Early years · Early years complaint outcome
Little Tigers
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
21 Jul 2022
- URN verified
2658593
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 347
- about usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 39, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills is leading Ofsted's work into how regulated early years and childcare providers in England have delivered child- centred practice and care, within the context of the restrictions placed on society during the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic.
p.1
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 25 April 2022, we received concerns that the provider was not meeting some of these requirements. We asked the provider to conduct an internal review of the concerns. On 13 June 2022, we also held a telephone regulatory call with the provider. We found the provider was not meeting some of the requirements. We also found new areas of concern. This means that the provider was not meeting other requirements as set out in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage. However, we are satisfied the provider has taken action to ensure there is a deputy manager in post and ensured all children have a key person. We have issued actions for the provider to take. The provider will be able to give parents further information about this.
p.1
Summary of outcome
-ensure the designated safeguarding lead improves their understanding of the correct reporting procedures to follow in line with the local safeguarding partners.
p.1
Summary of outcome
-Improve supervision to ensure staff understand their roles and responsibilities, including the settings policies and procedures, including how to conduct professional discussions with parents.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We reviewed the provider's response and found this to be satisfactory. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.2
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.
p.2
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion