Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Austin Farm Academy

Inspected 15 Jun 2022 · published 21 Sept 2022 · URN 141232

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Heather Barraclough

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    15 Jun 2022

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Heather Barraclough

  • Postcode verified

    PL6 5XQ

  • Name on report verified

    Austin Farm Academy

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+32Mostly positivemore positive than 67% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisepositivehigh expectationsclearhigh-qualitywell ledimprovingconsistentlyeffectively
Criticismnot strongconcernsconcernharmnot yetnot effectively

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1003w+32
  • Leadership8w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,011
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 53, typical 47
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
2
typical 8
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 90%Leadership 1%About the inspection 10%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Anthony Hutchings Interim Headteacher Austin Farm Academy Delamere Road Eggbuckland Plymouth Devon PL6 5XQ

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Austin Farm Academy

Following my visit to your school on 14 and 15 June 2022, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken since the school’s most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Austin Farm Academy

The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures following the inspection that took place in November 2021. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The monitoring inspection report is attached.

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Austin Farm Academy

This was the second routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. I discussed the ongoing impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in my evaluation.

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Austin Farm Academy

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

governance are taking effective action towards the removal of special

The school’s action plans are fit for purpose.

p.1

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that the school may

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer or equivalent of the Westcountry Schools Trust, a multi-academy trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Plymouth. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.2

Context

Since the previous inspection, the headteacher has left his post. The school is currently led by an interim headteacher who has been seconded from another school within the trust for four days per week. A new permanent headteacher has been appointed for September 2022. The interim headteacher will remain as executive headteacher in the first instance for one day per week from September 2022. One member of the teaching staff has left the school.

p.3

Context

The trust is in the process of reorganising its governance function. As a result, a director of education holds leaders accountable to the trust board while the full governance consultation takes place.

p.3

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Leaders have made a positive and determined start to improving the school. With the support of the trust, they have set a clear direction of travel. Everyone knows what is expected and where the key priorities lie. Leaders have carefully planned and prioritised development in reading, writing and mathematics. These will form the foundations for continued improvement in the long-term.

p.3

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

The interim headteacher has instilled confidence in staff and parents. One parent commented, ‘I have nothing negative to say about the school. I wished I had brought my children here sooner.’ There are high levels of engagement from staff in relation to leaders’ aims and ambitions. Staff are rising to the challenge. They appreciate the improvements made to communication and regular feedback as to what is working well. However, leaders are not complacent and know that there is still much to do to ensure pupils receive a high-quality education.

p.3

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Leaders have ensured that there is a consistently taught phonics programme in place. This area of the school’s work is now well led. Leaders assess and understand how well pupils are learning to read. Pupils now receive the right support to meet their needs. Appropriate training and coaching for staff are beginning to impact on the quality of phonics teaching. Staff expertise is improving. This is starting to enable staff to support pupils with their reading more effectively as well as staff being able to support each other in their delivery of the phonics programme.

p.3

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

The new writing curriculum is showing clear signs of development. Leaders have begun to check what is happening in classrooms. They ensure that staff follow agreed approaches to the teaching of writing. Leaders now challenge teachers where their practice is less strong. Teachers model and articulate relevant language through writing sessions well. Pupils’ attitudes to their learning in most classes are positive. However, this is less apparent at the top end of key stage 2. Staff subject knowledge is not as strong as it needs to be. This inhibits pupils’ learning. A new approach to the teaching of mathematics is currently being trialled in some classes. Early signs are positive. Pupil feedback shows there is greater challenge. However, it is too soon to see the full impact. Although staff have high expectations for their pupils, subjects in the wider curriculum are still developing. Staff expertise beyond English and

p.3

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Well-developed safeguarding processes and procedures ensure that pupils are safe. Concerns, however small, are reported through appropriate systems. Leaders act swiftly to protect pupils from harm. Staff understand their roles and responsibilities. Leaders have responded quickly to the areas of concern raised at the last inspection regarding site safety and the recruitment of staff. The trust carries out regular checks to mitigate any potential dangers. However, curriculum work on safety, in particular online safety, is not yet sufficiently developed.

p.4

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

The school has a high proportion of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Leaders understand their roles and responsibilities in relation to pupils with specific needs. They have been clearer in setting relevant and precise targets to support pupils’ learning. However, it is not currently evident how effectively teachers adapt learning for pupils with SEND.

p.4

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Curriculum thinking for personal development remains in its early stages. Although leaders have raised the profile of personal, social, health and economic education across the school, staff subject knowledge and leadership of this area remain underdeveloped. However, leaders have rightly identified that this is a priority in securing improvements across all wider curriculum subjects.

p.4

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Through relevant and well-targeted training, leaders are tackling the areas that need improvement. Staff benefit from shared expertise across the trust and external networks. Staff are provided with the time to disseminate new learning. They recognise the impact this is beginning to have on their practice. Staff feel listened to and engage positively in their own development.

p.4

Additional support

Clear support, direction and swift action from the trust are supporting leaders on their improvement journey. Detailed and regular scrutiny of the school’s work contributes significantly to the pace and effectiveness of change. Trust leaders provide high levels of challenge that enables school leaders to identify what needs to be adapted or actioned.

p.4

Additional support

The trust draws on external support to contribute to the school’s improvement journey where it feels it would be beneficial.

p.4

Evidence

The inspector observed the school’s work, scrutinised documents and met with the interim headteacher, and other leaders including the deputy designated lead for safeguarding, the English subject leader and the special educational needs coordinator. The inspector held discussions with representatives from the multi-academy trust, including the director of education responsible for governance. The inspector also met with a range of staff and pupils throughout the school day.

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion