Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Further education inspection (EIF)

JAG Training Limited

Inspected 14 Jul 2022 · published 7 Sept 2022 · URN 2494996

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Rebecca Jennings (lead), Jon Bowman

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    14 Jul 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    Jon Bowman, Rebecca Jennings

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Requires improvement

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Name on report verified

    JAG Training Limited

  • URN verified

    2494996

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentRequires improvement
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+3Mixedmore positive than 36% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisehigh-qualityeffectiveconsistentlyhigh qualityknowledgeablepositivefeel safeindependent
Criticismtoo manyweaknessestoo fewtoo oftenstruggleyet tonot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspectionSafeguarding positive critical
  • Findings753w−13
  • Safeguarding117w+11
  • What needs to improve134w+64

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
960
shorter than usual (typical 1228)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 40
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
5
typical 5
Hedged sentences
20%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 52%Safeguarding 8%What needs to improve 9%About the inspection 31%

Full report text

Further education and skills inspection report

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Requires improvement Apprenticeships Requires improvement Provision for learners with high needs Requires improvement Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.1

Information about this provider

JAG Training Limited (JAG) is a training provider based in south-east London. It began delivering apprenticeships in healthcare as a subcontractor in 2014, before gaining a direct contract in October 2017. JAG offers a variety of apprenticeship standards from level 2 to level 5.

p.1

Information about this provider

At the time of inspection, JAG was training 36 apprentices, with a further two on a break in learning. Most apprentices were studying level 3 business administrator or level 2 customer service practitioner standards. The remainder were studying level 3 senior healthcare support worker, level 3 teaching assistant, level 4 junior management consultant, level 4 project manager, level 5 operations or departmental manager, level 3 junior content producer, or level 3 digital solutions technician standards. Most apprentices work in doctors’ surgeries. 12 to 14 July 2022

p.1

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Apprentices complete most of their training through independent study. They benefit from the guidance of knowledgeable tutors with relevant vocational expertise. Most apprentices value the positive working relationships they have with their tutors. They appreciate that tutors understand the industry and help them manage the day- to-day demands of their roles.

p.2

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Too many apprentices struggle to access the learning resources they need. As a result, they do not make the progress of which they are capable.

p.2

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

In a few instances, apprentices’ work responsibilities encroach on their entitlement to training time. Leaders are aware of this and are taking steps to ensure all apprentices receive their entitlement.

p.2

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Most apprentices are motivated to achieve their goals, and many see the value of gaining a qualification, for example to work at a higher pay band. However, in a minority of cases where apprentices do not get enough support with their studies, they become demotivated about their learning.

p.2

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Most apprentices grow in confidence during their apprenticeship. For example, business administrator and customer service apprentices develop the skills to communicate with a wide range of people, including customers and stakeholders.

p.2

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Apprentices feel safe. They feel that if they needed any additional support, staff would provide it.

p.2

better?

Leaders and managers offer a wide range of apprenticeships that respond to the skills needs of the healthcare sector. However, leaders are yet to implement a clear curriculum strategy since changing their offer due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic. They have not developed the curriculum so as to ensure all apprentices receive a consistently high quality of training.

p.2

better?

Tutors teach topics in a logical order. For example, customer service apprentices first learn about their own organisation, and its aims, before learning about products and services. As a result, most apprentices gradually build their knowledge sufficiently well over time.

p.2

better?

Staff check what apprentices know and can do at the start of their training. However, they do not use this information to tailor apprentices’ programmes to meet their needs. As a result, too many apprentices repeat topics that they already know.

p.2

better?

Tutors focus too narrowly on supporting apprentices to create evidence to meet assessment criteria. They do not focus enough on teaching apprentices the breadth 12 to 14 July 2022

p.2

3

of knowledge and skills contained within their standard. Too few tutors plan training closely enough with employers, and, in the main, assessors’ feedback to apprentices on their written work does not help them make improvements. As a result, too often apprentices’ level of understanding is superficial.

p.3

3

Assessors have suitable teaching experience and expertise in their vocational area. They use their expertise to support apprentices to gain new knowledge, skills and behaviours, which they apply at work. For example, business apprentices learn about the project lifecycle and how to use analytical models, which they apply to projects at work.

p.3

3

Too many apprentices leave their training early and do not achieve their qualifications. Apprentices who remain in training receive suitable support in preparation for their end-point assessment. For example, tutors set apprentices mock tests and offer practice professional discussions. As a result, those who remain in training achieve highly, with most apprentices achieving merit or distinction grades where available.

p.3

3

Leaders have basic governance arrangements in place, but these are underdeveloped. Leaders get advice on how to improve some of the weaknesses in the provision. However, these arrangements do not provide sufficient scrutiny of the quality of education overall.

p.3

3

Leaders’ and managers’ quality assurance activities are not thorough enough. For example, they do not identify when apprentices’ written work is not original. Leaders take some appropriate actions to improve the quality of teaching and training. For example, they review information on learner progress and results, and closely monitor the performance of tutors, setting development targets where necessary.

p.3

3

Most apprentices are clear on their immediate next steps. Most apprentices who complete their training progress into employment and some, for example those studying health care at level 3, progress to university courses. However, staff do not provide all apprentices with consistently high-quality impartial information, advice and guidance. As a result, too many apprentices are not aware of the range of careers available to them once they complete their studies.

p.3

3

Leaders and managers do not plan a coherent programme of personal development topics for apprentices. Individual tutors provide some information and direct apprentices to additional training if apprentices ask them. As a result, too many apprentices are not aware of any opportunities for learning or personal development outside of their apprenticeship training.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders have put in place appropriate policies, including a ‘Prevent’ duty risk assessment, to safeguard apprentices. Policies state reporting procedures clearly 12 to 14 July 2022

p.3

4

and refer to relevant risks to learners, such as coercive control and peer-on-peer abuse. Leaders follow safe recruitment practices to ensure staff are suitable to work with young learners.

p.4

4

Apprentices have gained some understanding of the risks of radicalisation and extremism through training they have received at work. Staff provide basic online training for apprentices about ‘Prevent’ duty. However, tutors to not routinely revisit safeguarding topics. As a result, too many apprentices do not have a clear understanding of the dangers of radicalisation and extremism.

p.4

What does the provider need to do to improve?

 Leaders should work more closely with employers to plan apprentices’ training, and to ensure apprentices receive their entitlement to training time.  Leaders should ensure tutors use effective strategies to help apprentices remember more of what they are taught.  Leaders should ensure all tutors provide high-quality training and assessment across all curriculum areas.  Leaders should develop a coherent offer of personal development for all apprentices.  Leaders should ensure they have sufficient governance arrangements in place to provide effective challenge and scrutiny of the quality of education. 12 to 14 July 2022

p.4

Provider details

Address 12a Newmarket Green London SE9 5ER

p.5

Provider details

Provider type Independent learning provider

p.5

Provider details

Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.5

Provider details

Main subcontractors None 12 to 14 July 2022

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspection team was assisted by the owner, as nominee. Inspectors took account of the provider’s most recent self-assessment report and development plans, and the previous inspection report. The inspection was carried out using the further education and skills inspection handbook and took into account all relevant provision at the provider. Inspectors collected a wide range of evidence to inform judgements, including visiting learning sessions, scrutinising learners’ work, seeking the views of learners, staff and other stakeholders, and examining the provider’s documentation and records.

p.6

Inspection team

Rebecca Jennings, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector Jon Bowman Her Majesty’s Inspector 12 to 14 July 2022

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion