Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
The Sky Academy
Summary
Stephen McShane (lead), Andrew Buckton
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
5 May 2022
- Inspectors verified
Andrew Buckton, Stephen McShane
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Requires improvement
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Postcode verified
TA2 7HW
- Name on report verified
The Sky Academy
- URN verified
148378
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentRequires improvement
- Quality of educationInadequate
3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- In too many lessons, pupils’ behaviour and attitudes to learning are poor. p.4
- Staff do not consistently challenge low-level disruption and pupils’ lack of engagement in lessons. p.2
- Although new leaders have started to tackle the very significant weaknesses of Sky Academy, it is too early to see any impact. p.2
- There remain significant inconsistencies between the education provided for pupils in the lower and upper schools and between classes. p.2
- They frequently fail to take into account pupils’ education, health and care plans (EHC plans). p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- However, these changes have yet to ensure that pupils develop the skills and knowledge they need to succeed. p.2
- Leaders and those responsible for governance must ensure that the current changes lead to significant and 4 and 5 May 2022 p.3
- They must ensure that staff are well trained and supported to deliver the curriculum. p.4
- Staff are well trained and are clear about what they must do if they are concerned. p.3
- Leaders need to ensure that identified needs are clearly understood and the provision to meet these needs is consistently in place and monitored to ensure that pupils are making progress. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance19
“Leaders need to design ambitious and well-sequenced subject curriculums across the school.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,181
- shorter than usual (typical 1552)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 57, typical 53
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 6
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of The Sky Academy Pickeridge Close, Taunton, Somerset TA2 7HW
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Inadequate Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected 4 and 5 May 2022
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils do not receive an acceptable standard of education. Although new leaders have started to tackle the very significant weaknesses of Sky Academy, it is too early to see any impact. Leaders have recently clarified the structure of the curriculum. They have changed the organisation of the upper school. However, these changes have yet to ensure that pupils develop the skills and knowledge they need to succeed. Pupils’ special educational needs and/or disabilities are not being met.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Too many pupils do not engage in lessons. Some behave very poorly. Leaders and staff say behaviour is now better than it was. However, expectations remain low. Staff do not consistently challenge low-level disruption and pupils’ lack of engagement in lessons. This impacts negatively on pupils’ learning. On occasions, it means that pupils’ behaviour gets worse. They become aggressive and disrupt the learning of others. Pupils’ attendance has been consistently low over a period of time.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Most pupils are happy and feel that staff understand them. They feel safe and they appreciate the activities they do. Staff take bullying seriously. Pupils feel that any problems will be sorted out.
p.2
better?
Current leaders recognised that the curriculum in place, particularly in the upper school, did not meet pupils’ needs. Over time, pupils have not built up their knowledge and skills well enough. The subject curriculums, particularly in English and mathematics, are not adapted sufficiently to meet the needs of pupils. There remain significant inconsistencies between the education provided for pupils in the lower and upper schools and between classes. There is a lack of clear approaches throughout the school to develop, for example, pupils’ reading, speaking and listening and writing. This means that pupils do not systematically develop the basic skills they need for the next stage of their education or employment. Leaders have made changes to the curriculum, but it is very early days.
p.2
better?
Some teachers do not have the subject or teaching knowledge they need. They do not ensure that classrooms, equipment and resources support pupils to learn the intended curriculum. Teachers do not use assessment effectively so that they build on what pupils know already. They frequently fail to take into account pupils’ education, health and care plans (EHC plans).
p.2
better?
Staff are clear that there have been significant changes at Sky Academy recently. They say that before, staff’s morale was very low, the school was ‘broken’ and behaviour was ‘out of control’. Staff are positive about the new leadership team. They are now working as a team who want to do the best for pupils.
p.2
better?
While these changes are positive, pupils are still not learning well enough. Their needs are not met. Many of the leaders are very new. They have not had time to 4 and 5 May 2022
p.2
3
put in place the improvements needed or to check the impact of recent changes. Those responsible for governance were slow to stop the decline of the school. They still do not have the necessary structures or capacity to ensure that the recent improvements are sustained.
p.3
3
There are some stronger curriculum areas. In subjects such as physical education (PE), pupils achieve well because teachers provide a well-structured curriculum that matches the needs of pupils.
p.3
3
Current leaders have taken steps to improve behaviour. They have appointed specialist staff and check behaviour much more carefully. However, expectations and approaches across the school are unclear. This means that staff do not deal with poor behaviour and lack of engagement consistently. The school does not support pupils with challenging behaviour effectively. Attendance has been very low for some considerable time. Systems to challenge and support families are now in place, but the impact has yet to be seen.
p.3
3
Pupils say they like the school. They recognise the care that staff give them. There are a wide variety of activities available to engage pupils. Staff, for example, use outdoor education and forest school to build teamwork and resilience. There is a clear careers programme in place. The school meets the requirements of the Baker Clause, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders have placed a high priority on strengthening the safeguarding practice in the school. Staff are well trained and are clear about what they must do if they are concerned. Individual cases are closely monitored by staff and actions are followed up. Leaders work closely with external agencies when required.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders know about potential safeguarding risks. They make sure these are covered in the curriculum, assemblies or targeted events.
p.3
Safeguarding
The school has appropriate systems for checking and vetting new members of staff.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Over time, those responsible for governance have not held leaders to account for the quality of education provided by the school. This means that pupils are not receiving an acceptable standard of education. Leaders and those responsible for governance must ensure that the current changes lead to significant and 4 and 5 May 2022
p.3
4
sustained improvements in the quality of education, behaviour and attendance for all pupils. Leaders have not ensured there is a well-sequenced curriculum in place. Pupils do not gain the knowledge and skills they need across all subjects. Leaders need to design ambitious and well-sequenced subject curriculums across the school. They must ensure that staff are well trained and supported to deliver the curriculum. Staff do not use the information in pupils’ EHC plans well enough. This means that pupils’ needs are not met. Leaders need to ensure that identified needs are clearly understood and the provision to meet these needs is consistently in place and monitored to ensure that pupils are making progress. In too many lessons, pupils’ behaviour and attitudes to learning are poor. There are many times when some pupils’ behaviour disrupts the learning of others. As a result, pupils do not make the progress of which they are capable. Leaders must
p.4
4
improve staff’s approach to behaviour management so that behaviour is consistently good. Too many pupils do not attend school regularly enough. Urgent action is required to reduce the level of absence and to increase the amount of time pupils attend school. Having considered the evidence, I strongly recommend that leaders and those responsible for governance do not seek to appoint early career teachers.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 4 and 5 May 2022
p.4
School details
School category Academy special converter
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected
p.5
Information about this school
All pupils who attend this school have an EHC plan. Sky Academy is a special school for pupils with emotional, social and mental health difficulties. Many pupils have communication and interaction needs. At the time of the inspection, there were no pupils living in the boarding accommodation. In April 2021, Sky College converted to academy status. It is now part of LEARN@ multi-academy trust. The current headteacher was appointed as the interim headteacher in January 2022. Her appointment as the substantive headteacher was confirmed a week before the inspection. Some leaders are still interim, and several middle leaders are new to their roles. The school currently uses five alternative providers.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. 4 and 5 May 2022
p.5
6
In accordance with section 44(1) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires special measures because it is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the persons responsible for leading, managing or governing the school are not demonstrating the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school.
p.6
6
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors met with the interim chair of the academy council, senior leaders, staff and pupils. Inspectors carried out deep dives in the following subjects: English, mathematics, PE and personal, social and health education. They met with subject leaders, visited lessons, talked to pupils and teachers and looked at pupils’ work. Inspectors looked at the policies and procedures used to keep pupils safe. They also reviewed the checks carried out by leaders on the suitability of adults who work in the school. Inspectors considered the free-text responses to the online survey, Ofsted Parent View. They also considered responses to the staff survey.
p.6
Inspection team
Stephen McShane, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Andrew Buckton Ofsted Inspector 4 and 5 May 2022
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion