Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

The Rose School

Inspected 25 May 2022 · published 19 Jul 2022 · URN 134625

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Claire Cropper (lead), Elaine Parkinson, Nell Banfield

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    25 May 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    Claire Cropper, Elaine Parkinson, Nell Banfield

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    BB11 4DT

  • Name on report verified

    The Rose School

  • URN verified

    134625

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2015.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+24Mostly positivemore positive than 54% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseimprovedhigh-qualityeffectivelyeffectiveunsafefeel safehappyclear
Criticismseriousat riskdisruptionconcernsnot ambitiousunevenharmnot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1136w+30
  • Safeguarding104w+3
  • What needs to improve28w—

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,236
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 59, typical 56
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 60%Safeguarding 6%What needs to improve 1%About the inspection 33%

Full report text

Inspection of The Rose School Greenock Street, Burnley, Lancashire BB11 4DT

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Good 24 and 25 May 2022

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils told inspectors that they feel safe, happy and well cared for at school. They said that the school is a much calmer place than it used to be. Leaders deal with bullying effectively.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils learn how to improve their personal well-being. Activities such as The Duke of Edinburgh’s Award help pupils to develop their independence and social skills. Pupils benefit from activities that support them to believe in themselves and to try new things.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils said that leaders do not give up on them. The curriculum that leaders have designed motivates pupils to increase their aspiration. However, leaders do not build on this well enough. They do not insist on the highest expectations for all pupils’ achievement. Some pupils do not achieve as well as they should. This limits their choices for their next stages of education, training or employment.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders expect pupils to behave well. Pupils learn how to manage their own behaviour. Leaders ensure that staff understand how to support pupils to accomplish this. Incidents of serious misbehaviour have decreased considerably over time. Pupils demonstrate improved attitudes to learning. However, some pupils do not attend school regularly enough. This hinders how well they learn.

p.2

better?

All pupils in this school have special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Leaders provide clear guidance for staff so that they understand how best to support each pupil.

p.2

better?

Leaders have begun to shape a curriculum that captures the interest of pupils. In key stage 3, the broad topics within the curriculum develop what pupils have learned in key stage 2. Teachers prompt pupils to recall what they have learned in the past and in other subjects. This helps pupils to build new learning from key stage 2 to key stage 3.

p.2

better?

Leaders are increasingly clear about what they want pupils to learn within topics. However, they have not thought carefully enough about what they want pupils to learn in each year group. This means that some teachers are unsure about which key learning to focus on. Consequently, pupils’ recall of earlier learning is uneven.

p.2

better?

In key stage 4, a high proportion of pupils access their learning off site. Leaders are not ambitious enough for these pupils. For example, leaders do not ensure that this group of pupils access the same breadth of curriculum that they would if they were in school. In addition, these pupils do not have the same opportunities to develop their reading knowledge as those pupils attending school do. 24 and 25 May 2022

p.2

3

Teachers and tutors make sure that those pupils educated off site make progress in their chosen field of study. However, these pupils do not achieve qualifications or accreditation across a wide range of subjects. Their choices at the end of key stage 4 are reduced as a result.

p.3

3

Leaders have designed a new reading curriculum. All staff are trained well in how to enhance pupils’ reading habits. Leaders have improved pupils’ interest and enjoyment in reading through regular class sessions. Nonetheless, leaders do not ensure that all teachers deliver these sessions as agreed. Additionally, some teachers do not expect all pupils to take an active part in lessons.

p.3

3

There are pupils across the school who do not have the phonics knowledge that they need to work out what unfamiliar words say. This means that they are unable to access the curriculum independently. Leaders have very recently introduced a phonics programme to support pupils who find reading difficult. However, teachers have not begun to deliver this programme.

p.3

3

Pupils benefit from leaders’ new approach to behaviour management. They listen respectfully to their teachers and to each other most of the time. Most pupils said that their attitude to learning has improved because of the support that they receive from leaders and other staff. Disruption to learning is minimised.

p.3

3

However, some pupils’ irregular attendance at school affects how well they learn. Pupils with low attendance do not achieve as well as they should because they do not access the support on offer to them. Leaders permit some pupils to be educated off site at times when their SEND needs could be met at school.

p.3

3

Pupils respond well to the high-quality opportunities that leaders provide to develop personal qualities, such as confidence and resilience. Many pupils appreciate being outdoors as this helps them to regain composure or reflect on how they are feeling. Pupils enjoy exploring the wooded area that they have designed and made themselves. Here they cook, build shelters and take part in team-building activities.

p.3

3

Leaders have made substantial improvements to the culture of the school. This enables pupils and staff to focus on learning. Governors support leaders effectively in this work. However, governors are not as effective in challenging leaders to drive forward improvements to the curriculum. Governors do not ensure that all pupils access the highest standard of education possible.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders ensure that all staff are trained well in safeguarding. Staff are vigilant in checking that pupils do not bring unsafe items into school. They identify quickly when a pupil is showing signs of being at risk of potential harm. Staff pass on their concerns diligently to leaders who are responsible for safeguarding. Leaders ensure that effective support is in place for vulnerable pupils. 24 and 25 May 2022

p.3

4

When pupils’ anxiety builds, leaders make sure that pupils and staff remain safe. Leaders also ensure that pupils know and follow the school rules about staying safe when online.

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Leaders do not ensure that pupils attend school regularly enough. As a result, some pupils are not prepared well for the responsibilities of adulthood or the world of work. Leaders should support pupils well to attend school regularly so that they can develop a wide range of knowledge and skills.  Leaders do not ensure that some pupils benefit from the full curriculum. This limits pupils’ choices for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Leaders should ensure that these pupils access a broad, high-quality curriculum that enables them to achieve well.  Some pupils do not receive the support that they need to develop secure reading knowledge. Consequently, these pupils are not able to access the curriculum independently. Leaders should ensure that pupils who have fallen behind with their reading are supported to catch up quickly.  Leaders do not provide sufficient guidance to teaching staff about what they

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

expect pupils to learn in each year group. As a result, teachers are hindered in designing learning for pupils. Leaders should ensure that teachers are supported well to design learning that helps pupils to develop a rich body of knowledge over time.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 24 and 25 May 2022

p.4

School details

Inspection number 10210893 Type of school Special

p.5

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 28 March 2019, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school caters for pupils with SEND. Most pupils have social, emotional and mental health or autism spectrum disorder as their primary need. All pupils have an education, health and care plan.  Leaders use alternative provision for some pupils at three registered providers and two unregistered providers.  The school meets the Baker Clause. This means that pupils in Years 8 to 13 receive information about the full range of education for a range of education and training options open to them. This includes opportunities for a range of education and training providers to speak to pupils about technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.  Since the time of the previous inspection a new headteacher and deputy headteacher have been appointed. 24 and 25 May 2022

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.6

Information about this inspection

 This was the first routine inspection that the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors spoke with the headteacher and other leaders in the school, including the leader for SEND. Inspectors spoke with a small group of governors, including the chair of governors.  Inspectors looked at a range of documentation relating to safeguarding. This included the school’s central record of staff and visitors, staff training records, records of safeguarding, and samples of pupils’ records.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in reading, mathematics, physical education and humanities subjects, including history and geography. They talked with the curriculum leaders of these subject areas. Inspectors also visited lessons, looked at examples of pupils’ work, held discussions with teachers and talked with pupils.

p.6

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour at breaktimes and lunchtimes. They observed pupils’ behaviour as they moved around the school.  Inspectors spoke with staff and pupils about pupils’ experiences at school.  Inspectors spoke with staff who deliver off-site learning. They also spoke with staff from some of the alternative providers that pupils attend.  There were insufficient responses to Ofsted Parent View. Inspectors considered the free-text responses from parents and carers. They also spoke with some parents on the telephone.  Inspectors considered responses to Ofsted’s online survey for staff.  There were no responses to Ofsted’s online survey for pupils.

p.6

Inspection team

Claire Cropper, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Elaine Parkinson Ofsted Inspector 24 and 25 May 2022

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion