Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF)
Childminder in Kent
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
10 Jun 2022
- Inspectors verified
Katie Smith
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Inadequate
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Name on report verified
Childminder report
- URN verified
2634241
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2022.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentInadequate
- Quality of educationInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The childminder fails to identify risks within the setting, and as a result, children are at risk of harm. p.3
- The childminder is unable to identify all risks within the setting; children are put at risk and their health and safety is compromised. p.2
- The quality of teaching is poor and children's learning is overdirected; the childminder lacks understanding of child development. p.2
- The childminder's curriculum is weak and there is limited intent for children. p.2
- The childminder has addressed some of the previous breaches of the statutory and welfare requirements raised at the last inspection. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Wellbeing & mental health3
“As a result, this significantly impacts children's emotional well-being.” p.2Personal development2
“This negatively impacts children's personal development.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 699
- shorter than usual (typical 899)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 52, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Inadequate
p.1
The provision is inadequate
Children do not flourish. The childminder's curriculum is weak and there is limited intent for children. She has not gathered enough information on children's starting points to build a curriculum that focuses on children's individual needs and she does not support them to progress to the next steps in their education. This has an impact on the quality of education children receive.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
The childminder's routines are not embedded. Children are not aware of the routine and familiar aspects of their day. Children become upset when the routine changes. For example, children struggle with understanding when it is time to come inside from the garden. This negatively impacts children's personal development.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Children receive inconsistent messages regarding behavioural expectations. As a result, children do not understand what is expected of them and continue to misbehave. The childminder uses a 'naughty chair' and does not offer age- appropriate explanations. The specific naughty chair is also used for general activities. Young children are unable to differentiate between the two uses. This means the strategies that are used by the childminder are inappropriate for children's age and stage of development. As a result, this significantly impacts children's emotional well-being.
p.2
need to do better?
n The childminder has addressed some of the previous breaches of the statutory and welfare requirements raised at the last inspection. However, not all breaches have been addressed effectively and children's safety and well-being remain compromised. n The childminder's risk assessment is ineffective. The childminder is unable to identify all risks within the setting; children are put at risk and their health and safety is compromised. For example, young children access hand sanitiser because it is left within their reach, this, if consumed is harmful and toxic for children. n The quality of teaching is poor and children's learning is overdirected; the childminder lacks understanding of child development. The childminder does not plan and deliver activities and experiences well enough to help children learn and build on what they already know. This impacts children's learning and development. n Activities are unorganised and children have limited choices. The childminder
p.2
need to do better?
leaves the activity to get more resources and she keeps items in the reach of children that she does not want them to use; this frustrates children. They do not have clarity on what to do and are told off for things which are not their
p.2
need to do better?
10 June 2022 fault. For example, touching paint pots which are left in front of them. n Young children are given opportunities to feed themselves. However, they are not always given the appropriate cutlery to do this. For example, children are sometimes given spoons which are too large. This makes it difficult for children to control their movements to feed themselves and it hinders their independence skills. n The childminder models language appropriately; she speaks in a clear voice and comments on children's play. This helps to develop children's speech and language. n The childminder communicates with parents; she speaks to them daily and values their opinions. She provides feedback forms to help her to reflect on her practice. The childminder signposts parents who have concerns to relevant professionals to support the children further. n The childminder provides basic care for children. She washes children's hands
p.2
need to do better?
after activities and before eating. She ensures that children's noses are wiped and their faces are clean. However, children are not given the opportunity to do this for themselves. This impacts children's personal development.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Risk assessment is ineffective. The childminder fails to identify risks within the setting, and as a result, children are at risk of harm. Despite this weakness, the childminder demonstrates understanding of signs and symptoms of when children may be exposed to abuse. She knows the procedures to follow to report any child protection concerns about children in her care. She is aware of risks outside of the setting, such as strangers. The childminder keeps her premises secure.
p.3
Due date
take all reasonable steps to ensure children are not exposed to risk 08/07/2022
p.3
Due date
manage children's behaviour appropriately, ensuring children understand the expectations for their behaviour. 08/07/2022
p.3
Due date
ensure children are provided with challenging and enjoyable experiences that meet their individual needs 22/07/2022
p.4
Due date
improve interactions with children to meet their emotional needs 22/07/2022
p.4
Due date
ensure daily routines support children's play and learning opportunities. 22/07/2022
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number 2634241 Local authority Bexley Inspection number 10231737 Type of provision Childminder
p.5
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Childminder
p.5
inspection
Total number of places 5 Number of children on roll 4 Date of previous inspection 31 January 2022
p.5
Information about this early years setting
The childminder registered in 2021. She lives in Erith within the London Borough of Bexley. The childminder provides care, Monday to Friday, most times of the year.
p.5
Inspection activities
n The inspector discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the provider and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the provider. n The inspector viewed the provision and discussed the safety and suitability of the premises. n The childminder spoke to the inspector about their intentions for children's learning. n The inspector observed the quality of education being provided, indoors and outdoors, and assessed the impact that this was having on children's learning. n The inspector observed the interactions between the childminder and children. n The childminder provided the inspector with a sample of key documentation on request.
p.5
Inspection activities
10 June 2022 We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.5
Inspection activities
10 June 2022 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
Inspection activities
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspection activities
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.7
Inspection activities
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspection activities
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion