Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Paignton Academy

Inspected 6 Jul 2022 · published 21 Sept 2022 · URN 138863

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    6 Jul 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    David New, Gill Hickling, Sarah Watson, Simon Tong, Steve Taylor, Tracey Reynolds

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    TQ3 3WA

  • Name on report verified

    Paignton Academy

  • URN verified

    138863

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−11Mixedmore positive than 11% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongeffectivelyeffectivewell sequencedfeel safeenjoyenthusiasticsuccessful
Criticismnot alwaysconcernsvariablenot metpoorweaknessesseriouslyyet to

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings940w−15
  • Safeguarding122w+30
  • What needs to improve26w—

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,059
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 53, typical 56
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
18%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 60%Safeguarding 8%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 30%

Full report text

Inspection of Paignton Academy Waterleat Road, Paignton, Devon TQ3 3WA

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Good 5–6 July 2022

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders and staff promote a sense of belonging at Paignton Academy, with the view that ‘we may be two sites but we are one school’.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils feel safe at the school. They learn how to keep themselves physically and mentally healthy. Pupils know who to speak to should they have any concerns. If bullying occurs it is usually dealt with effectively. However, some pupils experience sexism from their peers.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils’ learning is strong in some areas of the curriculum. However, the curriculum is not always structured or taught well enough. So, pupils’ experiences are too variable. This is especially the case for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Sometimes learning is disrupted by pupils’ behaviour, which is not always dealt with consistently.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders are keen for pupils to have ‘genuinely memorable experiences’ and provide a range of extra-curricular activities. Pupils talk enthusiastically about the recent school musical and the new theatre, taking part in the Duke of Edinburgh award and the sporting opportunities at the school. Pupils on the academy council take their leadership responsibilities seriously. They enjoy working with staff to develop their school.

p.2

better?

The new headteacher has set a clear vision for school improvement. Leaders have begun to make improvements to key areas of the school. However, many important developments are in their infancy.

p.2

better?

The curriculum does not have the ambition and scope of the national curriculum. This means many pupils experience a narrower curriculum than they are entitled to follow. The number of pupils learning English Baccalaureate (EBacc) subjects is growing, however it is a minority of pupils.

p.2

better?

Curriculum leaders are enthusiastic and have sound subject knowledge. Leaders’ understanding of what makes a strong curriculum is, however, too variable. While there are some strong curriculums with well sequenced content, this is not always the case. This means that, in some subjects, pupils’ knowledge does not build securely on prior learning.

p.2

better?

Most subject curriculums at key stage 3 are closely aligned with examination curriculums. For example, pupils learn from an early stage how to answer GCSE-style questions. However, this does not have the impact leaders intend. While pupils can recall examination skills, they do not develop the requisite depth of subject knowledge. 5–6 July 2022

p.2

3

Assessment is used to check on what pupils know. It is most successful, although this is not routine, when used to question why pupils do not understand a particular topic. In the most effective cases, the curriculum and teaching are then adjusted.

p.3

3

The curriculum does not meet the needs of pupils with SEND. Staff do not always understand the needs of these pupils. As a result, pupils with SEND produce work below their capabilities. When pupils’ needs are not met, learning is disrupted by poor behaviour. At the off-site specialist centre, new leadership is developing a purposeful and nurturing environment for pupils.

p.3

3

Leaders understand the importance of reading and have built it into the curriculum. However, the reading programme is in its infancy, so insecure readers are yet to benefit from this.

p.3

3

Trustees are supportive of the school. They have helped the school to develop close links with local providers to support pupils’ next steps. However, those responsible for governance do not have a clear understanding of the school’s weaknesses. They have not acted with urgency to ensure that priority areas, such as the provision for pupils with SEND, are improved.

p.3

3

There is a comprehensive programme of personal development that pupils find helpful and relevant to their needs. Pupils receive objective careers advice to help them to make informed decisions about next steps. As a result, pupils feel well-informed to progress to further education, employment or training. The school meets the requirements of the Baker Clause, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeship.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders make sure that staff, including early career teachers, are confident to identify and report concerns. Staff receive training that keeps them up to date with safeguarding practice and local risks. Leaders ensure that necessary checks are made on newly appointed staff before they start work in school. Trustees regularly assure themselves of the effectiveness of the school’s safeguarding systems.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders know pupils and families well. Leaders work with external agencies to find the right support to help vulnerable pupils and families.

p.3

Safeguarding

Pupils learn how to keep themselves safe, including online. They are taught about healthy relationships. However, some pupils experience sexist language and attitudes as part of their daily life in school. 5–6 July 2022

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Pupils with SEND do not do as well as they could. This is because their needs are not clearly identified or understood. Teaching and the curriculum are not adapted effectively to meet their needs. Leaders are taking steps to improve the provision for pupils with SEND. It is important that these be enacted with urgency and impact to ensure that the curriculum meets the needs of all pupils with SEND.  Leaders’ understanding of what makes a strong curriculum is too variable. It is not always clear how content connects to prior learning or supports future learning. This means that pupils do not always learn well. Leaders have developed a well-structured professional development programme to support staff learning. They should ensure that this helps staff to better understand what makes a strong curriculum.  Some pupils experience sexist language and attitudes from their peers. This affects their experience of school. Leaders need to carefully consider how this can

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

be addressed effectively to ensure that a culture of respect is established.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 5–6 July 2022

p.4

School details

Inspection number 10227950 Type of school Secondary Comprehensive

p.5

School details

Number of pupils on the school roll 1437

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 29 September 2020, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The headteacher joined the school in September 2021.  The school is larger than the average-sized secondary school.  It has two main sites, at Waterleat Road and at Borough Road. Both sites educate pupils in key stages 3 and 4. The school also runs a specialist base for pupils with SEND.  The proportion of pupils who have SEND is above average.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. 5–6 July 2022

p.5

6

 Inspectors met with the principal, senior leaders and representatives of the trust. Inspectors visited the Waterleat Road and Borough Road sites. Inspectors also visited the school’s specialist provision.  The lead inspector met with the designated safeguarding lead, examined school records and discussed safeguarding cases.  Inspectors completed deep dives in the following subjects: English, drama, history, languages, mathematics and science. For each deep dive, the inspector met with subject leaders, looked at curriculum plans, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to pupils about their learning, and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors considered responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, including the free-text responses from parents. Inspectors also considered the responses to Ofsted’s pupil and staff surveys.

p.6

Inspection team

Tracey Reynolds, lead inspector Her Majesty's Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

David New Ofsted Inspector 5–6 July 2022

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion