Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Lord Grey Academy
Summary
Lucy English (lead), Andrew Morrison, Cathy Reid, Jane Cartwright, Paul James, Peter Rodin
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
25 May 2022
- Inspectors AI-checked
Andrew Morrison, Cathy Reid, Jane Cartwright, Lucy English, Paul James, Peter Rodin
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
MK3 6EW
- Name on report verified
Lord Grey Academy
- URN verified
145736
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Leaders need to ensure that all staff share the same high expectations demonstrated by leaders and follow the agreed processes to manage behaviour consistently. p.4
- Leaders have created a focused learning community where the vast majority of pupils enjoy learning and can see that they are making good progress through the curriculum. p.2
- Many pupils are frustrated that there are a few pupils who sometimes resist the high expectations that staff have for them. p.2
- Consequently, staff adapt learning very well and make sure that pupils with SEND are fully included. p.3
- The SENCo manages a skilled team who help these pupils to quickly gain the knowledge they need to become confident, fluent readers. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Reading & phonics3
“Some pupils join the school having fallen behind with reading.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,128
- about usual (typical 1098)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 57, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 13%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Lord Grey Academy Rickley Lane, Bletchley, Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire MK3 6EW
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Sixth-form provision Good
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 24 and 25 May 2022
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
The school values of determination, ambition, curiosity, civility, and integrity have steadily taken hold at Lord Grey Academy. Pupils recognise the power of these qualities, and most are proud to display them and are motivated by the ‘value points’ that they receive for their actions. Pupils excitedly explain why they received points and the difference their actions have made to their learning or to the school community. They enjoy the meaningful opportunities related to character education and recognise how these help to develop them as rounded individuals.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Staff and pupils have positive working relationships. Pupils know that staff have their best interests at heart. This creates a sense of trust where pupils will have a go with their learning, even when it is difficult. Lessons are often joyful as pupils make connections with prior learning and realise that they have built their knowledge well.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
However, there is also frustration. Many pupils are frustrated that there are a few pupils who sometimes resist the high expectations that staff have for them. These pupils can disrupt lessons and social time. Overall, though, behaviour is good. Pupils feel safe and trust teachers to continue to deal with poor behaviour and any unkind acts or words.
p.2
better?
Leaders have created a focused learning community where the vast majority of pupils enjoy learning and can see that they are making good progress through the curriculum. There is a buzz of positivity in lessons and around the school.
p.2
better?
Due to this culture of learning, more and more students stay on for the sixth form. Staff work hard to make sure that students go to whichever provider is right for them and their aspirations, not just stay on where they are comfortable. This is typical of the moral focus of leaders: they want the best for each pupil in the school. Across the school, careers information, education, advice and guidance is planned and delivered successfully.
p.2
better?
The well-considered curriculum is now secure across most of the school. Subject leaders aim to put the building blocks of knowledge that pupils need in the best order. Leaders recognise that this is not yet right across all year groups in some subjects. In these cases, pupils’ learning is hindered because their learning does not build effectively enough.
p.2
better?
Pupils respond well to the whole-school routines including assessment checks on prior learning. Teachers use this information to adapt learning for pupils but have generally already prepared for this because they know pupils so well. This is especially the case for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). 24 and 25 May 2022
p.2
3
Support for pupils with SEND is a strength of the school. The special educational needs co-ordinator (SENCo) ensures that all staff have detailed understanding of pupils’ needs and know how best to meet them. Consequently, staff adapt learning very well and make sure that pupils with SEND are fully included. A high proportion stay on to the sixth form, going on to ambitious futures.
p.3
3
Some pupils join the school having fallen behind with reading. The SENCo manages a skilled team who help these pupils to quickly gain the knowledge they need to become confident, fluent readers. Across the school staff promote reading for pleasure and learning. Pupils understand how fundamental it is to future success. Some adore the fortnightly reading lessons, but others see them as less important and so do not work as hard as they do elsewhere.
p.3
3
Overall, attitudes to learning are very positive but there is frustration at the small minority of pupils who do not follow the rules. At these times, the attention of teachers is diverted from those who do want to learn. Not all staff follow the school behaviour management processes consistently. This undermines the clear messages and expectations. Leaders are acting appropriately to address this situation, but pupils and parents want to see more rapid results.
p.3
3
Pupils’ personal development is a strength of the school. Leaders ensure that all pupils have a wide range of opportunities. Pupils engage well with these and are keen to discuss tricky moral issues or consider their aims for modern British society.
p.3
3
Leadership at all levels is effective. In particular, the multi-academy trust (MAT) has supported staff development well. Local governors hold leaders to account to ensure that standards are high. Staff feel well supported and able to focus on their teaching.
p.3
3
Historically, the proportion of pupils entered for the English Baccalaureate is low, with few pupils taking a foreign language GCSE. Leaders have addressed this successfully and more pupils than ever before are due to continue with these studies.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
All staff know what to look for and how to use the school processes if they have any worry about a pupil. They follow these processes well and leaders take prompt and appropriate action when concerns are raised. They work well with external agencies to secure help for pupils and their families.
p.3
Safeguarding
Pupils follow a comprehensive programme of lessons, assemblies and events that help them to learn how to identify risks and keep themselves safe, including when online. Pupils are confident that staff take their worries seriously and will act on their concerns. 24 and 25 May 2022
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
In some subject areas, the sequence of learning over time is still being refined. Where it is weaker, pupils’ learning does not build effectively enough. Leaders need to ensure that this work is completed and that all staff understand how to ensure that pupils retain and recall their knowledge from their learning. A minority of pupils display challenging behaviour. There is sometimes inconsistency of application of the school’s behaviour management processes. Consequently, some pupils have their learning disrupted in some lessons. Leaders need to ensure that all staff share the same high expectations demonstrated by leaders and follow the agreed processes to manage behaviour consistently.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 24 and 25 May 2022
p.4
School details
Inspection number 10227796 Type of school Secondary
p.5
provision
Number of pupils on the school roll 1,432
p.5
sixth form
Principal Jim Parker (Executive Principal) Samantha Satyanadhan (Associate Principal) Website www.lordgrey.org.uk
p.5
sixth form
Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected
p.5
Information about this school
Lord Grey Academy converted to become an academy school in April 2018, when it joined the Tove Learning Trust MAT. When its predecessor school, Lord Grey School, was last inspected by Ofsted, it was judged to be good overall. When the school joined the MAT, there was a change of leadership. The current executive principal took up post as principal. In September 2021, he moved to be executive principal and the associate principal took over the day-to-day running of the school. The MAT established a new local governing body, including a new chair of the local governing body. The school makes use of one unregistered and two registered alternative providers. The pupils attending the unregistered alternative provider do so for one or two days a week and are at the school for the rest of the week. 24 and 25 May 2022
p.5
6
The school ensures that a range of education and training providers speak to pupils from Years 8 to 13 so that they find out about the different options available to them. As a result, the school meets the requirements of the Baker Clause.
p.6
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.6
Information about this inspection
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors met with the executive principal, the associate principal and other members of the leadership team, including the SENCo and head of the sixth form. The lead inspector met with the chair of trustees and the chief executive officer from the Tove Learning Trust MAT. She also met with two governors, including the chair of the local governing body. Inspectors carried out deep dives into these subjects: English, science, geography, art, languages and physical education. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors also visited lessons in some other subjects, including
p.6
Information about this inspection
mathematics and design technology, and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors evaluated the effectiveness of the safeguarding arrangements in the school by speaking with leaders, staff and pupils. The lead inspector met with the designated and deputy designated safeguarding leads to examine their knowledge. During these meetings, the lead inspector scrutinised records and sampled case files to explore how the school identifies and supports pupils at risk of harm. A team inspector examined the school’s work to recruit and check on the suitability of staff. Another inspector telephoned the alternative providers to discuss safeguarding and pupils’ learning. Inspectors took account of the views of parents by considering the responses to the Ofsted Parent View survey, the accompanying free-text comments and an email sent by a parent during the inspection. They considered staff views by talking to them individually, in groups and through the online staff questionnaire.
p.6
Information about this inspection
They spoke to pupils formally and informally, in groups and around the school, as well as considering the responses to the online pupil questionnaire.
p.6
Inspection team
Lucy English, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Cathy Reid Ofsted Inspector 24 and 25 May 2022
p.6
7
Paul James Ofsted Inspector 24 and 25 May 2022
p.7
8
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
8
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
8
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
8
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
8
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion