Early years · Early years inspection (EIF)
Wren Day Nursery
Summary
Karen Laycock (lead), Jacqueline Coomer
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Philip and Penelope Shaw Partnership
- Group reference verified
RP522845
- Inspection date verified
22 Jul 2022
- Inspectors AI-checked
Jacqueline Coomer, Karen Laycock
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Inadequate
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Postcode verified
CV8 2LG
- Name on report verified
Wren Day Nursery
- URN verified
200840
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2022.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentInadequate
- Quality of educationInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Children fail to make the progress they are capable of because the quality of education that children receive is poor. p.2
- Hygiene is poor and risk assessment is ineffective. p.3
- The quality of teaching is inadequate because the activities provided do not p.2
- The provider has failed to make suitable improvements since the last inspection. p.2
- The provider does not recognise the risk posed by poor hygiene practice. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- However, staff and managers are able to describe the possible signs and symptoms of abuse and neglect and what action they need to take in the event of a concern about welfare of the children in their care. p.3
- She does not provide effective supervision, coaching and training of staff or the manager, to identify their professional development needs to help them to fulfil their roles and responsibilities. p.2
- The provider does not have a good enough understanding of the vetting checks that need to be completed to fully assess staff's suitability to work with children. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Health & safety13
“Hygiene is poor and risk assessment is ineffective.” p.3Records & policies6
“Recruitment and vetting procedures are not robust.” p.3Teaching & assessment5
“Hygiene is poor and risk assessment is ineffective.” p.3Staff development5
“Supervision of children is poor.” p.2Wellbeing & mental health2
“Staff do not manage behaviour effectively, which impacts on children's self-esteem and confidence.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,079
- about usual (typical 972)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 53, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Wren Day Nursery Stoneleigh Park, Kenilworth, Warwickshire CV8 2LG
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Inadequate
p.1
The provision is inadequate
Children's safety is compromised. The provider does not have suitable policies and procedures in place to protect children with allergies. The provider does not identify and promptly remove hazards in the environment. Staff do not manage behaviour effectively, which impacts on children's self-esteem and confidence. The provider does not have a good enough understanding of the vetting checks that need to be completed to fully assess staff's suitability to work with children. Children's safety and welfare are not promoted. Hygiene standards are inadequate. Supervision of children is poor. Children play in the home corner with a knife, unsupervised, and staff do not notice or respond to children who climb on chairs. In addition, staff are unaware of how accidents occur.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Children fail to make the progress they are capable of because the quality of education that children receive is poor. Although there is an emphasis on the prime areas of learning, and children develop some language, physical and social skills, the curriculum provided does not cover all areas of learning. Activities are not sufficiently challenging and are not matched to children's learning needs. This results in children who become bored and disengaged. For example, during a group activity, children roll around and wander off and, when staff bring them back, this creates further disruption for the other children.
p.2
need to do better?
n Leaders do not ensure staff who work with children are suitable to do so. This is because they have not obtained the required Disclosure and Barring Service checks for all staff. Furthermore, they are not aware of the requirement to undertake additional criminal records checks for anyone who has lived or worked abroad. n The provider has failed to make suitable improvements since the last inspection. She does not provide effective supervision, coaching and training of staff or the manager, to identify their professional development needs to help them to fulfil their roles and responsibilities. In addition, staff, including the manager, are not aware of children's next steps in all areas of learning. Consequently, children are not making the progress they are capable of. n Risk assessment is inadequate. The provider does not ensure that the premises and equipment are safe. For example, there are rusty nails protruding on the
p.2
need to do better?
playhouse, as well as sharp pieces of wood, all within children's reach. Other hazards include screws protruding from a table in the playground and newly cut branches on a shrub which are extremely sharp and positioned at the top of steps without any handrail, and at children's face level. n The provider does not recognise the risk posed by poor hygiene practice. For example, babies use high chairs that have a build-up of old food around the
p.2
need to do better?
22 July 2022 sides and seat area; the covers are ripped and are not cleaned effectively. When children drop their cups on the floor, these are returned to the children to use. These practises do not support children's understanding of how to keep themselves safe or prevent the spread of infection. n On several occasions, children have been given food they are allergic to. Despite this, the provider has failed to ensure robust systems are in place to ensure another incident of this nature does not occur. This puts children at risk of harm. n Staff do not manage behaviour effectively. For example, children are singled out to sit on a mat if they fidget during a group activity. In addition, children are served a different pudding to others if they do not eat their main meal. These practises do not support children's self-esteem and confidence or help them to learn about acceptable behaviour. n The quality of teaching is inadequate because the activities provided do not
p.2
need to do better?
match individual children's learning needs. Children do not participate in activities that have clearly identified learning intentions. For example, in the baby room, children are provided with soft-play resources and freestanding, electronic activity toys. Children show no interest in the electronic toys and staff are not clear about why these have been provided or how they can be used to extend children's learning. n There is a lack of a coherent and consistent toilet training strategy throughout the nursery. This does not support children to learn to manage their own personal care when they are ready to do so. n Parents comment their children are happy in the nursery and that the staff are very kind.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Recruitment and vetting procedures are not robust. This puts children at risk because the suitability of some of the adults is not assured. Hygiene is poor and risk assessment is ineffective. Procedures to ensure that children with allergies and dietary intolerances are not put at risk, are ineffective. As a result, children are not safe. However, staff and managers are able to describe the possible signs and symptoms of abuse and neglect and what action they need to take in the event of a concern about welfare of the children in their care.
p.3
Due date
22 July 2022 ensure effective systems are in place to assure the suitability of all staff, which include completing enhanced criminal records checks and barred list checks and obtaining the required additional checks for all those who have lived or worked abroad 19/08/2022
p.3
Due date
implement effective processes for identifying and removing risks in the environment 19/08/2022
p.4
Due date
ensure robust procedures are in place to remove risks to children with allergies at mealtimes 19/08/2022
p.4
Due date
ensure staff manage children's behaviour in an appropriate way 19/08/2022
p.4
Due date
ensure that children are appropriately supervised at all times 19/08/2022
p.4
Due date
ensure children's good health is promoted, in particular ensure equipment, such as high chairs and cups, is clean and hygienic 19/08/2022
p.4
Due date
ensure that the premises and equipment used for the purpose of childcare are safe and suitable 19/08/2022
p.4
Due date
provide support and coaching for the manager and all staff to ensure that they have appropriate knowledge, skills and understanding to fulfil their roles and responsibilities. 19/08/2022
p.4
Due date
devise and implement a rich, well- sequenced and ambitious curriculum that meets the learning and development needs of children and covers all areas of learning 16/09/2022
p.4
Due date
22 July 2022 improve the monitoring of practice to ensure all staff have a secure understanding of how to make accurate assessments of children's learning and development 16/09/2022
p.4
Due date
support staff to plan activities, covering all areas of learning, that precisely link to children's next steps in learning 16/09/2022
p.5
Due date
develop and implement an effective programme of toilet training to support children's independence and readiness for school. 16/09/2022
p.5
Setting details
Unique reference number 200840 Local authority Warwickshire Inspection number 10232249 Type of provision Childcare on non-domestic premises
p.6
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register Day care type Full day care
p.6
inspection
Total number of places 102 Number of children on roll 104 Name of registered person Philip and Penelope Shaw Partnership
p.6
reference number
Telephone number 02476 418957 Date of previous inspection 25 February 2022
p.6
Information about this early years setting
Wren Day Nursery registered in 1992. It operates from Stoneleigh Park, near Kenilworth in Warwickshire. The nursery employs 23 members of childcare staff. Of these, 21 hold appropriate early years qualifications ranging from level 2 to level 6. The nursery opens from Monday to Friday, all year round, except for bank holidays and one week over the Christmas period. Sessions are from 8.30am to 5.30pm. The nursery provides funded early education for two-, three- and four-year-old children.
p.6
Information about this inspection
Inspectors Karen Laycock Jacqueline Coomer
p.6
Inspection activities
n The inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the provider and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the provider. n The manager, deputy manager and the inspectors completed a learning walk to understand how the setting operates and how the curriculum is organised. The manager and the lead inspector carried out a joint evaluation of activities together. n The manager, deputy manager and the inspectors observed the quality of teaching during activities and assessed the impact this has on children's learning. n The inspectors held discussions with the manager, provider, deputy manager and staff throughout the inspection. They looked at relevant documentation, including qualifications and first-aid certificates, and viewed evidence of the suitability of those working with children. n The inspectors took account of the views of parents spoken to on the day. They also spoke to children about their experiences in the nursery.
p.7
Inspection activities
We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.7
Inspection activities
22 July 2022 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
Inspection activities
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
Inspection activities
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.8
Inspection activities
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
Inspection activities
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion