Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF)
Childminder in Birmingham
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
25 May 2022
- Inspectors verified
Anne Dyoss
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Met
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Name on report verified
Childminder report
- URN verified
EY444550
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentInadequate
- Quality of educationInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Risk assessment is not effective and the childminder does not prioritise children's safety. p.2
- The weaknesses in the childminder's education programme have a negative impact on the progress that children can make. p.2
- However, she has a weak understanding of how to use observations of children's achievements to identify what they already know and can do. p.2
- The childminder fails to challenge children in their learning. p.3
- This is also a breach of the requirements. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This is a breach of the requirements and puts children at risk should they need to receive emergency first aid while in the childminder's care. p.2
- The childminder knows that she must complete children's two-year-old progress check and provide a written copy to parents. p.2
- The childminder has a basic understanding of what babies need to learn to progress towards their development milestones. p.2
- 25 May 2022 programme is not designed to help children to gain the necessary skills they need to prepare them for their future learning. p.2
- Older children decide that they need to use scissors, however these are not sharp enough to cut with. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Behaviour3
“They generally behave well.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 981
- about usual (typical 899)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Met
p.1
The provision is inadequate
Children's welfare is compromised. Risk assessment is not effective and the childminder does not prioritise children's safety. She does not hold a valid paediatric first-aid certificate and does not always supervise children when they are eating. This puts children at risk.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Children have formed attachments with the childminder. They generally behave well. However, children do not consistently follow the childminder's guidance at mealtimes and the childminder repeatedly asks them not to stand on the chairs when they are eating. The childminder helps children to take turns with equipment. Children use their creative ideas to complete craft activities. However, the childminder provides children with a very limited selection of age-appropriate resources and activities. Although children join in a drawing activity, the childminder does not provide them with other choices of activities. Children ask to watch the television when there is nothing else available that interests them.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
The weaknesses in the childminder's education programme have a negative impact on the progress that children can make. Teaching does not ensure that children are prepared for the next stage of their learning. The childminder helps children to develop their early reading and mathematical skills. However, she does not help children to practise their physical skills. The childminder does not provide children with the appropriate cutlery to eat their evening meal and children use their fingers. This does not broaden children's experiences from home and fully promote their physical development. Children do not learn about making healthy food choices and do not benefit from daily opportunities to play and learn outdoors.
p.2
need to do better?
n The childminder does not effectively monitor the quality of service that she provides. This has a negative impact on children's experiences and their safety. She does not identify key weaknesses or demonstrate a commitment to continuing her professional development and completing mandatory training. The childminder has not maintained her understanding of the early years foundation stage. She does not take all necessary steps to minimise risks to children. The childminder has not held a valid paediatric first-aid certificate since 2018. This is a breach of the requirements and puts children at risk should they need to receive emergency first aid while in the childminder's care. The quality of the childminder's practice has significantly declined since the last inspection. n The childminder has a basic understanding of what babies need to learn to progress towards their development milestones. However, she has a poor
p.2
need to do better?
understanding of how to prioritise the learning for older children, to build on their knowledge and skills. This means that the childminder's education
p.2
need to do better?
25 May 2022 programme is not designed to help children to gain the necessary skills they need to prepare them for their future learning. n The childminder knows that she must complete children's two-year-old progress check and provide a written copy to parents. However, she has a weak understanding of how to use observations of children's achievements to identify what they already know and can do. She does not know how to build on their knowledge and skills, particularly for older children. This significantly hinders the progress that children can make. n Teaching is poor. The childminder does not effectively plan activities and learning experiences for children. She does not create a learning environment that inspires children and motivates them to play and learn. The childminder does not ensure that the available resources meet the development stage of children. When older children attend, the childminder only has toys designed for
p.2
need to do better?
babies available for them to choose from and a box of craft materials. Children are not motivated to play so they sit on the sofa and ask to watch the television. n The childminder fails to challenge children in their learning. Older children decide that they need to use scissors, however these are not sharp enough to cut with. Instead, the childminder completes the cutting for children. When children have an idea about a craft material to use, the childminder suggests an alternative. This does not challenge them to explore their own ideas and practise their physical skills. n The childminder does not prioritise children's health. Although the childminder's home is clean, children do not learn about the importance of good hygiene routines and regular handwashing. She does not provide children with nutritiously balanced meals and snacks. The childminder gives children crisps as a snack when they arrive, shortly followed by chicken nuggets and chips. This
p.3
need to do better?
does not promote children's health. She does not recognise the importance of providing children with daily opportunities for outdoor learning. This means they have very limited opportunities to be more physically active. This is also a breach of the requirements. n The childminder has established sound partnership working with parents. She has daily communication with parents to help keep them informed about their child's day.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Children's safety is compromised. The childminder fails to risk assess effectively to ensure children's welfare. She does not recognise the potential risks to children when she does not supervise them when they are eating. The childminder does not hold a valid first-aid certificate. This puts children at risk because she does not have the most up-to-date training and knowledge for administering emergency first aid. The childminder has a suitable knowledge and understanding of signs and symptoms of abuse and neglect. She knows about the local safeguarding procedures for reporting concerns about a child.
p.3
Due date
ensure that a paediatric first-aid certificate is renewed every three years and that this training meets the legal requirements 26/06/2022
p.4
Due date
improve risk assessment with particular regards to supervising children when they are eating 26/06/2022
p.4
Due date
ensure that children have daily opportunities for outdoor learning experiences 26/06/2022
p.4
Due date
improve opportunities for children to learn about good hygiene routines and about making healthy food choices 26/06/2022
p.4
Due date
complete professional development and improve knowledge of the areas of learning to develop education programmes that support children's learning well 26/06/2022
p.4
Due date
improve knowledge and systems to monitor children's progress, and to plan well for their learning. 25/07/2022
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number EY444550 Local authority Birmingham Inspection number 10116214 Type of provision Childminder
p.5
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Childminder
p.5
inspection
Total number of places 3 Number of children on roll 2 Date of previous inspection 28 January 2016
p.5
Information about this early years setting
The childminder registered in 2012. She lives in Birmingham. Her opening times are Monday to Friday, from 8am to 6.30pm, for most of the year.
p.5
Inspection activities
n This was the first routine inspection the provider received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the provider and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the provider. n The childminder and the inspector completed a learning walk together. The inspector observed teaching practices and considered the impact these have on children's learning. n The inspector interacted with children and took into account the views of parents. n The inspector sampled some of the childminder's documentation, including qualifications.
p.5
Inspection activities
We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.5
Inspection activities
25 May 2022 25 May 2022 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.5
Inspection activities
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspection activities
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.7
Inspection activities
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspection activities
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion