Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Shire Oak Academy
Summary
Martin Spoor (lead), Darren Bishop, Graeme Rudland, Steve Byatt, Tim Bassett
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
28 Apr 2022
- Inspectors verified
Darren Bishop, Graeme Rudland, Martin Spoor, Steve Byatt, Tim Bassett
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
WS9 9PA
- Name on report verified
Shire Oak Academy
- URN verified
136620
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Sometimes, their behaviour is exceptional. p.2
- Pupils generally behave well, and often very well, in class. p.2
- Pupils are happy to come to school and feel safe. p.2
- Senior leaders have high expectations for pupils and staff. p.2
- Teachers are ambitious for these pupils and understand precisely how to meet their individual needs. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- As a result, some pupils are not prepared as well as they should be for their work in Years 10 and 11 and too few pupils follow the English Baccalaureate in key stage 4. p.2
- Senior leaders and subject leaders have a good understanding of how the school needs to improve. p.2
- Leaders should ensure that all staff recognise their responsibility to uphold the school’s behaviour policy in this respect, and make sure that they do so. p.4
- Leaders should make sure that the endpoints for every subject at key stage 3 provide pupils with the best possible basis for their future studies. p.4
- Leaders should continue to develop this support to ensure that pupils develop fluency, confidence p.4
- In a few subjects, pupils’ early studies do not prepare them for key stage 4 as well as they should. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance20
“Senior leaders have high expectations for pupils and staff.” p.2SEND & inclusion4
“Pupils in the resourced provision for pupils with SEND thrive.” p.2Staff development4
“They have established a strong culture of staff training.” p.3Communication & language4
“A minority of pupils use bad language, lack courtesy and drop litter.” p.2Reading & phonics3
“A high proportion of pupils start Year 7 with low reading ages.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,111
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 59, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Shire Oak Academy Lichfield Road, Walsall Wood, Walsall, West Midlands WS9 9PA
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Sixth-form provision Good Previous inspection grade Requires improvement 27 and 28 April 2022
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils generally behave well, and often very well, in class. However, at social times, staff sometimes fail to address some pupils’ inappropriate behaviour. A minority of pupils use bad language, lack courtesy and drop litter. Bullying is uncommon, and staff sort it out effectively if it occurs. Pupils are happy to come to school and feel safe. They enjoy a good standard of pastoral care. Pupils benefit from a wide range of after-school clubs.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils follow a broad curriculum. Most learning is well organised. In a few subjects, pupils’ early studies do not prepare them for key stage 4 as well as they should. Staff provide extra reading support for those who need it.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Senior leaders have high expectations for pupils and staff. They have provided effective training to improve teachers’ skills. Leaders have ensured that pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) learn well. The trust that runs the school has given those responsible for governance the confidence to challenge leaders. Senior leaders and subject leaders have a good understanding of how the school needs to improve.
p.2
better?
In most subjects, leaders have organised the curriculum effectively. They have sequenced the work so that it builds on pupils’ existing knowledge and skills. Pupils learn well. However, in a small number of subjects, there are weaknesses in the key stage 3 curriculum. As a result, some pupils are not prepared as well as they should be for their work in Years 10 and 11 and too few pupils follow the English Baccalaureate in key stage 4.
p.2
better?
Teachers put the curriculum into practice well. They know their subjects, use the right technical vocabulary, and have access to good-quality resources. Teachers explain ideas well. They check on what pupils have learned, and make sure that teaching fills any gaps in pupils’ knowledge. Pupils know how to improve their work. Those pupils with SEND learn well. Teachers are ambitious for these pupils and understand precisely how to meet their individual needs. Pupils in the resourced provision for pupils with SEND thrive.
p.2
better?
A high proportion of pupils start Year 7 with low reading ages. Leaders have recently extended their support for weaker readers at key stage 3. They have implemented several appropriate schemes. Staff are well trained to deliver these. However, as the support has only recently been introduced, the full impact has yet to be seen.
p.2
better?
In many lessons, warm relationships between teachers and pupils mean that pupils behave well. Sometimes, their behaviour is exceptional. However, on occasions, , a 27 and 28 April 2022
p.2
3
few pupils disrupt the learning for others. At breaktimes and lunchtimes, a minority of pupils show significant disrespect for their peers and for the environment. Although leaders’ expectations for the management of behaviour are clear, staff are not consistent in identifying poor conduct and holding pupils to account.
p.3
3
Pupils develop a good understanding of personal safety, relationships and social topics as part of a coordinated programme. Activities in form time and English lessons give pupils confidence to express their views orally. In humanities and creative subjects, pupils learn about different cultures and traditions. Pupils have opportunities to adopt leadership roles. Sixth-form students have contributed well to the school’s promotion of equality and diversity. Personal development for post-16 students is particularly strong.
p.3
3
The school provides good independent careers advice. At the end of key stage 4 and the sixth form, very few pupils do not go on to appropriate education or training. Pupils benefit from a wide range of extra-curricular activity, for example in staging ‘Shrek the musical’.
p.3
3
More recently, leaders have acted successfully to raise standards in the sixth form, and to improve provision for pupils with SEND. They have established a strong culture of staff training. Subject leaders are keen to improve further. Staff say that senior leaders consider their workload and are appropriately concerned for their well-being.
p.3
3
Since the previous inspection, the multi-academy trust (MAT) has clarified governance arrangements. Those responsible for governance now have a thorough understanding of the school and are holding leaders to account. The opportunity to study one subject at another school in the MAT enhances the post-16 curriculum.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Pupils learn about the risks that they may face, including that of sexual harassment. Leaders make sure that staff are well trained in safeguarding, so that they know how to identify pupils at risk. They keep staff updated about local issues that might pose a threat. Leaders take the right actions and involve other agencies that work with children. They are persistent when the need arises.
p.3
Safeguarding
The school keeps the necessary records. Leaders make the right checks on the staff who join the school.
p.3
Safeguarding
Pupils know that there is always an adult to talk to. They feel safe at school.
p.3
4
During social times, there is a lack of consistency in the way staff uphold the school’s expectations for pupils’ behaviour. As a result, a minority of pupils use inappropriate language, barge through doorways and drop litter. Leaders should ensure that all staff recognise their responsibility to uphold the school’s behaviour policy in this respect, and make sure that they do so. In a minority of subjects, the key stage 3 curriculum does not prepare pupils for key stage 4 as well as it should. As a result, some pupils are less inclined to study some subjects at key stage 4. Leaders should make sure that the endpoints for every subject at key stage 3 provide pupils with the best possible basis for their future studies. Leaders have introduced additional support to improve pupils’ reading skills where required. This is yet to have the full impact intended. Leaders should continue to develop this support to ensure that pupils develop fluency, confidence
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 27 and 28 April 2022
p.4
provision
Number of pupils on the school roll 1,498
p.5
Date of previous inspection
20 and 21 June 2018, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
Shire Oak Academy is one of six schools in The Mercian Trust. Four of these are secondary schools, one is a studio school and one is an alternative provision free school. The school has a specially resourced provision for 10 pupils with dyslexia. The headteacher took up her post in September 2020. The school meets the requirements of the Baker Clause, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships. The school uses nine registered providers for alternative provision. These are attended by 10 pupils full time, and eight part time. 27 and 28 April 2022
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.6
Information about this inspection
This was the first routine inspection the school had received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders, and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors met with the headteacher and other senior leaders. Meetings were held with curriculum leaders and the special educational needs coordinator. Inspectors also met with a range of other staff (including early career teachers), trustees and officers of the MAT, and members of the local governing board to which the MAT delegates oversight of some aspects of the school’s work. Inspectors spoke with pupils at social times, and with groups of pupils more formally. When inspecting safeguarding, inspectors looked at the school’s procedures for recruiting and checking on staff. They also considered the effectiveness of staff training and the procedures to keep pupils safe.
p.6
Information about this inspection
Inspectors reviewed a range of documents, including leaders’ plans to improve the school, records of meetings of the local governing board and the school’s attendance and behaviour records. The inspection team took account of the responses to Ofsted Parent View, Ofsted’s questionnaire for parents and carers, including narrative comments. Inspectors also considered responses to Ofsted’s surveys for staff and pupils. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English; mathematics; modern foreign languages; geography and art. In these subjects, inspectors considered the school’s curriculum guidance, visited lessons and scrutinised pupils’ work. Inspectors also met with pupils and with teachers to discuss learning in these subjects. On the second day of the inspection, inspectors looked at the curriculum in several other subjects. An inspector listened to a sample of pupils from Years 7, 8 and 9 reading to a
p.6
Inspection team
Martin Spoor, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Steve Byatt Ofsted Inspector 27 and 28 April 2022
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion