children with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), the childminder understands the importance of starting these skills early to make sure they are well embedded. n Children make good progress from their starting points, especially children with SEND. The childminder demonstrates strong knowledge on how to gain additional support for children and is able to plan activities to support individual needs. The childminder has an extensive knowledge of working with children with autism. The childminder and assistants are clear on the targets they want children to achieve.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

The childminder has failed to identify risks that could put children at risk of harm. Procedures that are put in place to identify and minimise risks are not effective and have led to significant breaches in the requirements. Also, the childminder was not aware of when she needed to notify Ofsted of changes to household members so that Ofsted can carry out suitability checks. The childminder and assistants are clear on their knowledge of recording and reporting concerns about children to the appropriate professionals. They also understand what should concern them about children's exposure to radicalisation and drug-related crimes.

p.3

Due date

ensure that knowledge and procedures used to identify risks to children are strengthened so that the environment is always safe and secure 28/09/2022

p.4

Due date

ensure that all parents, household members and individuals working with children are aware of safeguarding procedures, such as closing doors and gates behind them when they enter or leave the premises, to keep children safe. 28/09/2022

p.4

Setting details

Unique reference number EY493225 Local authority Rochdale Inspection number 10252712 Type of provision Childminder

p.5

Registers

Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Childminder

p.5

inspection

Total number of places 12 Number of children on roll 10 Date of previous inspection 20 October 2017

p.5

Information about this early years setting

The childminder registered in 2015 and lives in Rochdale. She operates all year round, from 8am to 6pm, Monday to Friday, except for bank holidays and family holidays. The childminder works with an assistant and a co-childminder, who also works with an assistant.

p.5

Inspection activities

n This was the first routine inspection the childminder received since the COVID- 19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the provider and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the provider. n We carried out this inspection as a result of a risk assessment, following information we received from the provider. n The inspector viewed the provision and discussed the safety and suitability of the premises. n The childminder and the inspector discussed how the childminder organises their early years provision, including the aims and rationale for their early years foundation stage curriculum. n Some children spoke to the inspector about what they enjoy doing while with the childminder. n The inspector observed the interactions between the childminder, her assistants and the children. n The inspector carried out joint observations of group activities with the childminder.

p.6

Inspection activities

n The childminder provided the inspector with a sample of key documentation on request. n The inspector spoke to several parents during the inspection and took account of their views.

p.6

Inspection activities

We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.6

Inspection activities

12 September 2022 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

Inspection activities

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

Inspection activities

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk

p.7

Inspection activities

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Inspection activities

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion