Early years · Early years complaint outcome
Lanefields Day Nursery
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
22 Sept 2022
- URN verified
311393
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 374
- longer than usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 12%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage . If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right. On 2 September 2022, we received concerns that this provider was not meeting some of these requirements. On 21 September 2022, we carried out an unannounced regulatory visit. We found that the nursery does not have suitable arrangements to dispose of soiled nappies hygienically; risk assessments are not always carried out effectively. In this instance, a bottle of washing up liquid was left within children's reach; one of the fire doors which provides an exit route in the event of an emergency is difficult to open. In addition, once outside, the exit route is not kept clear. We also found that the manager had not followed their safeguarding policy and procedures when concerns were raised with them about a child. Following this visit, we issued the
p.1
Summary of outcome
provider with a Notice to Improve (NTI) The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Summary of outcome
ensure there are suitable hygienic facilities for the disposal of nappies
p.1
Summary of outcome
implement risk assessments effectively to remove or minimise hazards to children, and take all reasonable steps to ensure staff and children are not exposed to risks
p.1
Summary of outcome
take reasonable steps to ensure the safety of children, staff and others on the premises in the case of fire or any other emergency, and ensure fire exits are clearly identifiable, free of obstruction and easily opened from the inside
p.1
Summary of outcome
support managers to implement the policy, and procedures, to safeguard children, in line with the guidance and procedures of the relevant local safeguarding partners (LSP) so that they take prompt and appropriate action if there are safeguarding concerns about a child, or in the event of an allegation being made against a member of staff.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years. For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.1
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion