Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF)
Childminder in Rotherham
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
12 Jul 2022
- Inspectors verified
Claire Crumpton
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Name on report verified
Childminder report
- URN verified
EY438655
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentInadequate
- Quality of educationInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The childminder does not know what to do, in line with local safeguarding partnership procedures, if she has child protection concerns. p.2
- They do not know what they must do if they have child protection concerns. p.2
- Children's individual needs are not met, and their welfare is not maintained. p.2
- The childminder and her assistant have poor knowledge and understanding of safeguarding. p.2
- The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Health & safety6
“However, hygiene practices are poor.” p.3Communication & language4
“The childminder uses positional language.” p.2Parents & families3
“Parents report that the childminder knows their children well.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 990
- about usual (typical 899)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 56, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
The provision is inadequate
Children's individual needs are not met, and their welfare is not maintained. The childminder allows others to smoke in her home and there is an overwhelming smell of smoke. The childminder has not considered the detrimental effects of passive smoking upon children's health. The childminder and her assistant have poor knowledge and understanding of safeguarding. They do not know what they must do if they have child protection concerns. As a result, children are not kept safe.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
The childminder does not plan activities with a clear purpose to meet children's next steps in learning. The childminder and her assistant often do things for children rather than supporting them to learn how to do things themselves. For example, when children try to tie a teddy bear's shoelaces, the childminder says they 'can't do it'. She asks her assistant to tie the laces for them. Children do not have the opportunity to overcome difficulties they may face to learn new skills.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Despite this, children form secure attachments with the childminder and her assistant. Children play contentedly alongside them. They confidently share their thoughts and ideas with the childminder and her assistant. The childminder understands some of children's likes and dislikes. She helps them to play with things they enjoy, such as magnets. Children delight in using magnets to push and pull the toy trains. The childminder uses positional language. For example, she asks, 'Can you see if the train goes under the bridge?' This extends children's mathematical understanding.
p.2
need to do better?
n Children's safety and well-being are not promoted. The childminder has some basic understanding of possible signs and symptoms of abuse. However, she does not understand a wide range of safeguarding issues, for example the 'Prevent' duty and county lines. This puts children at risk of harm. The childminder does not know what to do, in line with local safeguarding partnership procedures, if she has child protection concerns. She allows others to smoke on the premises. This does not support children's good health or keep them safe. n The childminder does not consider what she wants children to learn from the activities she provides. Activities do not help children to achieve the next steps in their learning and development. Children do not have opportunities to be creative and develop their own ideas. For example, when children want to use glue to make a greetings card, the childminder tells them they cannot use the
p.2
need to do better?
glue for that activity. This restricts children's learning experiences. n Overall, the childminder and her assistant support children's communication and
p.2
need to do better?
12 July 2022 language skills. For example, the childminder teaches children the meaning of the word 'shrub'. This helps children to learn new words. The childminder and her assistant ask questions as children play. However, they do not give children enough time to think about their reply. They often answer for children. As a result, children do not make the good progress of which they are capable. n The childminder and her assistant have some understanding of children's individual needs. They respond appropriately when children are tired or hungry. However, the childminder does not plan to develop children's independence. For example, she stores tissues out of reach of children. When children need to blow their nose, she does this for them. Children do not have opportunities to sit at a table during mealtimes. They do not develop the skills they need to feed themselves using cutlery. This is because meals are taken in an armchair in the
p.2
need to do better?
living room. This does not prepare children for the next stage of their learning, such as starting school. n Children learn about the importance of good oral hygiene. The childminder provides information packs to parents, including a reward chart. However, hygiene practices are poor. The childminder does not promote good handwashing routines. She does not wash her hands after blowing children's noses. Children and visitors use the same towel after handwashing. This does not promote the good health of children and is likely to increase the risk of the spread of infection. n The childminder does not fulfil all her key responsibilities, especially in relation to the management of the setting, safeguarding children and providing quality education. That said, she has recently begun liaising more closely with the local authority. The childminder keeps her own and her assistant's mandatory qualifications updated, including paediatric first aid. However, she does not
p.3
need to do better?
complete professional development opportunities which ensure the continuous improvement of the care and education she provides. n Parents report that the childminder knows their children well. During the COVID- 19 pandemic, the childminder offered flexible care to help parents with their childcare needs.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
The childminder and her assistant do not understand a wide range of safeguarding issues. They have some basic understanding of possible signs and symptoms of abuse. However, they do not understand the correct procedures to be followed if they have concerns about a child. They do not understand the local safeguarding partnership procedures. This puts children at risk of harm. The childminder allows others to smoke on the premises. This does not support children's good health.
p.3
Due date
ensure that no person smokes on the premises when children are, or soon will be, in attendance 14/08/2022
p.4
Due date
gain a better understanding of current safeguarding issues and local reporting procedures 14/08/2022
p.4
Due date
take steps to prevent the spread of infection and keep children safe and well, for example by developing effective handwashing procedures 14/08/2022
p.4
Due date
strengthen the arrangements for training, staff supervisions, coaching and support to ensure these promote the continuous improvement of the quality of care and education provided. 14/08/2022
p.4
Due date
consider the individual needs, interests and developmental stages of children when planning and delivering learning opportunities, so that they build upon what children already know and can do 14/08/2022
p.4
Due date
improve understanding of how to support and extend children's communication and language skills, including allowing children enough time to think and respond to questions. 14/08/2022
p.4
should:
n support children to develop their independence by encouraging them to try and complete tasks themselves.
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number EY438655 Local authority Rotherham Inspection number 10218674 Type of provision Childminder
p.5
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register Day care type Childminder
p.5
inspection
Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 8 Date of previous inspection 11 August 2016
p.5
Information about this early years setting
The childminder registered in 2011 and lives in Dinnington, Rotherham. She operates from 5am to 8pm Monday to Friday all year round, except for bank holidays and family holidays. The childminder holds an appropriate qualification at level 3 and works with an assistant. She provides funded early education for two-, three- and four-year-old children.
p.5
Inspection activities
n This was the first routine inspection the childminder received since the COVID- 19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the childminder and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the setting. n The inspector viewed the provision and discussed the safety and suitability of the premises. n Children spoke to the inspector about what they enjoy doing while with the childminder. n The inspector observed the quality of education being provided, indoors and outdoors, and assessed the impact that this was having on children's learning. n The inspector observed the interactions between the childminder and children. n Parents shared their views of the setting with the inspector. n The childminder provided the inspector with a sample of key documentation on request.
p.6
Inspection activities
We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.6
Inspection activities
12 July 2022 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
Inspection activities
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspection activities
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.7
Inspection activities
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspection activities
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion