Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

London South Bank University

Inspected 28 Apr 2022 · published 29 Jun 2022 · URN 70064

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Adam Vincent (lead), Aliki Constantopoulou, Andrea Bedeau

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    28 Apr 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    Adam Vincent, Aliki Constantopoulou, Andrea Bedeau

  • Postcode verified

    SE1 0AA

  • Name on report verified

    London South Bank University

  • URN verified

    70064

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+51Positivemore positive than 50% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrongconfidenteffectivelyhigh-qualityambitiousenjoywell supportedwell prepared
Criticismrequires improvementnot consistentlyunclearnot stronglynot rigorousnot clearly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
987
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 45
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
14%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 62%About the inspection 38%

Full report text

London South Bank University 103 Borough Road, London SE1 0AA

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The quality of education and training Good

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement

p.1

What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?

Trainees enjoy the programme and are excited about their future careers as teachers. They feel well supported by the centre-based training, including in managing the demands of the course. Most also value the training and support during their school placements. That said, a few trainees would like more guidance on how to make the central training relevant to school placements in specialist settings.

p.1

What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?

Comprehensive training on safeguarding and behaviour is delivered early on in the programme. Trainees like the way in which this training is organised. They said that it helps them to feel well prepared for their school placements. Trainees also learn about adaptive teaching and how to cater effectively for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND).

p.1

What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?

The programme promotes trainees’ readiness to teach the primary phase. This includes the knowledge needed to teach the full national curriculum. Learning how to teach early reading is a key part of the course. Trainees are taught the fundamentals of systematic synthetic phonics (SSP) and how SSP enables pupils to learn to read fluently.

p.1

What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?

From the start of the course, trainees know what they will be learning and how this will develop over time. Communication is strong. This helps everyone to play their part in supporting trainees to progress smoothly through the course. In some instances, however, leaders have not ensured that all trainees receive high-quality support from the mentoring programme.

p.1

Information about this ITE provider

◼ London South Bank University provides a programme of teacher training in the primary phase. ◼ Trainees follow either the Post Graduate Certificate in Education (PGCE) route or the School Direct (salaried or non-salaried) route. Both routes lead to the award of qualified teacher status. ◼ The partnership currently has 72 trainees, the majority of whom are on the PGCE route. ◼ There are 139 schools in the partnership. The majority of these schools were judged as good or outstanding when they were last inspected by Ofsted.

p.2

Information about this inspection

◼ When London South Bank University was last inspected by Ofsted in July 2021, it was judged as requires improvement. ◼ The inspection was carried out by three of Her Majesty’s Inspectors. ◼ Inspectors met with the provider’s senior leadership team, as well as university subject leaders and link tutors. Meetings took place either in person or remotely. ◼ Inspectors met with 23 trainees. They also spoke to early career teachers. ◼ Inspectors carried out focused reviews in the following subjects: early reading, science, mathematics, history and computing. ◼ Inspectors visited eight schools in the partnership. They met with school leaders, school-based mentors and trainees. Inspectors also met remotely with school-based mentors from other partnership schools. ◼ Inspectors reviewed 23 responses to the staff survey and 17 responses to the survey for trainees. Inspectors also considered a wide range of documents, including on

p.2

Information about this inspection

curriculum planning, records of safeguarding checks and information related to the provider’s compliance with the initial teacher education (ITE) criteria.

p.2

better?

The partnership has high aspirations for trainees. The ITE curriculum is designed to support trainees in becoming knowledgeable and confident teachers in the primary phase. Masters-level modules, for instance in inclusion and SEND, complement the core ITE curriculum offer. These are popular and enable trainees to deepen their understanding further.

p.3

better?

Leaders review the effectiveness of the programme regularly. They make sure that the requirements of the core content framework are covered in full. Partnership leaders and tutors regularly check the progress that trainees are making, including during their school placements. If a trainee needs extra support, leaders have strategies in place to ensure that individualised help is provided. Leaders also identify accurately aspects of the programme that need further development. Currently, leaders are prioritising strengthening their approach to quality assurance.

p.3

better?

Centrally delivered training is typically ambitious, particularly in English, mathematics and science. Trainees are supported to develop a strong understanding of pedagogy and curriculum design. They learn about the latest research and how this can be used to help pupils know more and remember more in different subjects. Leaders ensure that the programme is delivered by experts, including visiting speakers with experience in educational research. However, in a small number of the foundation subjects, the aims and content of the centre-based training have not been considered as carefully. As a result, trainees’ knowledge of these subjects and how to teach them is not promoted as strongly as it is in others.

p.3

better?

Leaders structure the centre-based and school-based training effectively. They make sure that the different elements work in tandem to increase trainees’ knowledge and confidence. For example, right from the start of the course, trainees learn about how to create a calm classroom environment. This helps to ensure that trainees feel confident and ready to manage behaviour in their school placements. In a few instances, however, the delivery of the ITE curriculum does not bear in mind the needs of trainees in specialist settings. Sometimes, these trainees feel unsure how to apply in their placement schools what they have learned.

p.3

better?

Ensuring that trainees are ready to teach early reading is prioritised. Trainees learn how to support pupils who are at an early stage of reading and those who have fallen behind. Leaders involve partnership schools closely in this work. This helps to ensure that trainees get plenty of practice in applying their knowledge of early reading and SSP.

p.3

better?

School-based mentors, including those who are new to the role, receive clear information on their roles. Guidance and documentation have been streamlined. Partnership schools and trainees appreciate these changes, and in particular how leaders make it straightforward to understand the requirements of the course. Mentors receive helpful training, including on how to give trainees feedback. However, leaders’ quality assurance of the mentoring programme is still developing. Some school-based support and guidance do not match up closely with what trainees learn at the centre. When this happens, it can be confusing for trainees.

p.3

(Information for the provider and appropriate authority)

◼ Leaders’ quality assurance of the mentoring programme, while improving, is not consistently rigorous. On occasions, some school-based guidance leaves trainees unsure of how to develop their practice. This happens when advice to trainees does not align closely with what they have learned at the centre. Leaders should make sure that all school-based support makes a consistently strong contribution to trainees’ progression through the ITE curriculum. ◼ Leaders have not considered fully how to make all parts of the curriculum relevant to trainees who undertake placements in specialist settings. A few trainees feel unclear about how to apply important learning. Leaders have started to address this, but further refinements to the curriculum are needed. Leaders should continue their work to ensure that all trainees feel confident in using and adapting course content meaningfully. ◼ While most of the centre-based training is carefully planned, the curriculum for a small

p.4

(Information for the provider and appropriate authority)

number of foundation subjects is not as clearly defined. This means that trainees’ knowledge of how to teach these subjects is not deepened fully over the course of the programme. Leaders should revisit the aims and content of the centre-based training in these subjects and ensure that all curriculum content is planned and sequenced equally well.

p.4

compliance criteria?

◼ The partnership meets the Department for Education’s statutory compliance criteria.

p.4

ITE provider details

Unique reference number 70064 Inspection number 10230610

p.5

ITE provider details

This inspection was carried out by Her Majesty’s Inspectors (HMI) in accordance with the ‘Initial teacher education inspection framework and handbook’. This framework and handbook set out the statutory basis and framework for initial teacher education (ITE) inspections in England from September 2020.

p.5

ITE provider details

Type of ITE provider Higher education institution Phases provided Primary Date of previous inspection 28 June to 1 July 2021

p.5

Inspection team

Adam Vincent, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector Andrea Bedeau Her Majesty’s Inspector Aliki Constantopoulou Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.5

Annex: Placement schools

Inspectors visited the following schools as part of this inspection:

p.6

Name URN ITE phase(s)

George Carey Church of England Primary School 136431 Primary Heathbrook Primary School 100566 Primary Invicta Primary School 100134 Primary Park House School 134145 Primary St Peter and St Paul Catholic Primary School 100447 Primary Stockwell Primary School 100582 Primary West Ham Church Primary School 102765 Primary Purley Oaks Primary School 101733 Primary guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk

p.6

Name URN ITE phase(s)

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-

p.7

Name URN ITE phase(s)

government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

Name URN ITE phase(s)

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Name URN ITE phase(s)

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion