Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Willowbrook School
Summary
Sue Costello (lead), Jane Dhillon, Matthew Shirley
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
29 Jun 2022
- Inspectors verified
Jane Dhillon, Matthew Shirley, Sue Costello
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
EX4 8NN
- Name on report verified
Willowbrook School
- URN verified
132778
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- However, there are still too many weaknesses, including in early reading and mathematics. p.2
- Leaders and staff do not have consistently high expectations for all pupils. p.4
- However, some weaknesses persist in a few curriculum subjects, including mathematics and early reading. p.2
- Some pupils’ writing is poor. 28 and 29 June 2022 p.2
- Some key weaknesses, including in the reading and mathematics curriculums, have not been identified. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Subject curriculums are not consistently well matched to pupils’ abilities and some staff lack the knowledge they need to undertake their roles effectively. p.2
- Some pupils who need to catch up cannot recall number facts well enough. p.3
- Leaders must ensure that staff are equipped with secure subject knowledge and a sound pedagogy. p.4
- Should any bullying occur, pupils trust adults to deal with it swiftly. p.2
- Teachers need to support pupils to improve their writing swiftly when p.4
- Leaders need to check that the curriculum intent is implemented consistently so that pupils achieve success. 28 and 29 June 2022 p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance19
“Leaders and staff do not have consistently high expectations for all pupils.” p.4Teaching & assessment5
“However, the teaching of phonics is inconsistent.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,088
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 23%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Willowbrook School Summer Lane, Beacon Heath, Exeter, Devon EX4 8NN
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Requires improvement 28 and 29 June 2022
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils like Willowbrook and feel safe in the care of trusted adults. They learn all the subjects in the national curriculum. Leaders have improved some aspects of the school’s curriculum. However, there are still too many weaknesses, including in early reading and mathematics. Leaders do not have sufficiently high expectations of all pupils. Subject curriculums are not consistently well matched to pupils’ abilities and some staff lack the knowledge they need to undertake their roles effectively. This hampers pupils’ learning.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils understand the school’s behaviour expectations and follow the ‘Willowbrook Way’ with pride. Staff enforce the school behaviour system consistently. Consequently, pupils feel that they are treated with fairness. At times, some pupils attend the school’s ‘learning hub’. This is designed to help pupils manage their behaviour and to enjoy a bespoke curriculum. Bullying is rare. Should any bullying occur, pupils trust adults to deal with it swiftly. Leaders are working with families and other professionals to improve pupils’ attendance, particularly the high rates of repeated absence.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Staff provide a range of wider curriculum experiences to appeal to most pupils’ interests, including art, music and sport. Pupils speak enthusiastically about playing and performing in concerts and assemblies.
p.2
better?
There have been several changes to the school leadership since the previous inspection. Leaders have used help and advice from the local authority to make some curriculum improvements. Subjects, such as science, history and physical education (PE), have suitably ambitious curriculums. However, some weaknesses persist in a few curriculum subjects, including mathematics and early reading. Progress in these areas has been delayed by the impact of COVID-19, but also by leaders’ overly optimistic self-evaluations.
p.2
better?
Leaders have put in place a suitable phonics curriculum to teach early reading. However, the teaching of phonics is inconsistent. Children in the early years get off to a flying start in reading and using vocabulary. Knowledgeable staff read, sing and recite nursery rhymes to children. This is helping the youngest children to develop their communication and language well. This strong start slows in key stage 1. Some pupils, who remain at the early stages of reading, are supported by adults who have not received appropriate training. This results in pupils, in key stages 1 and 2, repeating mistakes and using unhelpful strategies to read words. Early readers in key stage 2 are developing a love of reading through inspiring class texts and the diverse range of books available in the well-stocked library.
p.2
better?
The early writing curriculum is not sequenced well. It does not allow pupils enough time to consolidate current learning before moving on. Some pupils’ writing is poor. 28 and 29 June 2022
p.2
3
They make mistakes in their letter formation and spelling that are not acknowledged by adults. Consequently, these errors persist.
p.3
3
Leaders have not put in place a suitably ambitious mathematics curriculum. Some pupils who need to catch up cannot recall number facts well enough. This means they lack the mathematical understanding needed to tackle basic calculations. Other pupils do not have sufficient opportunities to apply their understanding to problems or explain their understanding. Leaders do not use assessment well enough to find out what some pupils know and understand. Consequently, gaps in pupils’ learning are not being systematically addressed. Some stronger mathematicians find mathematics to easy. Too often, they repeat what they have learned before.
p.3
3
Leaders have prioritised support for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Staff identify pupils who may have additional learning needs swiftly. Children in the early years receive additional attention from specialist staff. The learning hub provides helpful pastoral and educational support for some pupils. Occasionally though, when the classroom curriculum does not meet their needs, some pupils with SEND become distracted.
p.3
3
Many aspects of pupils’ character are developed well. Leaders encourage pupils’ sense of civic duty. Pupils’ interests and talents are nurtured by the school. Pupils learn how to be physically healthy. They learn much of what makes a healthy relationship. Pupils understand most aspects of diversity and equality. They debate issues, including spiritual and moral dilemmas, in a mature, considered way.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders make suitable checks to ensure that adults are safe to work with children. They provide training for staff. Staff identify potential signs of abuse and understand that everybody is responsible for keeping pupils safe. Leaders speak knowledgeably about managing allegations. They ensure that pupils and families receive the help they need. Staff work in partnership with other professionals to provide appropriate support.
p.3
Safeguarding
Pupils understand how to keep safe, including online.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Leaders do not have an accurate picture of the quality of education. Some key weaknesses, including in the reading and mathematics curriculums, have not been identified. This means that some pupils are not learning well enough. Leaders need to check that the curriculum intent is implemented consistently so that pupils achieve success. 28 and 29 June 2022
p.3
4
Leaders and staff do not have consistently high expectations for all pupils. Too often, staff do not adapt the curriculum to match pupils’ abilities. This results in some pupils becoming distracted or bored. Leaders need to check that all pupils are receiving a suitably ambitious curriculum. Leaders have introduced a scheme for teaching early reading. However, beyond the early years, some staff lack the subject knowledge and pedagogy required to teach reading effectively. This results in some pupils not reading as well as they could. Leaders must ensure that staff are equipped with secure subject knowledge and a sound pedagogy. Teachers do not identify and address pupils’ misconceptions in spelling and letter formation consistently. Consequently, mistakes persist and sometimes become embedded in pupils’ practice. This is detrimental to the overall quality of pupils’ writing. Teachers need to support pupils to improve their writing swiftly when
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 28 and 29 June 2022
p.4
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection 11 and 12 July 2018
p.5
Information about this school
The school uses no alternative provision. The school nursery admits three-year-old children. Since the last inspection, there has been a governance review.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.5
Information about this inspection
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with school leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation. Inspectors did deep dives in early reading, mathematics, PE and history. This included discussions with subject leaders, lesson visits, looking at examples of work, discussions with teachers, discussions with pupils and listening to pupils read to an adult. They also considered evidence gathered about the science curriculum. 28 and 29 June 2022
p.5
6
Inspectors held meetings with the headteacher, deputy headteacher, curriculum leaders, the leader for SEND, staff and governors, including the chair of the local governing board. The lead inspector spoke with the local authority school effectiveness adviser. Inspectors scrutinised a range of documentation provided by the school, including leaders’ self-evaluation, risk assessments, improvement plans and documentation relating to behaviour. Inspectors examined safeguarding records, checked staff’s safeguarding knowledge and spoke with pupils. Inspectors also met with the designated safeguarding lead. Inspectors considered the 75 responses to the online survey, Ofsted Parent View, and free-text comments. They also took into consideration responses to the staff and pupil surveys.
p.6
Inspection team
Sue Costello, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Matthew Shirley Ofsted Inspector 28 and 29 June 2022
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion