Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Care Perspectives Ltd in Walsall
Summary
Melanie Griffin (lead), Sarah Berry
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Care Perspectives Limited
- Inspection date verified
7 Jun 2022
- Inspectors verified
Melanie Griffin, Sarah Berry
- Helped and protected verified
Requires improvement to be good
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement to be good
- Name on report verified
1263977
- URN verified
1263977
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2021.
- OverallRI to be good
- Helped and protectedRI to be good
- Leadership and managementInadequate
13% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement to be good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement to be good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This is the result of inadequate care planning by all professionals involved in the child’s care, lack of escalation and challenge by this home’s leaders and managers and poor decision-making by the home’s leaders, managers and staff. p.3
- In addition, leaders and managers have failed to identify that staff’s recording of incidents is poor and does not provide a coherent account of what has occurred. p.5
- The delay and lack of a thorough response has meant that the child remains unclear of the outcome. p.4
- The effectiveness of leaders and managers inadequate p.1
- This poor practice leaves children vulnerable to harm. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- In particular, the registered person should ensure that when the needs of children are not met by other agencies that they escalate their concerns effectively. 11 August 2022 p.6
- In particular, the manager must ensure that when there are concerns about the safety and welfare of children that child protection policies are adhered to and that effective action is taken. p.7
- The manager must ensure that staff have the necessary skills to consider risks to children and take appropriate action in response. p.7
- When a child is not at the home, thorough risk assessments that consider the locations where they are staying or visiting should be in place. p.7
- In particular, the manager should ensure that staff have the experience and skills to make decisions that consider the needs of the children, taking into account all known and predictable risks. p.7
- This requirement was made at the last inspection and is restated. p.8
- In particular, the manager should ensure that children receive care and support as directed in their care plans to meet their individual needs. 11 August 2022 p.8
- In particular, the manager should ensure that all case records are up to date and recording is clear and objective. 11 August 2022 p.8
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,297
- about usual (typical 1899)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report for children’s home: 1263977 1 Registered provider: Care Perspectives Limited Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this children’s home
This home provides specialist care for up to eight children with mental health difficulties and/or associated complex needs. The home was registered in December 2017.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
There were six children living in the home at the time of the inspection.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The current manager was appointed in December 2021. She has submitted her application to register with Ofsted.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
requires improvement to be good
How well children and young people are helped and protected requires improvement to be good
p.1
requires improvement to be good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers inadequate
p.1
requires improvement to be good
The children’s home is not yet delivering good help and care for children and young people. However, there are no serious or widespread failures that result in their welfare not being safeguarded or promoted.
p.1
requires improvement to be good
Overall judgement at last inspection: sustained effectiveness
p.1
requires improvement to be good
Enforcement action since last inspection: none Inspection report for children’s home: 1263977 2
p.1
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement
29/03/2022 Interim Sustained effectiveness 23/06/2021 Full Requires improvement to be good 11/03/2020 Interim Sustained effectiveness 10/09/2019 Full Good Inspection report for children’s home: 1263977 3
p.2
improvement to be good
The experiences of children living in this home are mixed. Staff are supporting some children to make progress and become safer. When needed, staff take quick and effective action to safeguard children. Overall, managers and staff work well with other professionals and will advocate strongly to ensure that children’s needs are met and their welfare promoted. However, one child’s experience in this home has been poor. This is the result of inadequate care planning by all professionals involved in the child’s care, lack of escalation and challenge by this home’s leaders and managers and poor decision-making by the home’s leaders, managers and staff.
p.3
improvement to be good
The quality of relationships between children and staff varies. During the inspection, inspectors observed positive relationships between staff and children. However, some children told the inspector that they do not feel that staff listen to them or take the time to speak to them. On one occasion, staff did not act with sufficient care or skill and incorrectly informed a child that they were under a deprivation of liberty order when they were not. This had a detrimental impact on this child. As a result, not all children feel that they can trust staff or feel supported by them.
p.3
improvement to be good
Staff do not support all children to achieve positive educational outcomes. Some children do not have education placements and, as a result, these children have not made progress with their learning. In contrast, staff are supporting some children who are in the process of completing their exams and have a college placement for the next academic year. In addition, staff have supported another child to undertake voluntary work.
p.3
improvement to be good
Children have mixed day-to-day experiences. They have some positive opportunities, such as trips to the beach, barbecues at the home and other activities in the local community. However, there are times when staff do not encourage children to have a clear routine in place, despite the fact that this helps them. This does not support children to feel motivated to achieve and progress.
p.3
improvement to be good
Staff understand the physical health conditions of children and any risks associated with these conditions. Staff help children to attend their medical appointments and in the majority of cases will advocate on children’s behalf to ensure that they get the health services they require. However, records do not always show the reasons when medication is administered late. This is a missed opportunity to learn from and to minimise medication errors.
p.3
improvement to be good
The manager has begun involving children in their care plans and has started to consult children on a regular basis. This approach encourages the children to share their views and supports the staff to understand how children perceive risks. Inspection report for children’s home: 1263977 4 Staff help children to develop age-appropriate independence skills, so that they are more prepared for adult life. The children are proud of themselves and staff are proud of them too. This kind of affirmation is helping children to recognise their successes and want to build on them further.
p.3
improvement to be good
Staff do not always supervise children as set out in their plans of care. For example, on one occasion, staff should have kept a child in sight due to their presenting risks. However, staff did not do this and were not aware that the child had left the home. The manager has since put strategies in place to prevent this from happening again. However, records still do not demonstrate that staff carry out the required observations of children. Therefore, it is not known whether staff are caring for children as stipulated in their individual plans. This poor practice leaves children vulnerable to harm.
p.4
improvement to be good
Managers do not always demonstrate professional curiosity when responding to allegations raised by children. On one occasion, managers did not act or challenge relevant professionals when it was not clear whether appropriate action had been taken in relation to a child’s allegations. The delay and lack of a thorough response has meant that the child remains unclear of the outcome. This has impacted negatively on their well-being. Children’s concerns are not always acted on or escalated appropriately.
p.4
improvement to be good
The quality of risk assessments is inconsistent. For most children, risk assessments are detailed and contain information as well as strategies to support them. However, for one child, the impact risk assessment did not consider an incident when the child threatened to jump from a bridge. There were also subsequent incidents similar to this threat. Managers did not complete a thorough analysis of this risk when making the decision as to whether the home could safely meet the child’s needs. As a result, staff were not given sufficient guidance on how to keep the child safe.
p.4
improvement to be good
Overall, staff have a good understanding of why children self-harm and what to do to minimise this happening. When children do self-harm, staff take effective action to increase children’s safety and obtain medical advice. However, on one occasion, a child was given a razor for personal care, which led to the child harming themselves. The manager has taken action to address this shortfall in practice to minimise the risk of this happening again.
p.4
improvement to be good
The manager regularly reviews the use of physical intervention in the home to ensure that it is used only as a last resort. When a concern about the use of physical intervention was identified, the manager addressed this with the staff involved to develop their practice. However, staff and children are not always spoken to following each physical intervention. This hinders the learning for the staff and the support for children. Inspection report for children’s home: 1263977 5
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate
Leaders and managers have not consistently led the home with sufficient care or skill to ensure that all children receive care that promotes their welfare. Following concerns raised by one child, leaders and managers, with agreement from the placing authority, placed the child in unsuitable temporary accommodation. Leaders and managers did not fully consider the child’s risks, the location of the accommodation or the quality of the environment when placing the child. This poor practice does not promote children’s welfare.
p.5
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate
Leaders and managers have not always demonstrated a good understanding of children’s experiences or the impact of the quality of care children receive. This is because they do not always seek to establish all the necessary information relating to children’s care. This includes information relating to allegations made by children or what has occurred during incidents. In addition, leaders and managers have failed to identify that staff’s recording of incidents is poor and does not provide a coherent account of what has occurred. These factors limit leaders and managers’ understanding of what has happened. This prevents them from making improvements to the areas of children’s care they are responsible for or advocating on children’s behalf in other areas.
p.5
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate
Leaders and managers do not consistently challenge other professionals and agencies involved in the children’s care or escalate concerns when needed. This has contributed to the systemic failure in the care provided for one child by various agencies, including children’s services and the child and adolescent mental health services. These failures led to the child being without crucial healthcare or educational opportunities.
p.5
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate
Leaders and managers’ monitoring of the home is insufficient. They have failed to consistently identify shortfalls in practice and in the quality of care delivered to children. This means there are missed opportunities to develop practice and improve the care children receive.
p.5
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate
The manager has been in post since December 2021. Overall, parents and professionals were positive about the communication and support provided by the manager. To support the development of the service, there have been recent changes to the management structure to improve the oversight at the home. These changes are in their infancy and therefore their effectiveness is not yet clear.
p.5
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate
Staff receive regular supervision. However, while individual supervision takes place, it does not always consider the needs of the children. This is another missed opportunity to develop staff practice. Inspection report for children’s home: 1263977 6
p.5
Statutory requirements
This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.
p.6
Requirement Due date
In meeting the quality standards, the registered person must, and must ensure that staff—
p.6
Requirement Due date
seek to secure the input and services required to meet each child’s needs;
p.6
Requirement Due date
if the registered person considers, or staff consider, a placing authority’s or a relevant person’s performance or response to be inadequate in relation to their role, challenge the placing authority or the relevant person to seek to ensure that each child’s needs are met in accordance with the child’s relevant plans. (Regulation 5 (b)(c))
p.6
Requirement Due date
In particular, the registered person should ensure that when the needs of children are not met by other agencies that they escalate their concerns effectively. 11 August 2022
p.6
Requirement Due date
The protection of children standard is that children are protected from harm and enabled to keep themselves safe.
p.6
Requirement Due date
In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to ensure—
p.6
Requirement Due date
assess whether each child is at risk of harm, taking into account information in the child’s relevant plans, and, if necessary, make arrangements to reduce the risk of any harm to the child;
p.6
Requirement Due date
have the skills to identify and act upon signs that a child is at risk of harm;
p.6
Requirement Due date
take effective action whenever there is a serious concern about a child’s welfare; and 11 August 2022 Inspection report for children’s home: 1263977 7 are familiar with, and act in accordance with, the home’s child protection policies;
p.6
Requirement Due date
that the premises used for the purposes of the home are located so that children are effectively safeguarded. (Regulation 12 (1) (2)(a)(i)(iii)(vi)(vii)(c))
p.7
Requirement Due date
In particular, the manager must ensure that when there are concerns about the safety and welfare of children that child protection policies are adhered to and that effective action is taken. The manager must ensure that staff have the necessary skills to consider risks to children and take appropriate action in response. When a child is not at the home, thorough risk assessments that consider the locations where they are staying or visiting should be in place.
p.7
Requirement Due date
The leadership and management standard is that the registered person enables, inspires and leads a culture in relation to the children’s home that—
p.7
Requirement Due date
helps children aspire to fulfil their potential; and promotes their welfare.
p.7
Requirement Due date
In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to—
p.7
Requirement Due date
ensure that staff have the experience, qualifications and skills to meet the needs of each child;
p.7
Requirement Due date
demonstrate that practice in the home is informed and improved by taking into account and acting on—
p.7
Requirement Due date
feedback on the experiences of children, including complaints received; and
p.7
Requirement Due date
use monitoring and review systems to make continuous improvements in the quality of care provided in the home. (Regulation 13 (1)(a)(b) (2)(c)(g)(ii)(h))
p.7
Requirement Due date
In particular, the manager should ensure that staff have the experience and skills to make decisions that consider the needs of the children, taking into account all known and predictable risks. The manager should ensure that feedback provided to children on their experiences is given in a child- centred way and is clear on any findings. 11 August 2022 Inspection report for children’s home: 1263977 8 The manager must also ensure that monitoring systems are effective and that shortfalls are recognised and responded to effectively.
p.7
Requirement Due date
This requirement was made at the last inspection and is restated.
p.8
Requirement Due date
The care planning standard is that children—
p.8
Requirement Due date
receive effectively planned care in or through the children’s home;
p.8
Requirement Due date
In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to ensure—
p.8
Requirement Due date
that each child’s relevant plans are followed. (Regulation 14 (1)(a) (2)(c))
p.8
Requirement Due date
In particular, the manager should ensure that children receive care and support as directed in their care plans to meet their individual needs. 11 August 2022
p.8
Requirement Due date
ensure that the records are kept up to date. (Regulation 37 (2)(b))
p.8
Requirement Due date
In particular, the manager should ensure that all case records are up to date and recording is clear and objective. 11 August 2022
p.8
Requirement Due date
within 48 hours of the use of the measure, the registered person, or a person who is authorised by the registered person to do so ("the authorised person")—
p.8
Requirement Due date
has spoken to the user about the measure; and
p.8
Requirement Due date
has signed the record to confirm it is accurate; and
p.8
Requirement Due date
within 5 days of the use of the measure, the registered person or the authorised person adds to the record confirmation that they have spoken to the child about the measure (Regulation 35 (3)(b)(i)(ii)(c))
p.8
Requirement Due date
In particular, the manager should ensure that staff involved in physical interventions are spoken to about the 11 August 2022 Inspection report for children’s home: 1263977 9 intervention. The manage should also ensure that records evidence reflective challenge to staff practice with the aim of learning and developing the staff approach. In addition, the manager or an authorised person should confirm they have spoken to the child within five days and make their views clear in children’s records.
p.8
Recommendation
The registered person should ensure that supervision includes discussions about children’s needs, to aid staff development. (‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’, page 39, paragraph 8.15)
p.9
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people, using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. Inspection report for children’s home: 1263977 10
p.9
Children’s home details
Registered provider: Care Perspectives Limited
p.10
Children’s home details
Registered provider address: 36 Frederick Street, Loughborough LE11 3BJ
p.10
Children’s home details
Responsible individual: Rodrigo Ferreira
p.10
Inspectors
Melanie Griffin, Social Care Inspector Sarah Berry, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for children’s home: 1263977 11 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.10
Inspectors
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspectors
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.11
Inspectors
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion