Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 18 May 2022 · published 6 Jul 2022

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Samantha Ingram

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    18 May 2022

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Samantha Ingram

  • Postcode verified

    DA14 5BU

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−38Criticalmore positive than 6% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praisewell sequencedpositiveclearconsistentsecure
Criticismweakerweaknessesrequires improvementfalling behindnot always

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings673w−40
  • Leadership132w+14
  • What needs to improve146w−43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
949
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 55, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
5
typical 2
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 71%Leadership 14%What needs to improve 15%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Anne Wood Principal Hope Community School 167 Rectory Lane Sidcup Kent DA14 5BU

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Hope Community School

Following my visit to your school on 18 May 2022, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Hope Community School

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school received a judgement of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspection.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Hope Community School

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. I discussed the ongoing impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in my evaluation.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Hope Community School

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

for governance are taking effective action in order for the school to become a

The school should take further action to:

p.1

for governance are taking effective action in order for the school to become a

 ensure that curriculum thinking is sufficiently detailed for all subjects. Leaders must identify the key knowledge pupils should learn in the wider curriculum. This must be well sequenced to build pupils’ understanding cumulatively from the early years onwards  ensure all pupils have full access to the broad and balanced curriculum offer and the timetabling of interventions minimises any loss of learning.

p.1

Context

Since the last inspection, leadership has been stable. The school is a small, one-form entry primary, with only two senior leaders – the principal and the assistant principal. The principal is retiring in September. The trust board is currently recruiting for a new headteacher.

p.2

Context

The trust has remained stable, but a new chair of the school council was appointed in September 2018.

p.2

Main findings

Since the last inspection, you and the deputy principal have put an improvement plan in place. Trustees have supported you, both with this and through a range of challenges the school has faced. While these are not all to do with COVID-19, the pandemic has further complicated matters. As a result, progress in some areas has been slower than you would have liked.

p.2

Main findings

Phonics and early reading have been key priorities. A new systematic synthetic phonics programme has recently been introduced. The teaching of phonics is consistent across Reception and key stage 1 and begins as soon as pupils start school. Pupils read decodable texts matched to the sounds they know. This helps them learn to read at the earliest opportunity. Additional daily support assists weaker readers to catch up quickly. While this programme is relatively new and needs time to fully embed, it is having a positive impact on pupils’ progress.

p.2

Main findings

Commercial schemes have been used as a starting point in some subjects. They have been further adapted to meet the needs of pupils. In computing, these plans have key knowledge identified. Small steps of learning are sequenced, to help pupils develop a deeper understanding. However, this is not the case with history and geography. While there have been some improvements, the history curriculum still does not meet the scope or ambition of the national curriculum. In history and geography, pupils are taught through a topic-based approach. Not enough thought has been given to developing subject-specific knowledge and understanding. Leaders are making learning fit a topic rather than delivering it in a logical order. As a result, pupils are not building the core subject knowledge they need. They remember some key facts, but their understanding is weaker.

p.2

Main findings

You do have clear expectations for how the curriculum should be taught. All staff are expected to help pupils recall what they have previously learned, be clear about the new knowledge they will be learning and know key vocabulary. History and geography teaching does not follow this model well enough, due to weaknesses in the planned curriculum. You have plans in place to develop the curriculum further. These changes are due to take effect from September 2022. They will also coincide with the arrival of a new headteacher.

p.2

Main findings

You are all committed to ensuring that pupils have access to an offer that increases their cultural capital. The timetabling of interventions to help pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), or those falling behind, does not always achieve this. Not all pupils with SEND are able to access the full curriculum programme. You are aware and have plans in place to adjust the timetable so this does not continue.

p.3

Additional support

You have been proactive in seeking support. Investment in the reading hub for the new phonics programme has enabled you to train staff and secure continued improvements in reading. Your school improvement partner (SIP) has supported the development of the curriculum. The trust is currently recruiting for a new SIP to assist with the next phase of curriculum development from September 2022.

p.3

Evidence

During the inspection, I met with you, the principal. I also met with the deputy principal, the special educational needs coordinator, subject leaders, the chair of the trust and those trustees responsible for governance to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection.

p.3

Evidence

In addition, I visited phonics lessons and listened to pupils read in Reception and Year 1. I scrutinised improvement plans and leaders’ self-evaluation and reviewed curriculum planning documents for computing and history. I spoke with a group of teaching assistants, visited a history lesson and looked at a sample of history books from Years 1 to 6.

p.3

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees, the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Bexley. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion