Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Softools Limited

Inspected 15 Jun 2022 · published 8 Aug 2022 · URN 2654197

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Carolyn Brownsea

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    15 Jun 2022

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Carolyn Brownsea

  • Postcode verified

    RG9 3AU

  • Name on report verified

    Softools Limited

  • URN verified

    2654197

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−14Mixedmore positive than 17% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseindependent
Criticismlimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
20
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
—
Average sentence
7 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 2%About the inspection 98%

Full report text

Softools Limited Monitoring visit report

p.1

Name of lead inspector: Carolyn Brownsea, Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.1

Type of provider: Independent learning provider

p.1

Address:

Greenlands Hambleden Henley-on-Thames RG9 3AU Monitoring visit: Softools Limited, 14 and 15 June 2022

p.1

Context and focus of visit

From October 2018, Ofsted undertook to carry out monitoring visits to all newly directly funded providers of apprenticeship training provision which began to be funded from April 2017 or after by the Education and Skills Funding Agency and/or the apprenticeship levy. This monitoring visit was undertaken as part of those arrangements and as outlined in the ‘Further education and skills inspection handbook’, especially the sections entitled ‘Monitoring visits’ and ‘Monitoring visits to providers that are newly directly publicly funded’. The focus of these visits is on the themes set out below.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

Softools Limited is an independent learning provider based in Henley-on-Thames. It has held a contract to teach apprenticeships for levy-paying employers since 2019. At the time of the visit, there were 11 apprentices across two employers, all of whom were over the age of 19. Ten were following the operations or departmental manager standard at level 5 and one apprentice was following the team leader or supervisor standard at level 3.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Leaders have not ensured that apprentices develop substantial new skills and behaviours. They do not assess apprentices’ starting points, and consequently apprentices with existing management skills repeat learning that they have already done.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Governance arrangements are not effective. Leaders do not have oversight of the quality of education for apprentices. Leaders meet monthly and discuss reports on enrolments and withdrawals. However, they do not receive information that provides clarity on the progress of apprentices. They do not know the strengths and weaknesses of the curriculum and are not able to make the rapid improvements that are required.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Leaders have an established history of delivering leadership and management training to large employers. They are ambitious for their apprentices to progress in their careers with their employers. They plan well for workplace projects with employers, based on business-critical activities and functions.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Off-the-job training is provided through self-directed learning and one-to-one coaching. The training materials are well planned, so that the requirements of Monitoring visit: Softools Limited, 14 and 15 June 2022 qualifications are met. However, leaders do not plan for training to meet wider learning objectives and activities other than independent learning.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Leaders do not ensure that trainer assessors have the qualifications and training they need to provide a high standard of education. Trainer assessors and coaches hold relevant professional qualifications, and have significant industry experience. Too few hold a formal teaching or assessor qualification. As a result, not all trainer assessors ensure that apprentices have the skills they need to research, analyse and synthesise information. As a result, apprentices who need to develop their study skills do not progress as well as their peers.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Trainer assessors do not gather information about apprentices’ existing vocational skills or experience when planning programmes. Therefore, apprentices with previous leadership and management experience or qualifications complete the same programme as inexperienced apprentices. Consequently, these apprentices only refresh their existing knowledge and do not develop substantial new knowledge and skills.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Leaders do not ensure that employers are routinely involved in the review of their apprentices’ progress. Trainer assessors do not ensure that employers know the sequence of learning for apprentices. They do not capture the new skills and behaviours that apprentices gain at work to support apprentices to make further progress. As a result, employers are unable to help apprentices to apply and deepen their learning in the workplace.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Trainer assessors’ approach to assessment is too focused on the completion of unit workbooks. Apprentices who make good progress and complete their workbooks value the support and spoken feedback that their trainer assessors provide. Assessment is not used effectively to identify whether apprentices have gaps in their knowledge, skills and behaviours. Consequently, apprentices who make slower progress do not benefit from support, guidance or targets. As a result, these apprentices make slower progress.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Trainer assessors do not provide enough information or training on the requirements of apprentices’ end-point assessments early enough in their programmes. Consequently, most apprentices do not know what they need to do in their final assessments, nor what grades they could achieve. Trainer assessors do not support apprentices to develop the skills they need for these assessments.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Employers report that apprentices’ confidence has been boosted as a result of their training. They describe how apprentices demonstrate behaviours expected of a team Monitoring visit: Softools Limited, 14 and 15 June 2022 leader, such as using their own initiative to plan workloads and volunteering to take on new tasks and projects at work.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Leaders have not implemented the key procedures that are set out in the organisation’s safeguarding policy. Staff have not completed training on how to identify the risks from radicalisation and extremism, despite the policy stating that these are in place.

p.4

Insufficient progress

Leaders have recently updated the safeguarding policy to include up-to-date references to key documents such as ‘Keeping children safe in education 2021’.

p.4

Insufficient progress

Staff are not trained in safeguarding to the levels that the organisation’s policy prescribes. Managers who should have achieved level 2 and level 3 qualifications in safeguarding have not done so.

p.4

Insufficient progress

Leaders do not keep records on the safe recruitment of the staff they recruit to coach apprentices.

p.4

Insufficient progress

Apprentices report that they feel safe, and that they know where to go if they need help. However, the provider’s internal safeguarding processes are not sufficient to ensure that an apprentice seeking help would receive the support they might need. Monitoring visit: Softools Limited, 14 and 15 June 2022 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

Insufficient progress

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

Insufficient progress

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Insufficient progress

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

Insufficient progress

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion