Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (EIF)

Yarnton Preschool

Inspected 24 May 2022 · published 28 Jun 2022 · URN 133975

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Yarnton Playgroup Committee

  • Group reference verified

    RP904647

  • Inspection date verified

    24 May 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    Tracy Bartholomew

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    OX5 1LW

  • Name on report verified

    Yarnton Preschool

  • URN verified

    133975

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentInadequate
  • Quality of educationInadequate

5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−58Criticalmore positive than 18% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveconsistentlyenjoyambitiousmake good progresspositivepositivelycaring
Criticismfailweaknessesat riskweakconcernspoorfailedinconsistent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings868w−74
  • Safeguarding324w−15

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,156
about usual (typical 972)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 50, typical 51
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
2
typical 1
Hedged sentences
30%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 51%Safeguarding 19%About the inspection 29%

Full report text

Inspection of Yarnton Preschool Rutten Lane, Yarnton, Kidlington, Oxfordshire OX5 1LW

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good

p.1

The provision is inadequate

Weaknesses in safeguarding practice means that children's safety and well-being are put at risk. Furthermore, although children enter the pre-school happily, they are not all offered the support and teaching they need. This means some children do not make the progress they are capable of. Leaders and staff fail to provide a curriculum that meets all children's learning needs, particularly those who are already not making expected progress. Teaching is inconsistent and at times is weak. Staff do not provide adequate support to all children. For example, at times, some children are not encouraged to join in with group activities and are ignored. This happens despite children putting up their hands or calling out the correct answers to questions staff ask during group activities.

p.2

The provision is inadequate

Not all children benefit from purposeful interaction or play experiences to support their identified next steps in learning. For instance, some children wander around and drift between activities, even though they are identified as needing support in their social skills and engagement in activities. Staff fail to engage children for long periods of time. This means these children are left to their own devices and do not receive the support they need.

p.2

The provision is inadequate

Most children behave well. However, some children show a lack of respect for others. For example, they take toys off other children, resulting in others shying away and showing signs of not feeling safe. Despite this, children have access to some activities that engage their interest and support their self-initiated learning. For example, children explore with blocks and guttering tubes in the garden and use different media and materials.

p.2

need to do better?

n Staff lack knowledge and understanding of their safeguarding responsibilities. Although all staff have had safeguarding training, some do not know how to identify signs that a child may be at risk, including from extreme views. Furthermore, some staff, including the designated safeguarding lead (DSL) staff member, have a poor understanding of what to do if they have concerns about staff or children. This compromises children's welfare. n Staff have a weak understanding of the curriculum learning intentions. Some staff state they have not received much information about the curriculum or the planning for children's learning and development. This means that they are not able to implement the learning intentions consistently, to help children gain the skills they need for their future learning. For instance, the manager identifies that children need to develop independence. However, at times, some staff

p.2

need to do better?

quickly step in and do things for children, such as help with clothing and shoes. This does not provide effective teaching and support to children.

p.2

need to do better?

24 May 2022 n The quality of teaching is inconsistent. Some children receive little interaction or support and are left to amuse themselves and play alone. Some children stand and watch other children and do not engage in purposeful or meaningful learning activities. Staff fail to support these children's next steps in learning, to ensure children make progress in their development. n At times, staff use opportunities such as singing and storytelling to help promote children's communication and language. However, not all children are involved in these focused times. There are times when some staff support children well. Staff involve children in some focused activities to help them learn new skills. For instance, some children develop their physical skills as they dress dolls and climb on climbing frames. n Leaders offer staff a half-termly supervision and staff comment that the manager supports them well. However, these meetings fail to identify

p.2

need to do better?

weaknesses in staff practice and their teaching. Leaders do not identify areas where staff need support, to help them develop their skills and knowledge. They fail to ensure that staff provide effective teaching to support children's learning. Leaders fail to evaluate the quality of the provision to address weaknesses, including the weak procedures to monitor children's progress. n Children's personal, social and emotional development is significantly compromised by staff's poor behaviour management. Staff do not give children consistent messages to support their understanding about appropriate behaviour. During the inspection, children were seen to be pushed and have toys taken off them by other children. Furthermore, some children threw items, such as china cups, which posed a risk to others' safety. In addition, some children's behaviours intimidated other children. This resulted in some children

p.3

need to do better?

cowering from other children and not feeling safe. Staff failed to intervene, to help children understand the consequences of their actions on others and ensure other children felt safe. Despite these weaknesses, some children do use positive manners as they say please and thank you when offered snacks and drinks. n Partnerships with parents and other professionals involved in children's welfare are constructive. Parents comment positively on the pre-school stay and play sessions and how caring the staff are towards their children. n Children play in a clean environment. They benefit from healthy lifestyle practices, such as washing their hands before mealtimes. All children enjoy daily outdoor experiences in the enclosed garden area. They benefit from fresh air and enjoy being physically active.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders, managers and staff fail to safeguard children, putting children's welfare at risk. Not all staff have a secure understanding of child protection procedures. Some are not aware of the referral systems to follow if they have a concern about a child's welfare or about another staff member's behaviours. Although leaders have implemented safeguarding policies and procedure, they have failed to ensure staff and the DSL know and understand these, and implement procedures. As a result,

p.3

Safeguarding

24 May 2022 there are weaknesses in staff's knowledge and understanding of effective safeguarding practice and procedures. Leaders follow appropriate recruitment processes. They check staff's suitability to work with children, such as completing Disclosure and Barring Service checks.

p.3

Due date

train all staff to understand the safeguarding policy and procedures, and ensure they know how to recognise, respond and promptly refer concerns about staff behaviours 24/06/2022

p.4

Due date

improve safeguarding practice, to ensure any safeguarding concerns about a child or in the event of an allegation being made against a member of staff, are notified to local statutory children's services agencies without delay, in line with the local safeguarding partners procedures 24/06/2022

p.4

Due date

ensure staff provide appropriate and consistent behaviour strategies to all children, with specific regards to ensuring children's behaviour is managed suitably, to help children to feel safe and understand how to manage their own feelings and behaviour 24/06/2022

p.4

Due date

ensure all managers and staff have effective support, supervision and coaching, so that they have a secure understanding of their roles and responsibilities, including how to promote the interests of children 24/06/2022

p.4

Due date

create a curriculum that has clear intentions for what children need to learn, and ensure staff know and understand this, so that they provide effective teaching in line with this 24/06/2022

p.4

Due date

24 May 2022 ensure the curriculum is ambitious for all children and tailored to their needs, and provides good quality and challenging learning experiences, to help them make good progress consistently. 24/06/2022

p.4

Setting details

Unique reference number 133975 Local authority Oxfordshire Inspection number 10242972 Type of provision Childcare on non-domestic premises

p.6

Registers

Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Sessional day care

p.6

inspection

Total number of places 28 Number of children on roll 46 Name of registered person Yarnton Playgroup Committee

p.6

reference number

Telephone number 0749898538 Date of previous inspection 6 September 2018

p.6

Information about this early years setting

Yarnton Preschool registered in 1979 and is located in the village of Yarnton, Oxfordshire. The pre-school is open each weekday during term time, from 8.45am until 2.45pm. There are eight members of staff who work with the children. Of these, three staff have appropriate early years qualifications at level 3 and two staff hold qualifications at level 2. The pre-school receives funding to provide free early education for children aged two, three and four years.

p.6

Inspection activities

n This was the first routine inspection the provider received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the provider and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the provider. n The manager explained the pre-school curriculum during a learning walk with the inspector. n The manager and the inspector completed a joint observation of an activity together and discussed the quality of teaching and learning afterwards. n Children spoke to the inspector about the activities they took part in. n A number of parents provided feedback about the nursery through discussions with the inspector. n The inspection was carried out following the risk assessment process.

p.7

Inspection activities

We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.7

Inspection activities

24 May 2022 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

Inspection activities

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

Inspection activities

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk

p.8

Inspection activities

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

Inspection activities

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion