Early years · Early years inspection (EIF)
Charlwood Pre-School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Charlwood Pre-School Committee
- Group reference verified
RP518173
- Inspection date verified
25 May 2022
- Inspectors verified
Kelly Hawkins
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
RH6 0DA
- Name on report verified
Charlwood Pre-School
- URN verified
122691
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentInadequate
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Significant weaknesses in leadership and management have a negative impact on the safety of children and put them at risk. p.2
- Therefore, the safety of children is compromised. p.2
- However, weaknesses in staff monitoring and support have a negative impact on children's ongoing learning. p.2
- There are not effective arrangements in place for the supervision of staff. p.2
- However, supervision and, therefore, coaching for staff is not effective. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 953
- about usual (typical 972)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Charlwood Pre-School Chapel Road, Charlwood, Horley, Surrey RH6 0DA
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
The provision is inadequate
Significant weaknesses in leadership and management have a negative impact on the safety of children and put them at risk. For example, staff do not show a sufficient knowledge and understanding of what they would do if there was a concern regarding a staff member's conduct or if an allegation was made against them. There is not a clear staff structure in place and it is difficult for staff and parents to fully understand who is in charge and responsible for managing the pre- school in the manager's absence.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Nonetheless, overall children are settled and confident. They are happy to come into the setting and independently choose their own play. Children learn what is expected of them and, therefore, they are polite and behave well. They learn about the importance of healthy lifestyles. For example, they talk about the importance of brushing their teeth to keep them clean. Children have opportunities to develop their physical skills. For example, they climb and balance on equipment, such as ladders. Overall, children take part in a range of activities. However, staff are not effectively supported to develop their performance, to ensure children receive consistently good learning experiences.
p.2
need to do better?
n The provider fails to ensure that staff who have regular contact with children are safe and suitable to fulfil the requirements of their roles. For example, a member of the committee is used as cover staff, working directly with children on a regular basis. They do not have the required full suitability checks, such as references, and are not known to Ofsted. Therefore, the safety of children is compromised. n Staff get to know children well and have a sound knowledge of all areas of learning. They plan activities that they know will interest children. Children remain focused in their learning opportunities. For example, they enjoy exploring what they can smell as they play with dough that has mint essence mixed in. However, weaknesses in staff monitoring and support have a negative impact on children's ongoing learning. n There are not effective arrangements in place for the supervision of staff. For
p.2
need to do better?
example, they currently only have conversations about their performance once a year. There are not appropriate supervision practices to ensure that staff have opportunities to receive routine feedback about what they do well and what they could do better. They do not have regular opportunities to discuss confidential and sensitive topics, including any changes to their ongoing suitability, such as Disclosure and Barring Service checks. n Parents speak fondly of the staff and pre-school. They feel informed and involved in their children's learning. Staff share regular photos of what children
p.2
need to do better?
25 May 2022 have enjoyed participating in. n The manager who refers to her role as setting lead, does not hold a relevant early years qualification at level 3 or above. The manager discusses that there is a second setting lead who is qualified at level 3. However, she lacks confidence in taking full responsibility for the running of the setting and knowing what is expected of her. There is currently no named deputy to take charge in the manager's absence. The management structure is not robust and clear. Therefore, staff do not understand that the joint setting lead has a management role and are not clear who to go to in the manager's absence. n Staff support children to gain a sound understanding of other people's similarities and differences from around the world. For instance, they learn about celebrations traditional to other cultures, such as Diwali. n The manager and staff attend some beneficial training. They have recently
p.2
need to do better?
learned about the different ways to support all children to develop confident communication skills. This includes using visual picture cards and sign language alongside spoken words. However, supervision and, therefore, coaching for staff is not effective. n The manager does not fully understand the changes that must be notified to Ofsted. She does not have a secure understanding of her full roles and responsibilities. As a result, she had failed to notify Ofsted of changes of chairperson, committee members and manager. They have not completed all suitability checks and are not known to Ofsted. Therefore, the safety of the children cannot be certain.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
The manager and staff have a sound knowledge and understanding of the signs to be aware of that may highlight a concern and who to contact to seek advice. However, the manager and some staff do not know what to do if there was an allegation raised against staff. Therefore, the manager has failed to ensure that safeguarding policies are well implemented and fully understood. The manager cannot fully be assured that all staff working directly with children are safe and suitable to do so. This has the potential to put children's safety at serious risk.
p.3
Due date
25 May 2022 ensure that all staff have a clear knowledge of all safeguarding policies and procedures, this includes knowing how to deal with allegations raised against staff and understanding the role of the local authority designated officer 30/06/2022
p.3
Due date
ensure all staff, including cover staff, complete all required safety and suitability checks and are safe and suitable to fulfil their roles and responsibilities 30/06/2022
p.4
Due date
put in place appropriate arrangements for the supervision of staff who have regular contact with children 30/06/2022
p.4
Due date
implement a clear and robust management structure to ensure that in the absence of the manager, the other manager and/or a named deputy is capable and qualified to take charge of the setting 30/06/2022
p.4
Due date
ensure that the manager knows their full roles and responsibilities and obtains the required qualification 30/06/2022
p.4
Due date
improve the managers understanding of what changes must be notified to Ofsted, this includes changes in chairpersons, committee members and manager. 30/06/2022
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number 122691 Local authority Surrey Inspection number 10228021 Type of provision Childcare on non-domestic premises Registers Early Years Register Day care type Sessional day care
p.5
inspection
Total number of places 24 Number of children on roll 32 Name of registered person Charlwood Pre-School Committee
p.5
reference number
Telephone number 01293 862302 Date of previous inspection 25 November 2016
p.5
Information about this early years setting
Charlwood Pre-School registered in 1983. It is located in the grounds of Charlwood Village Primary School in Horley, Surrey. The setting is open Monday to Friday from 9am until 3pm, term time only. The setting receives funding to provide free early education for children aged two, three and four years. The setting employs five members of staff, two of whom hold a relevant early years qualification at level 3.
p.5
Inspection activities
n This was the first routine inspection the provider received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the provider and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the provider. n The inspector carried out a learning walk with the manager. The inspector assessed the impact of the quality of staff interactions and the learning opportunities they provide children. n The inspector viewed the indoor and outdoor learning environments. n Written documentation was reviewed. This included safeguarding and child protection policies and procedures. n The inspector spoke to the manager, children, parents and staff at convenient times and considered their views.
p.6
Inspection activities
We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.6
Inspection activities
25 May 2022 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
Inspection activities
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspection activities
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.7
Inspection activities
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspection activities
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion