Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Hull City Council in Kingston upon Hull
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Hull City Council
- Inspection date verified
4 Jul 2022
- Inspectors verified
Rachel Ruth
- Helped and protected verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Name on report verified
2664883
- URN verified
2664883
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
- Helped and protectedGood
- Leadership and managementGood
70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes7
“Staff work quickly and effectively to achieve a safe and swift return.” p.4Leadership & governance2
“The effectiveness of leaders and managers good” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,154
- about usual (typical 1319)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 57, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report for children’s home: 2664883 1 Registered provider: Hull City Council Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this children’s home
This home is operated by a local authority. The home and manager were both registered with Ofsted in January 2022. The manager is suitably qualified and experienced. This is the first inspection of the home.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
Children stay at this home in a variety of circumstances; on an emergency basis at times of crisis, for planned breaks from their family home or longer term, while a new permanent home is arranged. This flexible provision means the type and duration of care is individualised dependant on what each child needs.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
This home accommodates one child only. It is part of a three-part wider service, which includes an outreach service for children and families in their own homes. This also includes another separately registered larger home where multiple children have respite away from their families.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
At the time of the inspection, there was no child was living there. The bed was reserved for a child who was missing from home to use when they were found.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
good
How well children and young people are helped and protected good
p.1
good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers good
p.1
good
The children’s home provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.
p.1
good
Date of last inspection: not previously inspected
p.1
good
Overall judgement at last inspection: not applicable
p.1
good
Enforcement action since last inspection: not applicable Inspection report for children’s home: 2664883 2
p.1
Recent inspection history
Not previously inspected Inspection report for children’s home: 2664883 3
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Due to the short-term nature of children’s stays, there is rarely time to personalise the premises. However, the care provided to each child is responsive and individualised to their needs and vulnerabilities. Each child arrives in the home in different circumstances, and this is considered when staff plan how best to support and promote the progress and safety of the children.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
For children who stay more than a single night, the staff know them well. This is evidenced by the ease with which they summarise and describe the plans for each child. Although children do not live in the home long enough for any progress to be wholly attributed to their care, their experience while there can be evaluated. Feedback from professionals and from children themselves is that this experience is a good one.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Staff foster effective relationships with other professionals and appropriately share information. This helps educational, social care and health workers to work collaboratively. They support family members to promote change and achieve better outcomes for both parents and children.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Staff build trusted relationships with children. This helps children to spend time with staff and sometimes share their worries and concerns. This shows the skill of the staff in achieving this, especially with their limited contact with the children.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
There is effective use of mental health practitioners to advise on how best to support children. This results in children only moving on within a timeframe that takes account of their anxieties. They are not rushed to move into their new home. There is also highly effective liaison between staff in this home and the new home to ensure that children have consistent support when they move on.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
For those children who stay long enough, there is an opportunity for them to provide formal feedback and express their opinions. These conversations are well recorded and include a response from the manager. Children’s requests are met when possible. This helps children to feel they are valued, and that their opinions count. For example, one child asked for a Sunday roast, but because his stays were on a Friday, it was decided to cook a Friday roast instead.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children spend their time with staff doing things they enjoy. Although staff regularly carry out focused work with children on known risks to help them be safer, they also recognise the need for children to have unstructured time. This helps children to feel relaxed, safe and secure. Inspection report for children’s home: 2664883 4
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Staff demonstrate a sound understanding of the risks to children. Records clearly reflect this and have relevant mitigating strategies for staff to implement. Where risks are linked to peer groups or community-based activity, there is evidence that this is managed within a wide multi-agency forum. This promotes children’s safety.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
There have been no incidents of children going missing from care when staying at the home. Staff have provided outreach support to schools and families to search for children who have gone missing under other circumstances and when not staying at the home. Staff work quickly and effectively to achieve a safe and swift return. Plans show evidence of regular reviews and updates to ensure they remain fit for purpose.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Where children have specific risks that need broader oversight or specialist intervention, the manager ensures this is provided. Where risks could impact on other children, including those placed at the sister home, this is considered and appropriate action is taken. This helps to ensure that unhealthy friendships are not established or maintained as a result of being in the home.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Processes relating to medication and recruitment are safely arranged, and records show evidence that they are followed. There have been no allegations about staff, no use of physical restraint and only two safeguarding incidents, neither of which relate to activity within the home. This shows that children’s risks and behaviours are effectively managed.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The home is newly registered but has benefited from the considerable experience of the manager and staff in the long-established sister home. The manager is clear about where this solo-bedded home fits into the wider service. Staff also share that understanding. This ensures children only move in when staff are confident they can meet their needs.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The home fulfils a specific purpose in promoting family resilience in difficult times. It gives children an opportunity to have a break from difficult dynamics within their family and offers a place of refuge in emergency situations. The managers are protective of this model, which ensures only children who will benefit from the service have access to it.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Children mostly stay for only a short time, but despite this, the manager is clear that meeting health and education needs should not be deferred until they move to a permanent place. Hence, she has advocated effectively for services to be put in place at the earliest point. This ensures there is no disruption to the progress of children.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Staff say they are well supported. They receive regular reflective supervision, and team meetings are held regularly. Both are well recorded. This ensures staff have the opportunity to discuss children and share knowledge. Training records show that Inspection report for children’s home: 2664883 5 staff have the skills and knowledge to meet children’s needs. When children have particular vulnerabilities beyond the recent experience of staff, clinical discussions and refresher training ensure staff feel confident and able to deliver good quality care.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Children are welcomed to the home in a sensitive and structured way. This ensures their stay is safe and enjoyable. Staff recognise the fears children may have about coming to the home, sometimes at very short notice, and offer reassurance and nurturing care. This helps children to benefit from the time away from stresses.
p.5
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Children’s views and wishes are central to their care, and the manager is focused on achieving positive outcomes for them. The team promote tolerance. This is embedded into the culture of the home, evidenced by the consistent messages given by the staff to children about appropriate beliefs and attitudes.
p.5
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Managers and staff are held in high regard. One professional said they could not do their job without the team. The manager challenges others effectively and has high expectations for children. This helps them to benefit from the care and move to their next home having had a positive experience. Inspection report for children’s home: 2664883 6
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people, using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. Inspection report for children’s home: 2664883 7
p.6
Children’s home details
Registered provider address: Kingston upon Hull City Council, The Guildhall, Alfred Gelder Street, Hull HU1 2AA
p.7
Children’s home details
Registered manager: Louise Taylor-Deville
p.7
Inspector
Rachel Ruth, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for children’s home: 2664883 8 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
Inspector
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
Inspector
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
Inspector
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion