Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Further education inspection (EIF)

Royal Mencap Society

Inspected 10 Jun 2022 · published 30 Aug 2022 · URN 144786

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    10 Jun 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    Bernie White, Clifford Shaw, Jane Hughes, Joanna Walters, Mike Finn, Susan Gay

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Requires improvement

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Name on report verified

    Royal Mencap Society

  • URN verified

    144786

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentRequires improvement
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−29Mixedmore positive than 6% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivepositiveenjoyconsistentlyambitiousnurturingclearconfidently
Criticismtoo fewweaknessestoo oftennot consistentlytoo manynot effectivenot sufficientlynot always

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspectionSafeguarding positive critical
  • Findings1039w−43
  • Safeguarding108w+24
  • What needs to improve203w+39

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,303
about usual (typical 1228)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 40
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
5
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 56%Safeguarding 6%What needs to improve 11%About the inspection 27%

Full report text

Further education and skills inspection report

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Requires improvement Adult learning programmes Requires improvement Apprenticeships Inadequate Provision for learners with high needs Requires improvement Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement

p.1

Information about this provider

Royal Mencap Society is a charity that works with people with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Royal Mencap teaches traineeships, apprenticeships, supported internships and pre-supported internship programmes at a number of different centres throughout England. Royal Mencap has headquarters in Islington, London.

p.1

Information about this provider

At the time of the inspection, Royal Mencap had 124 learners who have education, health and care plans (EHC plan) and high needs studying a supported internship programme. There were 35 adult learners with SEND studying a short traineeship programme funded through the adult education budget. There were six apprentices with SEND studying the standards-based level 2 customer service practitioner apprenticeship.

p.1

Information about this provider

This academic year, Royal Mencap have introduced a one-year, pre-supported internship programme. The aim of the programme is to prepare young people for a supported internship. There are currently 40 learners on this programme, all of whom have an EHC plan and high needs. 8 to 10 June 2022

p.1

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Learners learn in calm, nurturing and inclusive environments. Tutors structure and pace lessons well. They do this by providing clear instructions for learners. At their work experience placements, learners on traineeships work industriously in warehouse and office settings and demonstrate professional standards of behaviour.

p.2

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

All apprentices are on customer services apprenticeships. For too many apprentices, the curriculum does not relate adequately to their aspirations and the jobs they have, for example as a kitchen porter or human resources administrator. As a result, it is not clear how apprentices will achieve and benefit from the qualification.

p.2

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Learners and apprentices have positive attitudes toward their learning. They develop increased levels of confidence during their programmes of study. For example, learners who work in train stations are able to handle customers’ queries confidently. Apprentices enjoy working with colleagues. The training helps them make new friends. Learners on supported internship and traineeship programmes particularly enjoy the practical work with employers.

p.2

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

During their programme, learners and apprentices receive appropriate levels of learning support. This support is reduced appropriately over time as learners and apprentices develop their confidence and skills. Consequently, the majority become more independent and can work and travel with less support.

p.2

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Learners and apprentices do not receive impartial careers advice early enough during their programme to enable them to plan for their futures. Where it is in place, this is delivered towards the end of the training. Consequently, learners and apprentices do not receive effective support to progress into employment.

p.2

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Most pre-internship learners have been offered a supported internship programme in the next academic year. However, too few learners on the supported internship and traineeship programmes achieve their primary goals of progression to work. Too few learners achieve their English and mathematics qualifications.

p.2

better?

Senior leaders and managers have a clear rationale for the programmes they offer. They aim to support learners and apprentices with SEND to move into employment. However, they do not ensure that the training meets their aims well enough. Too many learners on supported internship and traineeship programmes do not succeed in gaining sustained employment. Senior leaders do not ensure that apprentices are in the right job roles that help them develop the skills they need to achieve their apprenticeship.

p.2

better?

Senior leaders and governors have not rectified quickly enough some of the weaknesses identified at the previous inspection in June 2019. For example, they do not ensure that learners and apprentices benefit from a consistently good quality of 8 to 10 June 2022

p.2

3

education, and too few learners do not achieve their English and mathematics qualifications.

p.3

3

Senior leaders and governors do not provide effective scrutiny of the quality of education that learners and apprentices receive. Senior leaders and governors do not use information about the quality of provision well enough to identify key weaknesses and make the necessary improvements. Governors do not provide sufficient challenge to senior leaders to make improvements. As a result, learners, apprentices and staff at the different centres experience too much variability in the quality and effectiveness of the support they receive.

p.3

3

Tutors sequence the supported internship and traineeship programmes in a logical order. For example, on the supported internship programme, tutors start by teaching learners about key workplace expectations, such as professional boundaries, timekeeping and appropriate dress. They then move on to teach more placement- specific content, such as providing effective customer service.

p.3

3

Tutors do not identify effectively what learners and apprentices know and can do at the start of programmes. Too often, tutors complete informal assessments and do not plan to meet learners’ and apprentices’ individual needs. This contributes to learners and apprentices not making good progress.

p.3

3

Tutors prepare learners well for the workplace environment. Tutors ensure there are a number of opportunities for learners to meet employers at the beginning of their programmes. They provide informative disability awareness training to employers. Employers understand the support needs of learners who have SEND, such as the need to use different communication strategies or language that learners can easily understand.

p.3

3

Tutors and employers ensure most learners develop their skills and knowledge so they can take on more responsible and challenging work with employers. For example, learners on the supported internship move from helping customers find the platform at a station, to providing more complex travel advice at the travel desk. However, in a small number of instances, learners are at placements that do not sufficiently reflect their interests or aspirations.

p.3

3

Tutors do not consistently use resources that are appropriate for the age of the learners, who subsequently produce work that is not always at an appropriate level. For example, tutors use resources that have been produced for primary school-age children.

p.3

3

Tutors do not consistently provide helpful feedback on learners’ and apprentices’ work. Too often, tutors do not mark work or do not give feedback. As a result, it is unclear if learners complete their work correctly, and learners do not know what they have to do to improve.

p.3

3

Tutors, support staff and job coaches enable most learners to develop new skills, knowledge and behaviours for employability and work. For example, learners 8 to 10 June 2022

p.3

4

improve their communication skills, enabling them to improve their interaction with customers and learn how to work as part of a team. These skills prepare learners well for adulthood.

p.4

4

Staff support learners effectively with their emotional well-being. Tutors use learner reviews to reflect on the challenges learners have faced in learning, life and at work placements. Staff then identify internal support or inform learners of relevant community services. Staff explore strategies for ongoing support that learners can continue into their adult life. This prepares learners well for when they complete their studies.

p.4

4

Senior leaders do not ensure the curriculum prepares learners and apprentices for life in modern Britain. Tutors determine the topics they teach, and this differs between centres. As a result, there are inconsistencies in the topics taught to learners and apprentices such as sexual harassment, radicalisation and extremism and British values.

p.4

4

Tutors provide an enrichment offer at each of the centres for learners. These activities include Royal Mencap Society Olympics, visits from guest speakers and visits to leisure centres. However, too few learners access these activities or are aware of them.

p.4

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.4

Safeguarding

Senior leaders and the board of governors understand well their safeguarding and legal responsibilities. They have put in place suitable reporting processes for safeguarding. Appropriately trained designated safeguarding leads manage referrals well. They have appropriate reporting processes in place and have sufficient oversight of the referrals made. Learners benefit from support from the welfare officer.

p.4

Safeguarding

The majority of learners and apprentices feel safe and know who to contact if they have any concerns. They have a reasonable understanding of how to keep themselves safe. However, learners and apprentices do not have secure enough knowledge of the dangers associated with radicalisation and extremism.

p.4

What does the provider need to do to improve?

 Governors must ensure that they provide effective scrutiny of senior leaders’ progress in making the improvements needed so that the quality of education that learners and apprentices receive is consistently good.  Senior leaders must ensure the apprenticeship programme meets the requirements of an apprenticeship programme and that apprentices are on programmes that match their job roles.  Senior leaders must ensure that learners and apprentices receive careers advice 8 to 10 June 2022

p.4

5

and guidance earlier enough in their programme so they can be supported to make informed decisions about their next steps.  Leaders must improve the outcomes for learners on the supported internship and traineeship programmes so that the majority of learners secure positive outcomes and achieve their English and mathematics qualifications.  Tutors must identify learners’ and apprentices’ knowledge, skills and behaviours at the start of a programme so they can develop an ambitious and individual programme for learners and apprentices. 8 to 10 June 2022

p.5

Provider details

Address 123 Golden Lane Islington London EC1Y 0RT

p.6

Website

www.mencap.org.uk/advice-and- support/employment-services

p.6

Website

Provider type Independent specialist college

p.6

Website

Date of previous inspection 25 to 28 June 2019 8 to 10 June 2022

p.6

Information about this inspection

The inspection team was assisted by the head of lifestyles and work, as nominee. Inspectors took account of the provider’s most recent self-assessment report and development plans, and the previous inspection report. The inspection was carried out using the further education and skills inspection handbook and took into account all relevant provision at the provider. Inspectors collected a wide range of evidence to inform judgements, including visiting learning sessions, scrutinising learners’ work, seeking the views of learners, staff and other stakeholders, and examining the provider’s documentation and records.

p.7

Inspection team

Joanna Walters, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector Susan Gay Ofsted Inspector Bernie White Ofsted Inspector Mike Finn Her Majesty’s Inspector Jane Hughes Her Majesty’s Inspector Clifford Shaw Ofsted Inspector 8 to 10 June 2022

p.7

8

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

8

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

8

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

8

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

8

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion