Early years · Early years complaint outcome
Kido Golders Green Road
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
5 Aug 2022
- URN verified
EY536606
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 347
- about usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 41, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 12%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2 . If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 14 July 2022, we received concerns that the provider was not meeting some of these requirements.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 2 August 2022, we carried out a regulatory visit. We found the provider was not meeting some of the requirements. We have issued actions for the provider to take. The provider will be able to give parents further information about this.
p.1
Summary of outcome
• ensure all staff have a good knowledge and understanding of various child protection issues, including FGM and radicalisation so that they are able to identify when an allegation is made against staff and to follow the correct safeguarding policies and procedures
p.1
Summary of outcome
• improve the recruitment procedure to ensure it includes thorough vetting processes for all staff
p.1
Summary of outcome
• improve the key person system to ensure that staff are able to meet their key children's individual needs, particularly, when children are unsettled or require more attention
p.1
Summary of outcome
• ensure staff are aware of safe sleeping arrangements, in particular that they place infants down to sleep safely in line with latest government safety guidance We reviewed the provider's response and found that they had improved recruitment procedure and ensured all staff have a good knowledge and understanding of various child protection issues and follow correct procedure when needed. We also found that the provider had improved the key person system and staff's knowledge of safe sleeping arrangements. We are satisfied the provider has met the safeguarding and welfare action raised. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.2
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.
p.2
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion