Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

The Organisation for Professionals in Regulatory Affairs Limited

Inspected 16 Jun 2022 · published 4 Aug 2022 · URN 2643275

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Sue Hasty

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    16 Jun 2022

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Sue Hasty

  • Postcode verified

    E14 9GE

  • Name on report verified

    The Organisation for Professionals in Regulatory Affairs Limited

  • URN verified

    2643275

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−11Mixedmore positive than 19% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveambitioussuccessfullyconfidentlyeffectivelyconfidentfeel safeindependent
Criticismlimitedconcernsdo not knownot clearbelownot timely

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,209
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 33, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
5
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

The Organisation for Professionals in Regulatory Affairs Limited Monitoring visit report

p.1

Name of lead inspector: Sue Hasty, Her Majesty's Inspector

p.1

Type of provider: Independent learning provider

p.1

Address: 3, Harbour Exchange Square South Quay London E14 9GE Monitoring visit: The Organisation for Professionals in Regulatory Affairs Limited, 15 and 16 June 2022

p.1

Context and focus of visit

From October 2018, Ofsted undertook to carry out monitoring visits to all newly directly funded providers of apprenticeship training provision which began to be funded from April 2017 or after by the Education and Skills Funding Agency and/or the apprenticeship levy. This monitoring visit was undertaken as part of those arrangements and as outlined in the ‘Further education and skills inspection handbook’, especially the sections entitled ‘Monitoring visits’ and ‘Monitoring visits to providers that are newly directly publicly funded’. The focus of these visits is on the themes set out below.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

The Organisation for Professionals in Regulatory Affairs Limited (TOPRA) has held a contract to offer apprenticeships since July 2019. They run the level 7 regulatory affairs specialist standards-based apprenticeship. Currently, TOPRA is the only provider to offer this programme. TOPRA’s head office is in London. Apprentices work for employers that mainly operate within the life sciences sector across the country.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

At the time of the monitoring visit TOPRA taught 48 apprentices, all of whom are aged over 19.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders have established effective partnerships with employers, who were closely involved in the development of the apprenticeship standard. Consequently, leaders have a thorough understanding of employers’ needs. They have responded well to employers’ requests for training employees who are new to their roles as regulatory affairs specialists.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders have made thoughtful use of feedback from apprentices and employers to adapt the course. For example, they have included an optional module in advanced therapies for apprentices studying the medicines pathway. Leaders review frequently the content of the course. They ensure that teaching covers the most up-to-date regulatory legislation. Employers value the fresh ideas apprentices bring to their work.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders ensure that they meet the requirements of the apprenticeship. Assessors discuss with apprentices in detail the opportunities they have for off-the-job training. These include shadowing their mentor at work and joining online masterclasses. Monitoring visit: The Organisation for Professionals in Regulatory Affairs Limited, 15 and 16 June 2022 Where necessary, assessors meet with managers to agree changes to apprentices’ work schedules so that they can complete their coursework. As a result, most apprentices stay on the course and are on track with their studies.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders appoint volunteer teachers from the regulatory affairs sector who have a wide range of appropriate subject specialisms. They have in-depth experience of regulatory processes and current legislation. Apprentices greatly appreciate their teachers’ highly relevant and up-to-date knowledge of their subjects.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Most apprentices are ambitious to progress in their careers. However, leaders do not provide apprentices with timely information and advice about their next steps when they finish their programme. They do not know about the wider options open to them beyond those offered by their employer.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Leaders do not assess rigorously enough the quality of training. They do not systematically provide teachers with feedback on how to improve their teaching skills. In a very small minority of instances, apprentices find teachers’ presentations difficult to follow.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Leaders plan a logically sequenced curriculum for the regulatory affairs standard. They have carefully considered the foundation knowledge that apprentices need to learn before they can complete specialist modules. For example, apprentices first learn about the essential skills for the regulation of medical devices or pharmaceuticals. They then move on to study topics in greater depth such as the conduct of clinical trials. Apprentices benefit from the option of taking an additional masters-level degree course in regulatory affairs while on the apprenticeship.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Staff make effective use of the information they collect about apprentices’ academic and technical starting points. They adapt appropriately the course for apprentices with prior knowledge of regulatory affairs. However, staff do not assess sufficiently the behaviours apprentices need to gain to complete the course. As a result, there is not a clear plan in place that shows how apprentices will develop the necessary workplace behaviours they need to succeed in their roles.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Most teachers give clear explanations of complex information. They teach succinctly the clinical concepts, technical language and methodology apprentices need to apply successfully at work. Apprentices recall confidently their understanding of topics such as European and American regulatory affairs legislation. They apply effectively their newly gained skills at work. For instance, apprentices competently take the lead on projects to revise their employers’ regulatory documentation to ensure compliance with post-Brexit legislation. Monitoring visit: The Organisation for Professionals in Regulatory Affairs Limited, 15 and 16 June 2022 During progress reviews, assessors do not give apprentices enough time to reflect on what they have learned. They do not help apprentices identify in detail how they apply their new knowledge and skills at work. Consequently, assessors do not set apprentices clear targets for the skills and knowledge they need to develop.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Teachers and assessors prepare apprentices well for their final examinations. Apprentices close to the end of their programme feel confident in giving their presentation to the external examiner.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Leaders have suitable arrangements in place for safeguarding apprentices. They have developed appropriate policies and procedures for reporting, recording, and monitoring safeguarding concerns. These are currently untested.

p.4

Reasonable progress

The designated safeguarding leads have undertaken relevant training for their roles. Staff have received training in how to recognise and report safeguarding concerns. However, volunteer teachers have not received any safeguarding training. Leaders keep thorough records of safeguarding risks, including actions taken to lessen these risks.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Apprentices say they feel safe in training and at work. They know who to go to if they have any concerns.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Leaders have taken satisfactory steps to meet the requirements of the ‘Prevent’ duty. However, leaders have not identified the specific local and regional risks associated with extremism and radicalisation in the locations in which apprentices work. Apprentices have a limited understanding of how the dangers of extremism and radicalisation apply to their lives or work. Monitoring visit: The Organisation for Professionals in Regulatory Affairs Limited, 15 and 16 June 2022 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council

p.4

Reasonable progress

children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.5

Reasonable progress

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

Reasonable progress

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Reasonable progress

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

Reasonable progress

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion