Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Pembroke Park Primary School

Inspected 7 Jul 2022 · URN 139386

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    7 Jul 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    Adam Matthews, Ben Jordan, Heather Barraclough

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Early years verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Requires improvement

  • Quality of education verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    SP2 9LY

  • Name on report verified

    Pembroke Park Primary School

  • URN verified

    139386

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
  • Early yearsInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentRequires improvement
  • Quality of educationInadequate

3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+1Mixedmore positive than 83% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveconfidentpositivestrongambitioushappyfeel safeenjoy
Criticismpoorgapslow expectationsstruggleshortcomingstoo lowdisruptiveconcern

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1241w−7
  • Safeguarding107w+43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,310
about usual (typical 1552)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 58, typical 53
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
6
typical 6
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 64%Safeguarding 6%About the inspection 31%

Full report text

Inspection of Pembroke Park Primary School Devizes Road, Salisbury, Wiltshire SP2 9LY

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Inadequate Early years provision Inadequate Previous inspection grade Good 6 and 7 July 2022

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The quality of education that pupils receive is poor. Although pupils are happy and say they feel safe, they have significant gaps in their learning. As a result, pupils are not well prepared for the next stage of their education.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Some leaders’ expectations of what pupils can achieve, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), are too low. The learning provided for pupils does not build on what they already know or can do. As a result, they do not develop the necessary knowledge, understanding and skills to enable them to succeed.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Behaviour is improving. The new systems that have been put in place by the acting headteacher, known as the ‘Pembroke Way’, are helping. Pupils say that bullying does happen. Most pupils are confident that staff will deal with any issues quickly.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy the wide range of lunchtime and after-school clubs, such as chess, cooking and dance. Older pupils are proud to take on roles of responsibility, such as members of the ‘school parliament’. They say that this helps them understand the importance of democracy and fairness.

p.2

better?

Senior leaders, trustees and local governors have not acted quickly enough to address the significant decline since the previous inspection. Although changes in leadership have been a factor, governors and trustees have not assured themselves that leaders’ actions have made enough of a positive difference to pupils’ learning.

p.2

better?

The recently appointed acting headteacher knows the school well. She has quickly identified what needs to be done to make the school better by challenging low expectations of pupils’ behaviour and bringing the staff team together. However, some new initiatives are too new to see any demonstrable impact.

p.2

better?

Pupils do not learn to read as well as they could. A significant number of pupils in the early years and key stage 1 are unable to read with confidence. Staff are not consistent in teaching the school’s agreed approach to phonics. They do not focus precisely enough on the sounds they want pupils to know. Too many pupils have books that do not match the sounds they know. As a result, pupils are not developing into fluent readers.

p.2

better?

Leaders have recently started to reorganise the curriculum. However, learning is not planned well enough in most subjects, including in the early years. The key knowledge pupils need to know is not sequenced coherently so that pupils build on previous learning and know more and remember more over time. In early years, children do not gain the knowledge and skills they need to be ready for Year 1. In mathematics, teachers do not routinely ensure that pupils remember the essential mathematical knowledge they need. This leads to gaps in their mathematical 6 and 7 July 2022

p.2

3

learning. For example, pupils struggled to recall number bonds or to work with fractions.

p.3

3

Teachers do not use assessment well enough to check on what pupils know. Learning is not routinely adapted to meet the needs of pupils, including those with SEND. Pupils do not understand if they have done well or what successful learning looks like. Consequently, their learning slows.

p.3

3

Pupils with SEND do not achieve well. Leaders have not ensured that individual pupil plans to support their learning are precise enough. Individual targets are either too broad or based on assessment information that is inaccurate. Children with social and emotional needs sometimes struggle to access the curriculum. Although interim leaders are aware of this, the work to improve these shortcomings has only just started.

p.3

3

Leaders have raised their expectations of how pupils should behave. Despite these improvements, parents and carers remain concerned about pupils’ behaviour. Some pupils revert to low-level disruptive behaviour in class when learning does not match their needs well enough. Younger pupils struggle to manage their emotions during play and lunchtimes.

p.3

3

Leaders have designed a personal development curriculum which makes clear some of the knowledge that pupils need to learn. They seek to promote pupils’ personal development through lessons and assemblies. Pupils develop their moral understanding by learning about the importance of manners. However, leaders’ work to ensure that pupils are confident in discussing and understanding different cultures and faiths is less developed.

p.3

3

Staff are positive about working at the school. They welcome the recent changes and systems that have been put in place. They say that governors and leaders consider their workload and well-being.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders ensure that there is a strong culture of safeguarding. Staff use their training well to spot signs of concern quickly. Leaders know the safeguarding needs within the local community. They use this information to ensure the most vulnerable pupils and their families get the help they need. Trust leaders make sure that staff have received the appropriate checks to be able to work in the school.

p.3

Safeguarding

Pupils know how to keep themselves safe in the online world. They talk confidently about their ‘digital footprint’ and know what to do to keep their personal information secure. 6 and 7 July 2022

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Trustees and local governors do not hold school leaders to account for the quality of education. Pupils across the school do not achieve as well as they should. Trust leaders and governors must ensure that there are effective systems in place to increase their level of challenge to school leaders for the quality of education pupils receive.  Leaders do not ensure that the school’s phonics programme is delivered consistently well. Many pupils at the early stages of reading, including in the early years, cannot use and apply phonics to read accurately. Many read books that are too difficult. Leaders must ensure that phonics teaching is effective in all year groups, there is a precise focus on the sounds they want pupils to know and that pupils develop accuracy and read fluently.  The early years provision is poor. Children do not gain the knowledge and skills they need to achieve well across the curriculum. As a result, they are not well

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

prepared for the next stage of their education. Leaders need to ensure that there is a suitably ambitious early years curriculum that enables children to become confident and independent learners.  Leaders have not made clear the essential knowledge pupils need to learn across many subjects. As a result, pupils are not able to confidently recall or use both recent and prior knowledge. Leaders must ensure that the key knowledge pupils need to learn is identified in all subjects. Assessment needs to be effective to check how well pupils know and remember this key knowledge.  Learning is not adapted well enough to meet the needs of pupils with SEND. As a result, these pupils do not learn as well as they should. Leaders and staff must ensure that they check the quality and effectiveness of support plans and how well they are being implemented across the curriculum to ensure that the needs of pupils with SEND are met.

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Having considered the evidence, I strongly recommend that leaders and those responsible for governance do not seek to appoint early career teachers.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted . 6 and 7 July 2022

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.5

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 6 and 7 July 2022

p.5

School details

Inspection number 10210932 Type of school Primary

p.6

School details

Date of previous inspection 21 and 22 June 2016, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.6

Information about this school

 Pembroke Park converted to become an academy in September 2013. It joined the Magna Learning Partnership in September 2020.  There have been significant changes in leadership since the previous inspection. The substantive headteacher, who joined the school in February 2021, was not in school at the time of the inspection. An acting headteacher has been in post since February 2022.  The school currently uses one unregistered alternative provider.

p.6

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.6

Information about this inspection

In accordance with section 44(1) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires special measures because it is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the persons responsible for leading, managing or governing the school are not demonstrating the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. 6 and 7 July 2022

p.6

7

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors met with the acting headteacher, the special educational needs coordinator, groups of staff and representatives from the local governing body and trust.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in the following subjects: early reading, mathematics, science and history. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, looked at samples of work and spoke to pupils about their learning.  The lead inspector listened to pupils in Years 1, 2 and 3 read to an adult.  Inspectors considered how well the school protects pupils and keeps them safe. The lead inspector met with the designated safeguarding leads to evaluate the

p.7

7

effectiveness of safeguarding. An inspector also scrutinised the school’s single central record.  Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons and around the school site. Additionally, inspectors spoke to pupils to discuss their views about the school.  Inspectors considered 55 responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Ofsted Parent View, including 44 free-text responses, 18 responses to the staff survey and 57 responses to the pupil survey.

p.7

Inspection team

Ben Jordan, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.7

Inspection team

Heather Barraclough Her Majesty’s Inspector 6 and 7 July 2022

p.7

8

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

8

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

8

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

8

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

8

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion