Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Social care inspection (SCCIF)

Fred Nicholson School

Inspected 25 May 2022 · published 1 Jul 2022 · URN SC038284

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    25 May 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    Ashley Hinson, Joe Cox

  • Helped and protected verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement to be good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    NR19 1JB

  • Name on report verified

    Fred Nicholson School

  • URN verified

    SC038284

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2021.

  • OverallGood
  • Helped and protectedGood
  • Leadership and managementRI to be good

70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+32Mostly positivemore positive than 35% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveenjoypositiveconsistentlyeffectivelyclearconsistentstrong
Criticismconcernscompromisedpoorrequires improvementconcernlackmissed

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1271w+32
  • What needs to improve39w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,299
about usual (typical 1609)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 43
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 74%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 24%

Full report text

Inspection report for residential special school – Fred Nicholson School 1 Fred Nicholson School Westfield Road, Dereham, Norfolk NR19 1JB Residential provision inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this residential special school

Fred Nicholson School is a day and maintained residential special school for children aged between seven and 16. The school currently has 174 children on roll, 18 of whom stay for between one and four nights each week. The residential provision is situated in the main school building and provides separate accommodation for boys and girls. The school caters for children with moderate learning difficulties, such as speech and language disorders and autism spectrum disorders.

p.1

Information about this residential special school

The inspectors only inspected the social care provision at this school.

p.1

Information about this residential special school

The residential manager has a leadership qualification and has been in post since April 2021.

p.1

Information about this residential special school

The residential provision was last inspected in June 2021.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

children and young people, taking into account

p.1

good

How well children and young people are helped and protected good

p.1

good

The effectiveness of leaders and managers requires improvement to be good

p.1

good

The residential special school provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.

p.1

good

Date of previous inspection: 29 June 2021

p.1

good

Overall judgement at last inspection: good Inspection report for residential special school – Fred Nicholson School 2

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Children enjoy and benefit from boarding at the school. They build positive relationships with enthusiastic and motivating staff and like spending time in their company. However, this inspection identified several issues with the leadership and management of the residential provision. While these issues have not negatively affected the children or the quality of the direct care that they receive, unchecked, they have the potential to do so.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

The experience of staying in residential contributes to children making progress. Children make particular progress with their independence and social skills. Some parents said that the support their children receive has led to significant changes in their children’s abilities.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Staff recognise and praise children for their achievements. The reward scheme celebrates children’s accomplishments, motivates children and raises their self- esteem.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

There are good links between the residential staff and the day school staff. This means that staff can ensure that children’s residential targets are mapped to their education, health and care plans. Managers capture and review the progress that children make. As a result, they have a good understanding of the improvements children are making against their identified targets.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Children enjoy a wide range of activities that they would not otherwise experience. Staff are creative in arranging different activities for children at the school. These include activities that support children’s learning and development.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

An independent visitor attends the residential provision regularly. The linked governor also frequently visits. Children know these people well and are excited to see and speak with them. This provides children with additional, familiar routes to express opinions or share concerns.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Feedback from families is consistently positive. Most parents report good communication with the residential staff. They value the provision and feel that the staff know their children well.

p.2

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Children feel safe and well cared for. Staff have a good understanding of risks to children and their individual needs. Staff are clear about the process of raising safeguarding concerns and know when to do so. The staff work with children to help them understand different risks and support them to understand how to stay safe. Inspection report for residential special school – Fred Nicholson School 3 Children say that bullying is not an issue in residential. Relationships between children are well managed. When children make inappropriate comments, staff challenge them. When there are disagreements or relatively low-level conflict between children, staff support them to overcome these in ways that help the children consider each other’s feelings.

p.2

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

The behaviour of children in the residential provision is good. Staff respond to children in calm and nurturing ways in line with their individual needs. Staff provide children with clear and consistent boundaries. This helps ensure that incidents end quickly and do not become more serious.

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

The safeguarding lead communicates well with external professionals. She takes an active role in attending multi-agency meetings and contributes effectively to these. Weekly internal safeguarding meetings take place. When a concern arose about a child not having an allocated social worker, the safeguarding lead clearly challenged the placing local authority. Good challenge to external professionals helps to ensure that children are provided with the services that they are entitled to.

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

There has been one allegation made against a staff member working in the day school. This was referred to the local authority designated officer. However, this was only referred after senior managers had spoken to the staff member involved in the allegation. Although managers had a rationale for doing so, this is not in line with the local authority’s safeguarding procedures and meant that the process could have been compromised.

p.3

good

The residential manager has not accessed important reports that are shared via the online recording system. This is despite being a safeguarding lead and the reports relating to children in the residential provision. During the inspection, senior managers made changes to the process and took immediate action to ensure that this is unlikely to occur again. However, while the manager attends weekly safeguarding team meetings, not accessing the records increases the potential for important information to be missed.

p.3

good

Children’s placement plans are of poor quality. Plans lack clarity and are confusing, misleading and ambiguous. Some information that should be included is not. Management monitoring and review had not identified these issues. Consequently, plans do not provide staff with a clear and accurate picture of children’s needs and how to meet these.

p.3

good

Although monitoring reports have improved, leaders and managers were not aware of issues found during this inspection. Consequently, they were unable to take effective action to address the shortfalls. In addition, management monitoring had not identified issues with the window restrictors on the residential landings. This was addressed during the inspection but should have been picked up sooner. Inspection report for residential special school – Fred Nicholson School 4 The leadership team has a strong emphasis on the well-being of staff. Staff feel well supported by managers. Records of the regular supervisions demonstrate a good level of discussion and reflection. This supports staff’s development by considering how they can best respond to children’s needs in different situations.

p.3

good

Managers provide staff with a comprehensive induction programme and appropriate probation. This ensures that new staff are given the support needed to learn the different aspects of their roles.

p.4

good

Managers ensure that staff access a broad range of training, including training that is specific to children’s needs. When managers identify new or emerging risks, they provide new learning and development opportunities. This helps to ensure that staff are supported to gain the knowledge that they require to meet the differing needs of the children. Inspection report for residential special school – Fred Nicholson School 5

p.4

special schools

The school does not meet the following national minimum standards for residential special schools:

p.5

special schools

 The school’s governing body and/or proprietor monitors the effectiveness of the leadership, management and delivery of the boarding and welfare provision in the school, and takes appropriate action where necessary. (NMS 13.1)  The school’s leadership and management consistently fulfil their responsibilities effectively so that the standards are met. (NMS 13.4)  The school produces a written placement plan, agreed as far as is practicable with the child, the child’s parents/carers and any placing authority for the child, unless the information is held elsewhere, such as in the child’s statement of special educational needs or education, health and care plan. The placement plan identifies the needs of that child that the school should meet and specifies how the school will care for the child and promote their welfare on a day-to-day basis. Where significant changes are made to the placement plan, there is appropriate

p.5

special schools

consultation. Where applicable, the plan is consistent with the care plan of the placing authority for any child placed by a local authority. The placement plan is regularly reviewed and amended as necessary to reflect significant changes in the child’s needs or progress in his or her development. Where feasible, children in the school are aware of the content of their placement plans, and confirm that the school is providing care for them that is consistent with the plans. (NMS 21.1)

p.5

Recommendation

 The registered person should ensure that when allegations arise, contact with the local authority designated officer is made before any contact is made either with the person subject to the allegation or the child and parent or carer.

p.5

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Children Act 1989 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the national minimum standards. Inspection report for residential special school – Fred Nicholson School 6

p.5

Residential special school details

Social care unique reference number: SC038284

p.6

Residential special school details

Type of school: Residential special school

p.6

Residential special school details

Email address: office@frednicholson.norfolk.sch.uk

p.6

Inspectors

Ashley Hinson, Social Care Inspector (lead) Joe Cox, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for residential special school – Fred Nicholson School 7 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

Inspectors

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

Inspectors

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Inspectors

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: http://www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion