Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Oakley House Kent in Kent
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Oakley House (Kent) Limited
- Inspection date verified
12 Jul 2022
- Inspectors verified
Sara Stoker
- Helped and protected verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement to be good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Name on report verified
2625170
- URN verified
2625170
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2022.
- OverallGood
- Helped and protectedGood
- Leadership and managementRI to be good
70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Overall judgement at last inspection: inadequate p.1
- A full inspection of the home was carried out on 4 and 5 April 2022 and resulted in an inadequate judgement. p.3
- One child who is currently at risk of radicalisation has a comprehensive risk assessment in place and a referral has been made to an external agency. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- No measure of control or discipline which is excessive, unreasonable or contrary to paragraph (2) may be used in relation to any child. p.5
- The registered manager must undertake such continuing professional development as is necessary to ensure that the registered manager has the skills needed for managing the home. p.5
- The registered person must notify HMCI and each other relevant person without delay if— p.5
- The registered provider should have clear arrangements in place for the management and oversight of allegations, including allegations against other young people. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance13
“The effectiveness of leaders and managers requires improvement to be good” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,118
- about usual (typical 1319)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 52, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report for children’s home: 2625170 1 Registered provider: Oakley House (Kent) Limited Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this children’s home
This privately owned home is registered to provide care for up to four children who may have social, emotional and behavioural difficulties.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The home has a registered manager who is suitably qualified.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
good
How well children and young people are helped and protected good
p.1
good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers requires improvement to be good
p.1
good
The children’s home provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.
p.1
good
Overall judgement at last inspection: inadequate
p.1
Enforcement action since last inspection:
A compliance notice was issued under regulation 32, fitness of workers. Inspection report for children’s home: 2625170 2
p.1
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement
05/04/2022 Full Inadequate 19/10/2021 Full Good Inspection report for children’s home: 2625170 3
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
A full inspection of the home was carried out on 4 and 5 April 2022 and resulted in an inadequate judgement. This inspection has focused on the changes that have been made by the provider since then and to assess whether the provider has met the compliance notice that was issued following the last inspection.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
The home has gone through an unsettled period which has resulted in two children moving out and two children remaining in the home.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children are provided with a nice environment. Their artwork is proudly displayed around the house and their views are considered when any changes are made to the home’s decor. For example, one child had asked for a den. Staff are currently planning for this to be installed. This demonstrates that children’s wishes and feelings truly matter and that each child can influence decisions.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
The registered manager ensures that children have comprehensive care plans in place. Children benefit from regular key-working sessions that cover a range of topics. For example, one child has received a bespoke session on stranger danger and peer pressure. This support has helped the child to stay safe.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Staff are proactive in supporting children’s health needs while respecting their wishes. For example, one child does not wish to engage in health treatments due to her values. However, recently staff became concerned about the child’s health and supported her to see a health professional and to receive the appropriate treatment. This demonstrates that staff have the skills to help children to stay healthy.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children make good educational progress. One child has successfully completed college. Another child has done so well at school she chose to visit a theme park as a reward.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
The registered manager has ensured that safeguarding is better embedded in the staff’s learning since the last inspection. This has led to staff growing in confidence and establishing routines and boundaries for children. Staff can demonstrate knowledge of children’s risks and the plans to mitigate these risks. Consequently, there has been a reduction in incidents.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
One child who is currently at risk of radicalisation has a comprehensive risk assessment in place and a referral has been made to an external agency. This wraparound care is helping to keep the child safe.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
There has been one incident of a child going missing from home. The registered manager took the lead and implemented the child’s risk management plan and Inspection report for children’s home: 2625170 4 liaised with the child’s professionals’ network to implement an agreed protocol for any further incidents. As a result, the child has not gone missing again.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
There has been a reduction in children’s emotional and self-harming behaviours. There is good communication with the dedicated mental health support team and risk management plans are kept updated and shared with staff to ensure that protective factors remain effective.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
The registered provider has made the appropriate changes to ensure that staff are suitably vetted. Consequently, the provider has met the compliance notice.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Sanctions used with children are rare. However, when these are used they are not always restorative in nature. For example, a child who used inflammatory language to staff had her mobile phone taken off her for a day. This does not provide children with learning to help them understand about appropriate behaviour.
p.4
good
The registered manager is dedicated to the care of children. However, there remain some gaps in her continued professional development.
p.4
good
There is a shortfall in one child’s care plan, regarding managing allegations. While this has not had an impact on the child’s care, this omission demonstrates a lack of awareness regarding safeguarding procedures.
p.4
good
Leaders and managers have not ensured that safeguarding concerns are notified to Ofsted and the local authority designated officer promptly. This demonstrates a lack of knowledge of the registered provider’s responsibilities to meet the requirements set out in regulation.
p.4
good
The registered manager has reflected on the last full inspection and the impact this period had on the children and the staff. This has resulted in a lessons learned review being carried out. This has led to improvements in staff’s skills and provided a more settled period in the home that has enabled the two remaining children to thrive physically, mentally and socially.
p.4
good
Staff receive regular supervision and training opportunities. Supervision practice has been developed by the registered manager and is now more in-depth. Staff have a thorough induction and this is reviewed in their probation assessment. All staff have a personalised development plan with set targets to enhance their skills and practice.
p.4
good
The systems used for the management oversight of the home have improved. The registered manager completes audits of children’s records and delegated staff tasks. Incident records are used to create scenarios in team meetings when staff reflect on each other’s practice and learn from this. Staff feel this is helping them develop their practice. Inspection report for children’s home: 2625170 5
p.4
Statutory requirements
This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.
p.5
Requirement Due date
No measure of control or discipline which is excessive, unreasonable or contrary to paragraph (2) may be used in relation to any child. (Regulation 19 (1)) 30 September
p.5
Requirement Due date
The registered manager must undertake such continuing professional development as is necessary to ensure that the registered manager has the skills needed for managing the home. (Regulation 29 (4)) 31 October 2022
p.5
Requirement Due date
The registered person must notify HMCI and each other relevant person without delay if—
p.5
Requirement Due date
an incident requiring police involvement occurs in relation to a child which the registered person considers to be serious;
p.5
Requirement Due date
there is an allegation of abuse against the home or a person working there;
p.5
Requirement Due date
there is any other incident relating to a child which the registered person considers to be serious. (Regulation 40 (4)(b)(c)(e)) 30 August 2022
p.5
Recommendation
The registered provider should have clear arrangements in place for the management and oversight of allegations, including allegations against other young people. (‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’, page 44, paragraph 9.18) Inspection report for children’s home: 2625170 6
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people, using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. Inspection report for children’s home: 2625170 7
p.6
Children’s home details
Registered provider: Oakley House (Kent) Limited
p.7
Children’s home details
Registered provider address: 3rd Floor, 86-90 Paul Street, London EC2A 4NE
p.7
Inspector
Sara Stoker, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for children’s home: 2625170 8 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
Inspector
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
Inspector
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
Inspector
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion