Early years · Early years complaint outcome
Busy Bees Day Nursery at Huntingdon
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
1 Aug 2022
- URN verified
221622
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 316
- about usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 23 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage . If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 24 May 2022 we received concerns that this provider was not meeting some of these requirements.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We carried out regulatory telephone calls to the provider on 7 June and 1 July 2022 to discuss how the provider meets requirements. We were satisfied with the actions they had taken to improve how staff are deployed to supervise children, how accidents and/or injuries are recorded and information shared with parents. The provider had also tightened procedures in place to prevent children being given food or drink which is not suitable for their specific dietary requirements. However, we found that the provider had not suitably notified of an incident in relation to a child being served a drink which was not appropriate for them.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We issued a notice to improve to the provider to:
p.1
Summary of outcome
n ensure that those given responsibility for making notifications to Ofsted understand when a significant event is likely to affect the suitability of the early years provider or any person who cares for, or is in regular contact with, children on the premises to look after children.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We are satisfied with the action that the provider has taken to improve the knowledge of those responsible for making notifications to Ofsted about what constitutes a significant event.
p.1
Summary of outcome
The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years. For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.1
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion