Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Burrowmoor Primary School
Summary
Isabel Davis (lead), Jacqueline Bell-Cook, Jane Dooley
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
15 Jun 2022
- Inspectors verified
Isabel Davis, Jacqueline Bell-Cook, Jane Dooley
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Early years verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Inadequate
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Postcode verified
PE15 9RP
- Name on report verified
Burrowmoor Primary School
- URN verified
139843
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Early yearsInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentInadequate
- Quality of educationInadequate
3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Consequences for poor behaviour are not consistently managed or followed through. p.2
- This is starting to have an impact, but actions taken have been too slow to address the significant weaknesses identified. p.3
- Serious incidents are not always followed up with suitable, timely actions. p.3
- Trustees have not acted swiftly enough to address the weaknesses in the safeguarding arrangements. p.4
- The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Leaders must ensure that all staff are trained so they understand their safeguarding responsibilities. p.4
- Leaders must ensure that all staff are trained to implement the curriculum as leaders intend. p.4
- Leaders must then ensure that all staff working with pupils at an early stage of reading have the expertise to best support them. p.4
- Leaders must monitor the new reading curriculum to check that it is having the impact leaders intend. p.4
- Leaders must make sure that staff are trained to correctly identify pupils with SEND and then are able to carry out the review process. p.4
- Leaders must implement and monitor a behaviour management approach that is p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Reading & phonics7
“The reading curriculum is inconsistently planned and delivered.” p.4SEND & inclusion6
“Expectations of how well pupils with SEND achieve are too low.” p.3Progress & outcomes4
“Expectations of how well pupils with SEND achieve are too low.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,508
- about usual (typical 1552)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 52, typical 53
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 6
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Burrowmoor Primary School Burrowmoor Road, March, Cambridgeshire PE15 9RP
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Early years provision Inadequate Previous inspection grade Requires improvement 14 and 15 June 2022
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils at Burrowmoor School are not receiving a quality of education that prepares them well for the next stage of their learning. The current curriculum is not ensuring that pupils have the appropriate skills and knowledge for their age.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils’ attitude to learning and their behaviour are often not positive. This is because leaders’ expectations are too low. This includes those of the most vulnerable pupils and pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND).
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Bullying and name-calling are too common. Although staff usually deal with such matters, these are continuing. Pupils do not always feel safe. Concerns raised by pupils are not followed up sufficiently well.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Most pupils enjoy their learning, but this is regularly interrupted by incidents of poor behaviour. The significant minority of pupils who disrupt learning defy requests and instructions. Consequences for poor behaviour are not consistently managed or followed through.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils like the clubs that are on offer, such as those for football and rugby. Pupils are excited about opportunities to have wider experiences, such as their trip to a zoo. Some older pupils take on extra responsibilities, including joining the school council and supporting younger pupils at lunchtimes.
p.2
better?
Leaders have not addressed the areas for improvement identified at the previous inspection. Overall, the curriculum is still at a very early stage of development, with some aspects still being reviewed. In most subjects, learning for pupils is not broken down into small steps of knowledge that pupils need to learn, and nor does it build on previous learning. Consequently, pupils find it difficult to remember and apply new knowledge and skills. While leaders have identified the areas of the curriculum that need reviewing, it has not happened quickly enough to ensure that pupils achieve well.
p.2
better?
The teaching of reading is not well thought through. Too many pupils are not able to read well by the time they reach key stage 2. Pupils who have fallen behind are not accurately identified so they can be supported to catch up. The newly implemented phonics scheme is not aligned with the reading curriculum in early years or key stage 2. As a result, pupils do not learn to read well enough. Books are not well matched to each pupil’s stage of reading. Consequently, pupils are not able to apply what they know in order to be successful.
p.2
better?
Children in early years are keen to learn and explore the learning environment. However, the planned learning is not ambitious enough. Opportunities for rehearsing and embedding important knowledge are not planned in. Staff are kind and caring 14 and 15 June 2022
p.2
3
towards the pupils, but have not received the necessary training to provide effective learning opportunities to prepare children well for key stage 1.
p.3
3
Pupils with SEND are not having their needs accurately identified and met. Pupils’ targets are not specific enough for pupils to make the precise steps of progress they need in order to achieve well. Some pupils are placed in smaller groups with support staff. These pupils are not accessing the full curriculum because they can choose whether they want to complete their work or not. Expectations of how well pupils with SEND achieve are too low. Staff working with these pupils have not been trained well enough to be able to support pupils effectively to ensure that they can be successful.
p.3
3
The behaviour of pupils around school is not good. Too many pupils report incidents of discriminatory, homophobic and sexualised language being used. Leaders are aware of some of this behaviour, but do not have an accurate picture of how widespread it is. The curriculum content is not addressing these issues or enabling pupils to have an understanding of protected characteristics or respectful relationships.
p.3
3
Pupils enjoy the range of clubs and trips that leaders have planned. Visitors are invited in to inspire pupils. These include sporting role models, such as a successful Paralympian. Pupils are keen to take on responsibilities, but this is not open to all pupils due to their conduct in school. Most older pupils know that they need to be positive role models. Pupils value fairness and want school rules to be more consistent.
p.3
3
Trust leaders have worked with leaders over an extended period and have undertaken some recent leadership changes. This is starting to have an impact, but actions taken have been too slow to address the significant weaknesses identified. Trust leaders have an overly positive view of the standards across the school. They have not been rigorous enough in their appraisal of the curriculum, standards of behaviour or safeguarding. As a result, leaders are not providing an adequate standard of education for the pupils.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders are not keeping pupils physically or emotionally safe in school. Serious incidents are not always followed up with suitable, timely actions. Leaders do not have adequate systems in place to check that the agreed actions have happened or that support is having an impact.
p.3
Safeguarding
Staff have received training and know how to record concerns. However, systems do not clearly show who takes responsibility for following up any concerns raised. Assumptions have been made that someone is dealing with an issue and consequently, concerns have not been addressed. 14 and 15 June 2022
p.3
4
Pre-employment checks are in place for staff who work with pupils.
p.4
4
Trustees have not acted swiftly enough to address the weaknesses in the safeguarding arrangements.
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Appropriate safeguarding processes are not in place. Consequently, not all concerns are followed up appropriately. Leaders must ensure that there is a robust and rigorous system for checking that incidents are followed up and necessary referrals are made in the appropriate way. Leaders must ensure that all staff are trained so they understand their safeguarding responsibilities. The curriculum has not been well thought through to ensure that pupils from early years to Year 6 are ready for the next stage of their learning. As a result, pupils do not know and remember more over time. Leaders must fully review the curriculum and act on their findings to ensure it clearly sets out the expectations for each year group. Leaders must ensure that all staff are trained to implement the curriculum as leaders intend. The reading curriculum is inconsistently planned and delivered. As a result, too many pupils across the school cannot read well enough. Leaders must develop
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
and implement a reading curriculum that builds from early years to ensure that pupils are ready for key stage 2. Leaders must then ensure that all staff working with pupils at an early stage of reading have the expertise to best support them. Leaders must monitor the new reading curriculum to check that it is having the impact leaders intend. A significant number of pupils with SEND are not having their needs identified or being given targets that are specific enough. Leaders must make sure that staff are trained to correctly identify pupils with SEND and then are able to carry out the review process. Leaders must then monitor the provision for pupils with SEND to ensure that pupils achieve well. The behaviour policy is not being applied consistently. Over time, learning is being disrupted by pupils displaying challenging, disruptive and abusive behaviours. Leaders must implement and monitor a behaviour management approach that is
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
clear and understood by pupils and staff. Leaders must ensure that staff have appropriate training to be able to consistently implement the approach to improve pupils’ behaviour. The current curriculum content is not teaching pupils to understand mutual respect and tolerance. Therefore, derogatory language is being commonly used by pupils. Leaders must revise and monitor the personal, social and health education (PSHE) curriculum to ensure that pupils are taught about and understand differences. Leaders must ensure that all staff are trained to understand that a culture allowing homophobic and sexualised behaviour is not acceptable. 14 and 15 June 2022
p.4
5
Improvements to the curriculum and behaviour have not been rapid enough. Consequently, pupils are not receiving an adequate quality of education. Additional capacity in leadership must urgently be sought to bring about the necessary improvements to effect immediate change across the school. Having considered the evidence, I strongly recommend that leaders and those responsible for governance do not seek to appoint early career teachers.
p.5
How can I feed back my views?
to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.5
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.5
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.5
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.5
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 14 and 15 June 2022
p.5
School details
Inspection number 10227404 Type of school Primary
p.6
School details
Headteacher Kate Coates (Executive Headteacher)
p.6
School details
Date of previous inspection 8 June 2021, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.6
Information about this school
The headteacher is also the executive headteacher at Kingsfield Primary Academy. The headteacher has been in post since March 2022. The school has had an interim executive board (IEB) since January 2021. The school has a Nursery provision for two-year-old children. The school operates a breakfast and after-school provision for pupils who attend the school.
p.6
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.6
Information about this inspection
In accordance with section 44(1) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires special measures because it is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the persons responsible for leading, managing or governing the school are not demonstrating the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. 14 and 15 June 2022
p.6
7
This was the first routine inspection the school had received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders, and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors met with the executive headteacher, the head of school, the director of education for the trust, the special educational needs coordinator, the curriculum leader and the inclusion leader. Inspectors also met with the acting chief executive officer of the trust and three members of the IEB, including the chair. Inspectors carried out deep dives in reading, mathematics, science, design and technology, and physical education. For each deep dive, inspectors met with subject leaders, looked at curriculum plans, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors met with curriculum leaders, staff and pupils during the course of the
p.7
7
inspection. Inspectors also looked at curriculum plans and spoke to leaders about PSHE, relationships and sex education and the provision for pupils with SEND. Inspectors visited the breakfast club and spoke to parents and carers during the morning drop-off. To inspect safeguarding, inspectors checked the school’s single central record of recruitment and vetting checks, considered its safeguarding policy, looked at pupils’ safeguarding files, and spoke to the designated safeguarding leads. Inspectors also spoke to pupils and staff about safety and safeguarding arrangements at the school. Inspectors reviewed a wide range of school information, including documents on the school’s website, leaders’ improvement plans and their self-evaluation of the school, and curriculum plans. Inspectors considered 19 responses to Ofsted’s online survey for staff. They also considered 46 responses to Ofsted Parent View from this academic year, including
p.7
7
46 free-text responses submitted during the inspection.
p.7
Inspection team
Isabel Davis, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
Jane Dooley Ofsted Inspector 14 and 15 June 2022
p.7
8
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
8
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
8
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
8
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
8
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion