Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
St Andrew's CofE High School
Summary
Shaun Jarvis (lead), Matthew Newberry, Michelle Lower
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
6 Apr 2022
- Inspectors verified
Matthew Newberry, Michelle Lower, Shaun Jarvis
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
BN14 8BG
- Name on report verified
St Andrew’s Church of England High School
- URN verified
126094
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- However, her ambitious vision to provide a high-quality education for all has not been realised, and more time is needed. p.2
- Pupils are taught a broad range of subjects that are well planned and well sequenced from Year 7 to Year 11. p.2
- The headteacher’s ambitious vision for providing a high-quality education has not been realised. p.4
- A well-planned curriculum ensures that pupils are knowledgeable about many different topics and issues. p.3
- She sets high expectations for herself, staff and pupils, and has brought much-needed stability to the school. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Pupils spoken to during the inspection know that this language should not be used and want it to stop. p.2
- Leaders need to ensure that prejudiced and discriminatory language is eradicated. p.3
- Leaders need to ensure that these processes are sharper and that there is consistency in the school’s use of assessment. p.4
- Leaders need to ensure that reading is prioritised in the school. p.4
- Leaders need to ensure that the planned curriculum is implemented consistently in every subject. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Personal development2
“The personal development provision for pupils is good.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,096
- shorter than usual (typical 1552)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 55, typical 53
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 6
- Hedged sentences
- 16%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of St Andrew’s Church of England High School Sackville Road, Worthing, West Sussex BN14 8BG
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Requires improvement 5 and 6 April 2022
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
The headteacher leads St Andrew’s Church of England High School with ambition, drive and determination, seeking to bring the school’s motto, ‘aspiration for all, from all’, to life. She sets high expectations for herself, staff and pupils, and has brought much-needed stability to the school.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Many pupils feel safe at school because of the positive relationships that staff develop with them. Staff invest time in finding out about pupils’ individual circumstances. As a result, most pupils feel well supported and well cared for.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
However, some pupils feel unhappy at school. They describe the frequent use of misogynist, homophobic and, less frequently, racist language having become the norm. Pupils spoken to during the inspection know that this language should not be used and want it to stop.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Leaders are firmly committed to improving this situation and take quick, decisive action when incidents are reported to them. They have begun to tackle some of these issues. For example, staff have received training in how to respond to homophobic language. However, despite leaders’ actions, there is much more to do to eradicate the use of prejudiced and discriminatory language.
p.2
better?
The headteacher took up her post in January 2021 following a period of significant leadership instability in the school. She has brought with her a relentless commitment to bring about change. In her short space of time as headteacher, she has not shied away from taking difficult decisions. However, her ambitious vision to provide a high-quality education for all has not been realised, and more time is needed. Some of leaders’ work has been hampered by disruption to staffing that has been caused in the main, but not solely, by the COVID-19 pandemic.
p.2
better?
Pupils are taught a broad range of subjects that are well planned and well sequenced from Year 7 to Year 11. However, leaders know that what is taught is more precisely planned in some subjects than in others.
p.2
better?
Most teachers are confident in teaching the curriculum. Teachers are experts in their subjects and most explain new learning well. Pupils have regular opportunities to revisit what they have already learned to ensure that they have remembered it. This prepares them for what they will learn next. However, there are inconsistencies in how well the curriculum is taught.
p.2
better?
Some teachers skilfully check pupils’ understanding to shape their teaching so that it meets the needs of all pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). However, other teachers do not check for understanding, and pupils move on without fully understanding what they have learned. This leads to pupils having gaps in their learning. 5 and 6 April 2022
p.2
3
While there are opportunities for pupils to read, they do not read widely and often. Plans to improve reading are at an earlier stage of development. Staff have been trained to promote reading strategies and the use of key vocabulary in lessons. However, this is not consistently embedded across the school.
p.3
3
Pupils are mostly attentive and follow the school’s rules in lessons and at social times. However, there are still too many who do not make good progress because not all teachers have the same high expectations. This means that pupils’ experiences vary as they move from lesson to lesson.
p.3
3
The personal development provision for pupils is good. A well-planned curriculum ensures that pupils are knowledgeable about many different topics and issues. There are ample opportunities for pupils to learn relationships and sex education, and about finances, as well as different religions, values and beliefs. A well-thought-out careers programme ensures that all pupils receive guidance about future opportunities.
p.3
3
Governors are on the same page as leaders and are focused on the right priorities. A more rigorous approach to governance is providing challenge and support for leaders. A true partnership between governors, the local authority and the Diocese of Chichester is helping to support the school.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders and staff understand the needs of the community. They know pupils and their families well. Staff are trained very well to identify concerns. They use the school’s clear processes to report these concerns. Leaders take appropriate actions promptly. Records of concerns and the actions taken are thorough and detailed. Leaders are vigilant to the risks facing pupils and the wider community. They are not afraid to escalate their concerns to get the right support for pupils. Their close working relationships with external partners are helpful in ensuring a coordinated approach to supporting pupils.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Incidents of prejudiced and discriminatory behaviour, both direct and indirect, are frequent. Consequently, some pupils say that this type of behaviour has become the norm and they do not feel happy. Leaders need to ensure that prejudiced and discriminatory language is eradicated. The behaviour of some pupils does not meet the expectations that the school sets. This means that some pupils are negatively affected by the behaviour of others. Leaders need to ensure that all pupils, including the most vulnerable, are able to thrive. 5 and 6 April 2022
p.3
4
The curriculum is not implemented consistently across the school. This slows the progress that pupils make in their learning. The headteacher’s ambitious vision for providing a high-quality education has not been realised. Leaders need to ensure that the planned curriculum is implemented consistently in every subject. Assessment processes are not consistent in all subjects. This means that too many pupils move on in their learning with significant gaps. Leaders need to ensure that these processes are sharper and that there is consistency in the school’s use of assessment. There is not a rigorous and sequential approach to the reading strategy. As a result, pupils do not develop fluency, confidence and enjoyment in reading. Leaders need to ensure that reading is prioritised in the school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 5 and 6 April 2022
p.4
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
Date of previous inspection
5 and 6 June 2018, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The headteacher took up her post in January 2021. A new chair of the governing body took up his post in October 2021. The school was a single-sex school until September 2021, when the school became co-educational. The most recent section 48 inspection took place on 9 and 10 February 2016. Governors are aware that the next section 48 inspection is imminent. The school meets the requirements of the Baker Clause, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships. The school currently uses two registered providers of alternative education provision.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. 5 and 6 April 2022
p.5
6
In accordance with section 44(2) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement, because it is performing significantly less well than it might in all the circumstances reasonably be expected to perform.
p.6
6
This was the first routine inspection the school had received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders, and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: modern foreign languages, English, mathematics and history. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors also reviewed some other subjects, including art, science, computing and the personal, social, health and economic education programme. Inspectors met with leaders, staff, pupils and those with responsibility for governance, including the chair and three other members of the governing body. Inspectors held discussions with two registered providers of alternative education
p.6
6
provision. Inspectors observed tutor time, assembly and break- and lunchtimes. Inspectors scrutinised behaviour and attendance records. Inspectors met with a representative of the local authority and held a discussion with a representative of the Diocese of Chichester. Inspectors scrutinised governing body meeting minutes, and records of visits to the school by governors, the local authority and the Diocese of Chichester. Inspectors met with the special educational needs coordinator remotely to discuss the provision for pupils with SEND. They visited lessons to look at the support these pupils were receiving. Inspectors considered the responses to the confidential staff survey. They took account of the responses to Ofsted’s Parent View questionnaire and comments made by those who responded. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors looked at the school’s website and policies, met with leaders and spoke with pupils and staff. They
p.6
6
scrutinised school records of the safeguarding checks carried out on adults working at the school and spoke with governors. They scrutinised a selection of electronic records of child protection.
p.6
Inspection team
Shaun Jarvis, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Matthew Newberry Her Majesty’s Inspector 5 and 6 April 2022
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion