Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Social care inspection (SCCIF)

Linden Bridge School

Inspected 16 Jun 2022 · published 8 Oct 2022 · URN SC013884

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    16 Jun 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    Matt Nicholls

  • Helped and protected verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    KT4 7JW

  • Name on report verified

    Linden Bridge School

  • URN verified

    SC013884

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2021.

  • OverallGood
  • Helped and protectedGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+82Very positivemore positive than 93% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisehighly skilledhappypositiveclearsupportivesafeextremelyeffective
Criticismconcerns

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings786w+81
  • What needs to improve56w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
840
shorter than usual (typical 1609)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 43
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 65%What needs to improve 5%About the inspection 30%

Full report text

Inspection report for residential special school – Linden Bridge School 1 Linden Bridge School Linden Bridge School, Grafton Road, Worcester Park, Surrey KT4 7JW Residential provision inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this residential special school

This residential special school is part of a multi-academy trust, for children with autism spectrum disorder and associated complex communication needs. The residential accommodation is provided on the first floor of the main school building. It has capacity for 16 children. At the time of this inspection, a total of 36 children were using the residential provision. Each child stays for two nights during the school week.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

children and young people, taking into account

p.1

good

How well children and young people are helped and protected good

p.1

good

The effectiveness of leaders and managers good

p.1

good

The residential special school provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.

p.1

good

Date of previous inspection: 11 May 2021

p.1

good

Overall judgement at last inspection: good Inspection report for residential special school – Linden Bridge School 2

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Children are happy and settled during their residential stays. Developing children’s independent skills is at the forefront of staff practice. This has led to some children accessing university, performing roles in local politics and, for others, being able to live independently.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Parents are keen to stress that without residential their children may not have friendships or be able to accept other people. Through fun activities, community trips and daily talk time after school, children learn valuable social skills which enrich their enjoyment of the world around them.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Staff know the children and have a deep understanding of their needs. Staff treat each child as an individual and understand their different starting points.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Relationships between staff and children are very positive. Children are clear on their plans for the day and are keen to participate in all the extra curriculum activities on offer.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Parents and professionals are overwhelmingly positive about the communication they receive from staff. One parent told the inspector, ‘Boarding is the only time when the family relax and settle, as we know our child is safe and cared for.’

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Staff support children through the student council in order to ensure that their wishes and feelings are at the forefront of decisions made about the residential provision. This gives children a sense of belonging and acceptance.

p.2

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Children are happy and want to attend their residential stays. Children feel cared for physically and emotionally. Children who often find it difficult to trust others give devoted staff their trust, and this is reciprocated. As a result, children are able to better manage their emotions.

p.2

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Some children have complex medical conditions. Staff are aware of children’s health plans and work closely with nurses and parents to ensure that children stay healthy.

p.2

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Staff understand children’s risks well. For example, on one rare occasion, a child was able to leave the school grounds without consent, but the quick thinking of the staff meant the child was found within minutes.

p.2

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Although staff know the children extremely well, children’s care plans can be confusing, with information captured in multiple documents. Behavioural plans do not give parents the full explanation of what strategies are being used to support their child. Parents are asked to sign and agree to plans without having a full knowledge Inspection report for residential special school – Linden Bridge School 3 and understanding of the purpose of the measure. For example, a parent was not given a full explanation of how a ‘safe space’ was used in the care of their child.

p.2

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Clear rules and boundaries are in place and children know these and respect them. Children follow routines carefully and staff are committed to ensure that these are not disrupted. This enables children to feel secure and cared about.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

There is now in place a committed and supportive team led by the trust. A supportive head of care has ensured that changes in the residential provision have been kept to the minimum despite several external pressures. Staff enjoy working in residential, they feel well trained and well supported. As a result, children have benefited from having the continuity of a highly skilled team of staff supporting them.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Leaders effectively manage risk, for example they have developed the site to keep children safe by improving fences, adding new door locks, and increasing the staff support for the children.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

The independent visitor regularly visits the residential provision. Reports are clear and detailed and cover a wide range of areas. These reports are presented to senior leaders and the principal is held accountable in order to ensure that recommendations are acted on swiftly.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

The residential provision has benefited from a large, local multi-academy trust working in partnership with the school. The maintenance of the school site and recruitment of staff has benefitted from an additional layer of scrutiny.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

When concerns are raised regarding staff practice, leaders respond quickly and involve external agencies appropriately. Leaders take the advice of agencies and, when required, carry out investigations and take onboard any learning. This open culture ensures that children continue to receive a high standard of care. Inspection report for residential special school – Linden Bridge School 4

p.3

Recommendations

 Leaders and managers should ensure that records to be clearer on staff responses, staff are clear on their roles but have commented on several documents repeating information.  Leaders and managers should ensure that behaviour plans, where they involve parents’ input, need to ensure that parents have the full information before they agree to plans.

p.4

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Children Act 1989 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the national minimum standards. Inspection report for residential special school – Linden Bridge School 5

p.4

Residential special school details

Social care unique reference number: SC013884

p.5

Residential special school details

Headteacher/teacher in charge: Ms Vanessa Wallden

p.5

Residential special school details

Type of school: Residential special school

p.5

Residential special school details

Email address: info@lindenbridge.thpt.org.uk

p.5

Inspector

Matt Nicholls, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for residential special school – Linden Bridge School 6 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.5

Inspector

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk.

p.6

Inspector

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk.

p.6

Inspector

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn.

p.6

Inspector

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion