Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Port Isaac Community Primary School

Inspected 6 Jul 2022 · published 21 Sept 2022 · URN 111912

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Jonathan Gower (lead), Richard Light

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    6 Jul 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    Jonathan Gower, Richard Light

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Inadequate

  • Early years verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Inadequate

  • Quality of education verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    PL29 3RT

  • Name on report verified

    Port Isaac Community Primary School

  • URN verified

    111912

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
  • Early yearsInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentInadequate
  • Quality of educationInadequate

3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−37Criticalmore positive than 37% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoyeffectivelyfeel safecaringimprovedeffectivesafeconfident
Criticismtoo manyconcernspoorgapsineffectiveweaknessespoorlyunclear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1168w−41
  • Safeguarding90w+1

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,222
shorter than usual (typical 1552)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 59, typical 53
Average sentence
11 words
Next steps
6
typical 6
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 63%Safeguarding 5%About the inspection 32%

Full report text

Inspection of Port Isaac Community Primary School Mayfield Road, Port Isaac, Cornwall PL29 3RT

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Early years provision Inadequate Previous inspection grade Good 5 and 6 July 2022

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are let down by the quality of education they receive. The curriculum is ineffective. Leaders have not identified the main priorities for improvement. They have not addressed long-standing issues such as poor attendance. Leaders do not engage well enough with parents.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils at Port Isaac want to learn. They listen to their teachers and do what they are asked. They enjoy challenges but would like more. Pupils enjoy coming to school. They say they feel safe. Pupils say that staff are kind and treat them fairly. However, too many pupils are repeatedly absent from school. This slows their progress and means that they miss large parts of their primary education. Leaders do not challenge this well enough.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils get on well with one another. The school responds to any concerns about bullying. Pupils say that bullying rarely happens. They play together well at breaktimes and enjoy using the well-equipped playground and school grounds. Pupils like taking on responsibilities such as caring for the school dog. They enjoy extra activities such as the lunchtime reading club.

p.2

better?

Leaders, including governors, do not know the strengths and weaknesses of the school. Their ambition for pupils’ education is too low. Governors do not ensure that statutory requirements are met. They do not hold leaders to account for the quality of pupils’ education, which is poor. Leaders do not provide parents with enough information about their child’s education.

p.2

better?

Leaders receive extensive support from the local authority. They have used this to make some changes in the past few months. For example, staff have improved the learning environment in the Nursery. However, these changes are very recent, and it is too soon to see any real impact.

p.2

better?

The curriculum is poorly designed. Leaders have not identified the important knowledge that pupils need to learn. Leaders have not thought about the order that key knowledge will be taught in. Pupils do not build knowledge well over time. For example, in mathematics, pupils have large gaps in their understanding. Leaders have not considered how to use assessment effectively. Pupils are not helped to remember what they have learned. Many subject leaders are new to their roles. They do not understand pupils’ needs or the subject curriculum well enough.

p.2

better?

Reading is not prioritised. Too many pupils do not learn to read well enough. This holds them back with their learning in all areas of the curriculum. Pupils who have fallen behind do not receive effective support. Leaders are unclear about their expectations for the youngest pupils in the school. Too many pupils do not gain a secure understanding of phonics. Leaders have not thought about how to extend 5 and 6 July 2022

p.2

3

pupils’ reading once they are able to read simple texts. Pupils are not helped to build a habit of independent reading.

p.3

3

Leaders have made some improvements to the support for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Until recently, leaders had not supported pupils with SEND well enough. However, there is much more to be done to ensure that learning is adapted to meet pupils’ needs.

p.3

3

When the Nursery is open, there is better provision for children in the early years, but this is only for part of the week. At other times, pupils in the Reception Year have less expert input. The curriculum in the early years is not designed well. Too many pupils are not prepared for Year 1.

p.3

3

Pupils find it difficult to talk about their learning with confidence. They find it hard to explain their thinking. Pupils usually behave well in lessons and around school. However, their work in books does not show pride or commitment to their learning. This is not helped by leaders’ low expectations. Too many pupils do not attend school often enough. This inhibits their learning of the curriculum significantly.

p.3

3

Pupils appreciate the limited opportunities that leaders provide to develop their character and their social understanding. They are pleased to take on responsibilities in the school and they enjoy the residential programme. However, these opportunities and the curriculum are piecemeal. They do not broaden pupils’ experiences well enough. Pupils’ understanding of people from different backgrounds and of life in modern Britain is not well developed. Their aspirations are limited.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders have put systems in place to keep pupils safe. Governors check the effectiveness of these systems. Leaders carry out the necessary recruitment checks on staff. Leaders work well with external agencies to secure extra support for pupils.

p.3

Safeguarding

Staff understand their safeguarding responsibilities. They know the pupils well. Staff are vigilant and know how to record concerns. Leaders make sure that all staff understand the procedures for keeping pupils safe.

p.3

Safeguarding

Pupils trust the adults in school and feel able to share concerns with them.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Teaching pupils to read is not given a high enough priority. Pupils are not taught to read as well and as widely as they should. Leaders need to ensure that staff 5 and 6 July 2022

p.3

4

receive appropriate training to enable pupils to become confident and enthusiastic readers.  Leaders have not identified the key knowledge that pupils need to learn across all subjects. As a result, pupils receive a jumbled, disconnected series of lessons. Pupils do not progress well through the curriculum. Leaders must identify the component knowledge all pupils need to know and sequence it effectively so that pupils know more and remember more.  Assessment is not used effectively. Teachers are unclear if pupils remember key knowledge. Gaps in pupils’ learning are not identified. Assessment must be used effectively to identify what pupils know and to address any gaps in knowledge.  The approach to supporting pupils’ personal development has not been carefully considered. This means that pupils have significant gaps in their understanding of British values, diversity and equality. Leaders must provide a meaningful

p.4

4

curriculum that prepares pupils well for life in modern Britain.  Leaders do not engage with parents effectively. Parents do not have the necessary information they need to support their child’s learning. Leaders must communicate well so that parents know and understand the school’s ambitions for their children’s education and can support them.  Leaders have not tackled long-standing issues with persistent absence. This means that too many pupils are missing large amounts of their education. Leaders must address this as a matter of urgency so that attendance improves swiftly and pupils make the most of their primary education.  Leaders and those responsible for governance may not appoint early career teachers before the next monitoring inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 5 and 6 July 2022

p.4

School details

Inspection number 10228022 Type of school Primary

p.5

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 21 March 2017, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school is federated with Boscastle Community Primary School.  The executive head of school is responsible for both schools.  The school does not use any alternative provision.  The school has Nursery provision which is currently open three days a week.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

In accordance with section 44(1) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires special measures because it is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the persons responsible for leading, managing or governing the school are not demonstrating the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. 5 and 6 July 2022

p.5

6

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with school leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation.

p.6

6

 Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics, and geography. For each deep dive, inspectors met with subject leaders, discussed the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. The lead inspector listened to pupils read. The lead inspector also considered pupils’ workbooks in science.  Inspectors met with the executive headteacher, subject leaders and with the leader responsible for SEND. The lead inspector met with three representatives of the governing body, including the chair of governors. The lead inspector spoke with two school improvement advisers from the local authority.  The lead inspector scrutinised records and held discussions with leaders about their work to safeguard pupils.  Inspectors analysed school documentation, including leaders’ evaluations and plans for improvement, and paperwork relating to the work of the governing

p.6

6

body. They scrutinised a range of policies and procedures.  Inspectors considered 11 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Ofsted Parent View, including 11 free-text responses from parents, and six responses to the staff survey. There were no responses to the pupil survey. Inspectors met with groups of pupils to hear their views about the school.

p.6

Inspection team

Jonathan Gower, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Richard Light Ofsted Inspector 5 and 6 July 2022

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion