Early years · Early years compliance action
Childminder in Kingston upon Thames
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
5 Aug 2022
- URN verified
EY405113
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 301
- about usual (typical 317)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 39, typical 35
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 17 June 2022, we carried out an inspection and found the provider was not meeting some of these requirements. The overall effectiveness of the provision was judged to be inadequate. The inspection report sets out the actions the provider was required to take to meet the requirements.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 7 July 2022, we carried out a regulatory visit. The focus of the visit was to check whether the provider had met the safeguarding and welfare actions, raised at their last inspection.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We found that the childminder had improved their knowledge and understanding of child protection procedures and now fully understands their responsibilities. The childminder has reviewed the use of mobile phones and cameras in the setting. She no longer allows her assistants to use their personal mobile phones while working with children. The childminder has started to focus on her professional development to help ensure children have access to a high-quality curriculum. She now provides individualised support and arranges training for her assistants to improve the quality of education for children. The childminder has improved sleeping arrangements for children. Children now sleep safely in age-appropriate cots. The childminder has reviewed her risk assessments and removed hazards within the environment. The childminder has started to focus on developing effective partnerships with parents to help provide continuity in children's learning and development. She has
p.1
Summary of outcome
developed her knowledge of when it is necessary to inform Ofsted of significant events.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We are satisfied that the childminder has met the safeguarding and welfare actions raised. The childminder is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion