Early years · Early years inspection (EIF)
Cherry Tree Bi-Lingual Day Nursery and Pre-School/School Club
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Pastor Albeiro Ocampo Montoya and Dalia Ros Partnership
- Group reference verified
RP903499
- Inspection date verified
6 Jun 2022
- Inspectors verified
Elke Rockey
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Postcode verified
HP3 9UH
- Name on report verified
Cherry Tree Bi-Lingual Day Nursery and Pre-School/School Club
- URN verified
EY405834
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentInadequate
- Quality of educationInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Weaknesses in the statutory requirements means children's needs are not met. p.2
- The provider failed to consider how the staff present would be best placed to support the children. p.2
- Some staff have a poor understanding of child development. p.2
- Performance management plans for staff are ineffective. p.2
- The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Records & policies4
“Staff ask parents about incoming injuries and record this accurately.” p.3Teaching & assessment3
“The quality of teaching is variable.” p.2Communication & language3
“However, staff repeat few words to support communication development.” p.2Parents & families3
“Staff ask parents about incoming injuries and record this accurately.” p.3Leadership & governance2
“Performance management plans for staff are ineffective.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 910
- about usual (typical 972)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 53, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Cherry Tree Bi-Lingual Day Nursery and Pre-School/School Club 15 Horselers, HEMEL HEMPSTEAD, Hertfordshire HP3 9UH
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
The provision is inadequate
Despite improvements being made to practice over the course of the registration, the provider is unable to sustain a good standard of provision. Weaknesses in the statutory requirements means children's needs are not met. Staff try their best to comfort distressed children. However, they do not know them well enough to offer reassurance and support. As a result, children and babies cry for prolonged periods. Furthermore, at lunchtime, babies wait a long time in their chairs for their lunch, with nothing to do.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Children do not make good progress in their learning. Younger children spend a lot of their day moving between the rooms and the garden. Staff's attention becomes continually focused on ensuring that they know where the children are during these transitions. This means that interactions to support their learning are minimal. For example, when staff begin to play an animal game with children, they interrupt the game to swap children to go into the garden. Therefore, children do not have time to learn and embed the new animal names. Overall, activities are not well prepared and do not capture the attention of the children. Some adult-led activities are not well supported by all staff. For instance, when playing 'What's the time Mr Wolf?' in the garden, some children ride bikes through the area, disturbing the game. Babies spend time exploring electronic resources. However, staff repeat few words to support communication development.
p.2
need to do better?
n The provider fails to deploy staff effectively to meet children's needs. They do not consider the necessary skills and experience of the staff required to support the children in their care. For example, for large parts of the day, poorly skilled staff work by themselves. Additionally, when staff are unsure of the routines, they focus on tasks and leave children to wander and become involved in more boisterous play. This results in some unsafe play. For example, children climb on chairs to look in the fish tank and wander outside eating bowls of raisins. n The key-person system is ineffective. On the day of inspection, several staff were absent and therefore, unable to support their allocated key children. The provider failed to consider how the staff present would be best placed to support the children. For example, even though parents complete forms so staff know about their children's individual needs, this information is not passed on to the
p.2
need to do better?
staff who need it. This means that staff do not know essential information to support children to settle and to adhere to their individual needs. n The quality of teaching is variable. Some staff have a poor understanding of child development. For example, when babies tussle over a toy, staff simply say the word 'share', which the babies do not understand. Furthermore, during busy group times, staff do not support children to listen and pay attention. This
p.2
need to do better?
6 June 2022 means children's learning is continually disrupted. n The deputy manager understands how children learn. However, staff do not implement the intended curriculum well. For example, younger and older children do not always have the opportunity to practise their independence skills. Staff do not provide children with the opportunities to wipe their own nose. n Performance management plans for staff are ineffective. After staff begin work, the provider does not monitor their knowledge and practice to establish a sufficient standard. The provider and deputy manager encourage staff to complete training. However, this fails to have a positive impact on practice. n Older children learn about some mathematical ideas. They learn to count accurately and measure liquids with jugs. More skilled members of staff encourage children to compare sizes of small, medium and large with corresponding items. n Parents are satisfied with the service provided. They say they receive enough
p.2
need to do better?
communication about their child's day. They appreciate the efficiency of the online journal that gives them information about their child's learning and time at nursery. n The deputy manager works hard to try to help children with special educational needs and/or disabilities receive the support from the services they need. Additional funding is spent on resources for children to help their learning.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
The safety of children is compromised. Staff have a weak understanding of what action to take if an allegation is made against, for example, another member of staff. Furthermore, some staff do not know the signs to be alert to when a child may be exposed to extremist behaviours. On the day of inspection, the provider used her personal mobile phone in the nursery. This contradicts the mobile phone policy. The designated safeguarding officer understands their role to refer concerns should staff raise them. Staff ask parents about incoming injuries and record this accurately.
p.3
Due date
6 June 2022 train all staff to understand the safeguarding policy including what to do if they are concerned about other members of staff and 'Prevent' duty 22/06/2022
p.3
Due date
ensure mobile phones are used in line with the nursery mobile phone policy 22/06/2022
p.4
Due date
ensure staffing arrangements and deployment of staff meet the needs of all children and assures their safety 22/06/2022
p.4
Due date
ensure information gathered about children on entry is used effectively to tailor care and learning to their individual needs 22/06/2022
p.4
Due date
ensure the performance management programme helps staff to improve the quality of their interactions with the children. 22/06/2022
p.4
Due date
plan and implement a challenging and enjoyable learning experience, including promoting babies and children's personal, social and emotional development and their communication skills. 26/08/2022
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number EY405834 Local authority Hertfordshire Inspection number 10244188 Type of provision Childcare on non-domestic premises
p.5
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Full day care
p.5
inspection
Total number of places 33 Number of children on roll 60
p.5
Name of registered person
Pastor Albeiro Ocampo Montoya and Dalia Ros Partnership
p.5
reference number
Telephone number 01442 247237 Date of previous inspection 30 April 2019
p.5
Information about this early years setting
Cherry Tree Bi-Lingual Day Nursery and Pre-School/School Club registered in 2010 and is located in Hemel Hempstead. The nursery employs 12 members of childcare staff. Of these, three hold appropriate early years qualifications at level 2 and six hold qualifications at level 3 or above. The nursery opens from Monday to Friday, all year round. Sessions are from 8am until 6pm. The nursery provides funded early education for two-, three- and four-year-old children.
p.5
Inspection activities
n This was the first routine inspection the nursery received since the COVID-19 pandemic. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the deputy manager and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the nursery. n This inspection was carried out as a result of a risk assessment, following information received about the provider. n The deputy manager joined the inspector on a learning walk and talked to the inspector about their curriculum and what they want the children to learn. n The inspector talked to staff at appropriate times during the inspection and took account of their views. n The inspector observed the quality of education being provided indoors and outdoors, and assessed the impact that this was having on children's learning. n The deputy manager and the inspector carried out a joint observation of a spontaneous activity. n The inspector spoke to several parents during the inspection and took account of
p.6
Inspection activities
their views. n The inspector looked at relevant documentation and reviewed evidence of the suitability of staff working in the nursery. n Children talked with the inspector during the inspection.
p.6
Inspection activities
We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.6
Inspection activities
6 June 2022 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
Inspection activities
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspection activities
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.7
Inspection activities
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspection activities
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion