Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Northern Counties School
Summary
Sarah Hubbard (lead), Alison Aitchison, Michelle Farr, Paul Barton
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
11 May 2022
- Inspectors verified
Alison Aitchison, Michelle Farr, Paul Barton, Sarah Hubbard
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Requires improvement
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Postcode verified
NE2 3BB
- Name on report verified
Northern Counties School
- URN verified
108551
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentRequires improvement
- Quality of educationInadequate
3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The remote curriculum for those pupils required to learn from home on a regular basis is weak. p.2
- There are weaknesses in leaders’, directors’ and governors’ oversight of the school’s work. p.3
- The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective. p.3
- This has placed staff and pupils at risk. p.4
- Current approaches to teaching phonics vary too much between different groups, with some approaches being ineffective. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Teachers do not always use the information they gather from assessing pupils’ work to identify gaps pupils may have and what content they need to revisit. p.4
- Leaders must make sure that staff have the training they require to meet the p.4
- Leaders must revise their approaches to working with pupils who display sexualised behaviour, placing greater emphasis on the safeguarding risks posed by this behaviour. p.4
- Leaders and teachers must improve the design and implementation of the curriculum. p.4
- They must make sure that that learning activities build on pupils’ prior knowledge. p.4
- Leaders and teachers must also ensure that teaching enables pupils with complex additional needs to gain new knowledge and to apply it in different contexts. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance26
“There are weaknesses in leaders’, directors’ and governors’ oversight of the school’s work.” p.3Records & policies5
“Procedures for keeping pupils safe on site are not always adhered to.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 1,589
- about usual (typical 1552)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 54, typical 53
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 6
- Hedged sentences
- 19%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Northern Counties School Tankerville Terrace, Jesmond, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, Tyne and Wear NE2 3BB
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Inadequate Sixth-form provision Inadequate Previous inspection grade Good 10 and 11 May 2022
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils’ experiences at the school vary. Some parents and carers praise the school’s work. Others are concerned about teaching and the way in which staff manage pupils’ behaviour.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Over the past year, some pupils, including post-16 students, have shown heightened anxiety. This is in part because the staff working with them do not know pupils’ individual needs well enough. Some staff do not know how to support pupils when they are in crisis. This has led to an increase in aggressive behaviour in some classes.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Leaders regularly request that a significant minority of pupils remain at home because there are not enough staff to meet their needs. Many of these pupils find this erratic attendance pattern hard to manage. It disrupts their routines. The remote education provided by the school does not meet the needs of most pupils. Many struggle to learn when at home.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Staff really care about the pupils and are keen to do their best for them. Pupils benefit from therapies that are woven into activities throughout the day. Pupils are taught about respect. Unkindness between pupils in school is extremely rare.
p.2
better?
Leaders are not ambitious enough for the pupils in the school, including post-16 students. Curriculum plans show that pupils should be taught some subject-related knowledge and skills. However, the taught curriculum does not enable pupils to gain the curriculum content outlined in these plans. This is because pupils, including post-16 students, undertake too many low-level tasks, such as colouring in pictures. These tasks do not enable pupils to build up knowledge and skills over time.
p.2
better?
The remote curriculum for those pupils required to learn from home on a regular basis is weak. It is not well planned and sequenced. In subject areas such as English and mathematics, online resources for remote learning do not meet the needs of most pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), especially those with autism spectrum disorder. Remote education for pupils with complex physical needs is better than it is for other groups of pupils.
p.2
better?
Teaching approaches and activities designed to help pupils learn are not always suitable for pupils with SEND. Staff do not have the skills or knowledge needed to support pupils with SEND to remember the content taught. Pupils and post-16 students undertake standalone activities that do not link well enough to what has gone before. Sometimes, teaching staff use resources that are not suitable, for example, ones that contain too much information for pupils to read and understand. In addition, teachers do not use information from their assessment of pupils’ work to identify any gaps in knowledge and skills that pupils may have. 10 and 11 May 2022
p.2
3
Leaders have not ensured that approaches to the teaching of phonics are effective. Phonics is stronger in the classes for deaf pupils than in departments for pupils with autism spectrum disorder. In these classes, approaches to teaching phonics are not suitable. For example, teachers do not focus enough on matching sounds to letter shapes. Teachers are in the process of introducing a new phonics scheme. Although this is a step in the right direction, the scheme has not been fully implemented. Senior leaders have not placed enough emphasis on putting this important development in place.
p.3
3
Some staff have not received the essential training that they need to implement the school’s behaviour policies. Shortfalls in staffing have meant that staff are deployed to work with pupils they do not know. Both of these issues have meant that staff do not always manage pupils’ behaviour well. This has led to an increase in staff injuries. Some staff expressed concern about the way behaviour is managed in school.
p.3
3
When in school, pupils take part in a wide range of additional opportunities, such as the Duke of Edinburgh’s Award scheme. Pupils also go on trips to interesting places. The personal development programme taught in school enables pupils, including post-16 students, to prepare for most aspects of adulthood. It includes effective independent careers advice, which enables the school to meet the requirements of the Baker Clause, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships. However, the remote curriculum does not enable most pupils to gain the knowledge they need to contribute positively to school life.
p.3
3
There are weaknesses in leaders’, directors’ and governors’ oversight of the school’s work. Senior leaders and trust directors have not collated insights from their monitoring to gain an accurate view of the school’s strengths and weaknesses. Governors and trustees do not have enough insight into the effect that staffing issues are having on pupils and other staff. This includes some staff having additional workload. Governors and trustees have not insisted that leaders and directors do more to mitigate the negative impact of the staffing situation.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Procedures for keeping pupils safe on site are not always adhered to. For example, inspectors were able to gain entrance into the main school building without having any identity checks.
p.3
Safeguarding
The checks made on pupils when they are learning from home are not recorded systematically enough, nor in sufficient detail. Leaders have not consistently checked that these pupils are safe. Leaders do not ensure that pupils learning from home who are subject to safeguarding concerns receive additional welfare checks. 10 and 11 May 2022
p.3
4
Some staff do not have sufficient expertise in meeting pupils’ behavioural needs, including managing sexualised behaviours. This has placed staff and pupils at risk.
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Leaders have not placed enough emphasis on ensuring the safety and well-being of pupils who are required to learn at home. They have not ensured that safeguarding and welfare checks are systematic and recorded in detail. Leaders must strengthen their procedures for making sure that pupils are safe when learning remotely. In particular, they should make sure that pupils identified as having particular safeguarding issues receive additional checks. Safeguarding procedures and systems around the site are not tight enough. This places pupils at risk. Leaders should ensure that procedures for visitors entering the site are consistently implemented. They should also make sure that the site is safe for all pupils. Leaders have not ensured that staff have the training required to support pupils who display complex behaviours, including sexualised and aggressive behaviours. Leaders must make sure that staff have the training they require to meet the
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
behavioural needs of the pupils in their care. Leaders must revise their approaches to working with pupils who display sexualised behaviour, placing greater emphasis on the safeguarding risks posed by this behaviour. The curriculum, including the remote curriculum, is not ambitious enough for pupils. Pupils, including post-16 students, spend too much time on disconnected activities. Leaders and teachers must improve the design and implementation of the curriculum. They must make sure that that learning activities build on pupils’ prior knowledge. Leaders and teachers must also ensure that teaching enables pupils with complex additional needs to gain new knowledge and to apply it in different contexts. This includes developing the knowledge and skills pupils need to make a positive contribution to school life. Current approaches to teaching phonics vary too much between different groups, with some approaches being ineffective. Although new, more suitable approaches
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
are in the pipeline, these have not yet been implemented. Leaders must ensure that planned improvements in phonics are fully implemented as soon as possible, including any training that staff require. They must monitor the impact of these to ensure that they work well across all departments. Teachers do not always use the information they gather from assessing pupils’ work to identify gaps pupils may have and what content they need to revisit. Leaders and teachers need to develop approaches to assessment so that it enables them to identify exactly what pupils need to learn and remember. Leaders and trust directors are not using the information they gather from monitoring activities to gain a deep insight into the school’s strengths and weaknesses. As a result, they are unclear about the quality of education on offer for pupils. Leaders and directors must use the information they gather to make 10 and 11 May 2022
p.4
5
accurate evaluations of the quality of the provision and its impact on pupils’ day- to-day experiences. Governors and trustees have not placed enough emphasis on making sure that there is a stable staff body with the training needed to meet pupils’ needs. In addition, they have not challenged leaders and directors to mitigate the negative impact that staffing issues are having on pupils, and on staff workload. Governors and trustees must ensure staffing is stable. They must insist that leaders, including directors, prioritise mitigating the negative impact of any ongoing staffing issues.
p.5
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.5
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.5
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.5
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.5
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 10 and 11 May 2022
p.5
School details
School category Non-maintained special school
p.6
Date of previous inspection
28 and 29 March 2017, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.6
Information about this school
Northern Counties School is a special school. It is part of The Percy Hedley Foundation, which is a registered charity providing a range of services to children, young people and adults with SEND. All pupils at Northern Counties School have education, health and care (EHC) plans. The school has five departments. One is for pupils with profound and multiple learning difficulties, two are for pupils with autism spectrum disorder (Hillcrest and Armstrong), and one department is for deaf pupils. Some pupils have a combination of these needs. The current chief executive officer of The Percy Hedley Foundation was appointed in April 2022. There are a small number of post-16 students in the school. There is no separate sixth-form provision and post-16 students are educated with key stage 4 pupils. 10 and 11 May 2022
p.6
7
The school does not use alternative provision.
p.7
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.7
Information about this inspection
In accordance with section 44(1) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires special measures because it is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the persons responsible for leading, managing or governing the school are not demonstrating the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school.
p.7
Information about this inspection
This was the first routine inspection the school had received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders, and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Meetings were held separately with the headteacher and senior leaders. Inspectors met with members of staff, including support staff individually and in pairs and also taxi drivers who take pupils to and from school. They spoke with a small number of parents in person and on the telephone. Inspectors held meetings with a director and the chief executive officer from The Percy Hedley Foundation. They also met with the chair of the local governing body, the governor responsible for safeguarding and a trustee. Inspectors also met with the assistant director of education at Newcastle City Council, local authority commissioners, a safeguarding consultant from an independent company and a consultant employed by the school as a school
p.7
Information about this inspection
improvement partner. Inspectors spoke separately with a group of boys and a group of girls. They also spoke informally with pupils. Inspectors carried out deep dives in reading (including early reading), mathematics, creative subjects, and language and communication. For each deep dive, inspectors met with subject leaders, looked at curriculum plans, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors reviewed documentation relating to the school’s curriculum, along with the school’s own self-evaluation and its development plans. Inspectors also sampled EHC plans for four pupils, as well as internal plans detailing the individual support that these pupils require. Inspectors reviewed the comments made by parents on Ofsted Parent View and 47 responses to the staff survey. Inspectors reviewed emails they had received
p.7
Information about this inspection
from a small number of parents. The single central record was checked. Two meetings were held with the designated safeguarding lead. An inspector also reviewed records of safeguarding training, concerns and referrals. 10 and 11 May 2022
p.7
Inspection team
Sarah Hubbard, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.8
Inspection team
Alison Aitchison Her Majesty’s Inspector 10 and 11 May 2022
p.8
9
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.9
9
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.9
9
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.9
9
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.9
9
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion