Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
The Abbey School
Summary
Louise Walker (lead), Dave Euridge, Mark Roessler, Neil Strowger, Sue Bzikot, Yvonne Garvey
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
12 May 2022
- Inspectors verified
Dave Euridge, Louise Walker, Mark Roessler, Neil Strowger, Sue Bzikot, Yvonne Garvey
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Requires improvement
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
ME13 8RZ
- Name on report verified
The Abbey School
- URN verified
137154
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentRequires improvement
- Quality of educationGood
3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Too often, records are incomplete and do not contain the necessary detail about the nature of the concern. p.4
- This means that leaders do not have a precise oversight of which pupils are vulnerable and at risk of harm. p.3
- This includes ensuring that all pupils know why bullying and the use of derogatory language are unacceptable. p.3
- At social times, the poor behaviour of some pupils makes others feel vulnerable. p.2
- The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- not clear enough about their statutory responsibilities and the steps they should take to keep pupils safe from harm. p.4
- However, staff are unclear about the procedures to follow should they be concerned about the behaviour of an adult. 11 and 12 May 2022 p.3
- As a result, leaders do not always refer concerns to external agencies when they should. p.3
- However , some pupils do not attend school as often as they should. p.2
- Leaders must review all safeguarding roles, responsibilities and record-keeping procedures to ensure that they are secure and compliant. p.4
- Leaders should immediately strengthen safeguarding arrangements by ensuring that leaders responsible for safeguarding complete all statutory training. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,341
- about usual (typical 1552)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 53
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 6
- Hedged sentences
- 13%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of The Abbey School London Road, Faversham, Kent ME13 8RZ
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Inadequate Sixth-form provision Good Previous inspection grade Good 11 and 12 May 2022
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Leaders are determined that all pupils, including those with special education needs and/or disabilities (SEND), experience a broad and interesting curriculum. Pupils benefit from the range of experiences they have and the range of subjects they study. As pupils’ knowledge grows, so does their vocabulary, allowing them to think about, discuss and debate stimulating and important topics. Pupils with SEND, including those accessing the resource provision, are well supported and fully included in school life.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
However , some pupils do not attend school as often as they should. This has a negative impact on their learning . Many pupils are unhappy and do not feel safe. They are not confident that staff deal with bullying effectively. This leads to pupils not reporting incidents because they have little faith that issues will get resolved. At social times, the poor behaviour of some pupils makes others feel vulnerable.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils enjoy the wide range of opportunities to develop their interests and talents. These include clubs such as sports, drama and activities to look after the environment. Pupils are provided with regular, unbiased careers advice and guidance, including in the sixth form. This means they are well informed about different career pathways and future study options.
p.2
better?
Leaders and staff have high aspirations for what all pupils can achieve across the curriculum, including those in the sixth form. They have identified gaps in learning that have arisen from the COVID-19 pandemic and are acting quickly to address these. The curriculum is closely aligned to pupils’ individual needs, revisiting content that pupils missed during the pandemic and building on what they have understood. The needs of pupils with SEND are identified appropriately. Leaders work efficiently with staff to make sure that they have the training and knowledge to support these pupils effectively. Students in the sixth form enjoy the increased individual attention they receive from teachers, which helps them to learn well.
p.2
better?
The important knowledge pupils should learn and the order in which they should learn it is clearly set out across subjects. This means that pupils benefit from building their knowledge in a logical order. Often, pupils recall this knowledge easily and apply this in different contexts. However, in a small number of subjects, pupils do not get the opportunity to revisit and recall their learning, meaning that the most important content is sometimes forgotten. Leaders are addressing this.
p.2
better?
The number of pupils studying modern foreign languages (MFL) at key stage 4 is relatively low compared with the higher proportion of pupils who study geography and history at GCSE. Leaders are rightly taking steps to increase the proportion of pupils opting for languages so that more pupils study all of the English Baccalaureate subjects. As a result, more pupils are now choosing to study MFL. 11 and 12 May 2022
p.2
3
In lessons, most pupils comply with leaders’ strict expectations of behaviour. However, the way that leaders implement these expectations does not contribute positively to the culture of the school. For the majority of pupils, these approaches are applied in a manner that is overly restrictive. Many pupils find this oppressive. Leaders have not taken the right actions to address bullying or make sure that behaviour out of lessons is consistently good. Additionally, leaders have not instilled trust in pupils, which means pupils feel that they cannot report their concerns and know that these issues will be addressed effectively.
p.3
3
Trustees do not hold leaders fully to account for the impact of leaders’ actions. Trustees do not provide sufficient challenge and accept too much of what leaders tell them without question. For example, trustees do not robustly challenge leaders about the school’s safeguarding procedures or pupils’ welfare, including the low rates of attendance. This means trustees have not challenged leaders effectively about issues around pupils’ safety and bullying.
p.3
3
Some pupils’ attendance is not high enough, including in the sixth form. This is having a significantly negative effect on the achievement of pupils who do not attend regularly enough. While the new strategies that leaders have introduced have led to some improvements in some individual pupils’ attendance, they have not had the necessary impact yet overall.
p.3
3
Pupils have a strong understanding of how to keep themselves mentally and physically healthy. However, some pupils told inspectors that the personal, social and health education curriculum does not help everyone understand the importance of treating others with respect and consideration. This includes ensuring that all pupils know why bullying and the use of derogatory language are unacceptable.
p.3
3
Staff, including early career teachers, feel motivated and valued. They appreciate the guidance and support they receive from leaders to help manage their workload and well-being.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Systems for recording safeguarding concerns about pupils, including leaders’ actions in response, are extremely poor. Often, actions are not recorded in detail. Records of safeguarding concerns are not kept confidential or stored securely. They are also maintained in different places. This means that leaders do not have a precise oversight of which pupils are vulnerable and at risk of harm. As a result, leaders do not always refer concerns to external agencies when they should. Consequently, pupils do not get the help they need.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders take appropriate action to ensure the suitability of adults working with children. However, staff are unclear about the procedures to follow should they be concerned about the behaviour of an adult. 11 and 12 May 2022
p.3
4
Trustees do not have a rigorous oversight of the school’s safeguarding arrangements. They have not challenged leaders sufficiently to ensure that staff and leaders meet their safeguarding duties. This includes ensuring that all staff, including those responsible for safeguarding, have completed the required training.
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Most pupils have little confidence in leaders’ ability to tackle incidents of bullying successfully. This means that pupils do not feel safe. When incidents of bullying are reported, leaders need to take robust action to ensure that any incidents are resolved swiftly and effectively. The quality of written safeguarding records is poor. Too often, records are incomplete and do not contain the necessary detail about the nature of the concern. Additionally, any actions that have been taken are not recorded in sufficient detail and information is not shared with external agencies in a timely manner. This means that pupils are potentially at risk and do not get the help and support they need. Leaders must review all safeguarding roles, responsibilities and record-keeping procedures to ensure that they are secure and compliant. The designated safeguarding leaders are not well trained. As a result, they are
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
not clear enough about their statutory responsibilities and the steps they should take to keep pupils safe from harm. Leaders should immediately strengthen safeguarding arrangements by ensuring that leaders responsible for safeguarding complete all statutory training. Trustees do not robustly challenge leaders about the safeguarding procedures. Trustees need to ensure that they challenge leaders more robustly and carefully to ensure that they meet their statutory duties. Some pupils’ attendance is not high enough. This means that some pupils regularly miss out on essential learning. Leaders should continue with the strategies they have begun to introduce and ensure that these are implemented consistently to improve attendance, including students in the sixth form.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted . 11 and 12 May 2022
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.5
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 11 and 12 May 2022
p.5
School details
Inspection number 10226982 Type of school Secondary
p.6
provision
Number of pupils on the school roll 1202
p.6
sixth form
Date of previous inspection 21 February 2017, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.6
Information about this school
The school has a higher-than-average number of pupils with SEND. This includes 44 pupils who attend the specially resourced provision for pupils with autism spectrum disorder. The school is currently using three alternative providers. The school meets the requirements of the Baker Clause, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information about approved technical educational qualifications and apprenticeships. 11 and 12 May 2022
p.6
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.7
Information about this inspection
In accordance with section 44(2) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement, because it is performing significantly less well than it might in all the circumstances reasonably be expected to perform.
p.7
Information about this inspection
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors met with senior leaders, staff and pupils. The lead inspector met with four trustees, including the chair of trustees. She also met with a representative from Kent local authority. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, mathematics, science, drama, geography and modern foreign languages. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked samples of pupils’ work. To inspect safeguarding, inspectors viewed the school’s website and policies, checked the single central record of recruitment checks, met with designated safeguarding leaders, spoke to a range of staff and pupils, and spoke with
p.7
Information about this inspection
trustees. Inspectors took account of the responses to Ofsted’s Parent View 265 additional free-text responses. They also took account of the responses to the confidential staff and pupil surveys, as well as gathering additional views throughout the inspection.
p.7
Inspection team
Louise Walker, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
Mark Roessler Ofsted Inspector 11 and 12 May 2022
p.7
8
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
8
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
8
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
8
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
8
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion