Schools & FE · School monitoring visit
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
19 Jul 2022
- Inspectorssingle source
Adam Cooke
- Postcode verified
CO13 0AZ
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Safeguarding2
“Safeguarding is effective.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 863
- shorter than usual (typical 1570)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Michelle Hughes Executive Headteacher Tendring Technology College Rochford Way Frinton-on-Sea Essex CO13 0AZ
p.1
Serious weaknesses first monitoring inspection of Tendring Technology College
Following my visit to your school on 19 July 2022, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the outcome and inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken since the school’s most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Serious weaknesses first monitoring inspection of Tendring Technology College
The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to have serious weaknesses. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Serious weaknesses first monitoring inspection of Tendring Technology College
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. I discussed the ongoing impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in my evaluation.
p.1
Serious weaknesses first monitoring inspection of Tendring Technology College
Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:
p.1
responsible for governance are taking effective action towards the removal of
The school’s improvement plans are fit for purpose.
p.1
responsible for governance are taking effective action towards the removal of
I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer or equivalent of the Academies Enterprise multi-academy trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Essex. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website. Yours sincerely
p.1
Context
Since the previous inspection, the Academies Enterprise multi-academies trust (the trust) has replaced the local governing body with an interim standards board to hold leaders more firmly to account. The interim standards board comprises representatives from the trust and from the local authority. There is a new executive headteacher. A new principal has been appointed and is due to take up post in September 2022.
p.3
designation
Leaders, trustees and governors share an ambitious vision for Tendring Technology College. Since the previous inspection, they have established rigorous systems of accountability. Trustees and governors make regular checks on how well leaders’ actions secure improvement.
p.3
designation
Leaders and the trust have provided suitable training for all staff around the construction of the curriculum. Teachers have a clearer understanding of the knowledge pupils need to learn. This knowledge links more logically to what they have learned before. Pupils are remembering and using more of their learning than they did previously. Teachers are starting to check and identify what pupils know and what they do not. Much of this work is new; teachers are becoming more confident in teaching the new curriculum.
p.3
designation
Leaders have constructed a more coherent curriculum for personal, social and health education (PSHE). They have ensured that there is a greater focus on teaching pupils how to develop positive, healthy relationships. Leaders have allocated more teaching time for PSHE at key stage 3. Although not currently in place, from September 2022, pupils in key stage 4 will also have more time to study PSHE.
p.3
designation
Leaders have introduced a new system of managing pupil behaviour which staff and pupils understand well. Pupils know the consequences of negative behaviour. Leaders have adopted restorative approaches to managing behaviour. Pupils are aware of how their words and actions may affect others. Pupils can make amends for less positive behaviours. Staff and pupils agree that behaviour has improved. Pupils and staff attribute this to most teachers’ consistent application of the behaviour systems. Pupils’ behaviour across the two sites is generally calm and orderly.
p.3
designation
Reported incidents of homophobic bullying have fallen. Pupils report that homophobic comments among the school community have declined. Most pupils think that bullying is rare, and adults deal with it swiftly and appropriately when it happens. Leaders are supporting pupils who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBTQ+) better than was previously the case. As a result of this, LGBTQ+ pupils say they feel safer. They have a stronger voice within the school community. They raise awareness about what it is like to be an LGBTQ+ pupil at the school. Leaders have high expectations around ensuring an even more respectful and inclusive ethos within the school and local community.
p.3
designation
Leaders ensure that staff receive regular safeguarding training. Staff understand the local risks that pupils may face. Through recent assemblies, pupils are aware of how to identify peer-on-peer abuse and how to respond and report it. There are robust systems in the school to ensure timely reporting of concerns. Leaders intervene quickly so that pupils receive the support they need. Pupils say they feel safe. Safeguarding is effective.
p.4
designation
The trust has provided considerable support to ensure that leaders focus on the right priorities to make rapid and sustained improvement. There has been much to do to change the very negative perceptions of the school among staff, pupils and the local community. Leaders now actively seek the views of stakeholders. They have communicated their plans to ensure a better quality of education. Teachers are happier and feel that leaders now listen and take into account their well-being. Staff appreciate the training and support they have received, reporting that ‘we are now working together’ and ‘leaders have made a big difference’. Some teachers who had left the school have returned. Change has been rapid but leaders know they must be relentless in their pursuit of changing hearts and minds. They are in a good place to do so.
p.4
Additional support
The multi-academy trust has provided training and support in curriculum development and leadership and management. Leaders have appreciated the impact of this work.
p.4
Evidence
The inspector observed the school’s work, scrutinised documents and met with the chief executive officer, the director of education for the multi-academy trust, the chair of the interim standards board, the interim executive headteacher, the executive headteacher, the principal, other senior leaders, staff and pupils.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion