Social care · Social care inspection (SCCIF)
The Wellington Academy
Summary
Sharron Escott (lead), David Kidner
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
20 May 2022
- Inspectors verified
David Kidner, Sharron Escott
- Helped and protected verified
Requires improvement to be good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
SP11 9RR
- Name on report verified
The Wellington Academy
- URN verified
SC459408
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.
- OverallGood
- Helped and protectedRI to be good
- Leadership and managementGood
70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Leaders and managers’ prompt oversight of health and safety concerns, specifically fire safety, requires improvement. p.3
- Delays in repairing the faulty doors had the potential to place boarders, staff and visitors at risk. p.3
- Weaknesses identified at this inspection relate to the effectiveness of leaders and managers’ oversight of some records. p.4
- Weaknesses in records include fire safety, risk assessments and staff supervision. p.4
- To date, these weaknesses have not had a significant impact on the boarders, but have the potential to do so if not addressed. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The provider should continue to review the need and purpose of using surveillance cameras inside the boarding accommodation. p.5
- The provider should ensure that all boarding staff receive regular reflective supervision. p.5
- The provider should continue to review the quality of food provided to boarders. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Safeguarding4
“Safeguarding concerns are managed well.” p.3Teaching & assessment4
“Weaknesses in records include fire safety, risk assessments and staff supervision.” p.4Behaviour2
“Behaviour is well managed.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,229
- shorter than usual (typical 1609)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 43
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report for boarding school: The Wellington Academy 1 The Wellington Academy
p.1
Tidworth Road, Ludgershall, Wiltshire SP11 9RR
p.1
Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this boarding school
The Wellington Academy is a state day and boarding school for children and young people aged 11 to 19 years. The Wellington Academy is part of the Royal Wootton Bassett Academy Trust.
p.1
Information about this boarding school
The Wellington Academy provides boarding for up to 100 children and young people. At the time of inspection, there were 38 children and young people boarding.
p.1
Information about this boarding school
Boarding accommodation is purpose-built and is on the academy’s campus. It provides accommodation for boys and girls in two separate inter-joining houses.
p.1
Information about this boarding school
The inspector only inspected the social care provision at this school.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
good
How well children and young people are helped and protected requires improvement to be good
p.1
good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers good
p.1
good
The boarding school provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.
p.1
good
Overall judgement at last inspection: outstanding
p.1
good
Date of last inspection: 23 January 2018 Inspection report for boarding school: The Wellington Academy 2
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Boarders benefit from boarding, both academically and socially. Boarders say that since being at this school their confidence has grown, they have learned new skills and feel well prepared for moving to university and adulthood. Boarders’ attendance and school and academic achievements exceed that of day pupils.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
The quality of care and support that the boarders receive is good. House parents skilfully build positive relationships with the boarders and, as a result, they know them well. Boarders say that if they have any worries or concerns, they feel able to speak to any of the boarding staff.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Boarders are unanimous in their views that they thoroughly enjoy their boarding experience. They say that it feels like ‘home from home’. They feel respected and listened to. Boarders found it difficult to identify any areas that could improve their boarding experience.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
An impressive outcome of boarding is the secure friendships that boarders make. Boarders say that they have made ‘friends for life’ and they stay in touch with them during the holidays. Boarders enjoy having the option to invite friends who do not board to spend the evening with them, stay for dinner and have sleepovers. These positive opportunities help relationships to flourish.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Boarders enjoy a wide range of activities both on site and in the local community. This helps their health, well-being and social skills. They say that they look forward to the weekend activities and that day trips out, such as go-karting, are fun.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Boarders have a good understanding of each other’s diverse cultural needs. They say that their cultural and religious needs are met, and they enjoy meeting and getting to know children and young people from other cultures and religions. Inspectors noted very positive interactions and relationships between boarders. Despite this positive outcome, the boarders’ induction into boarding does not include informing them about how their religious and cultural needs will be met.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Leaders and managers ensure that the health needs of the boarders are clearly understood and met. The management of medicines is effective.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Generally, the boarding accommodation is homely and welcoming. Boarders make good use of the communal areas. However, some areas including the corridors where the bedrooms are located, and bathing facilities, are looking tired and worn. This detracts from the homely environment that boarding staff have created in other areas.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Generally, boarders enjoy the meals that are provided. They have access to snacks in addition to mealtimes. Some boarders say that there are inconsistencies in the Inspection report for boarding school: The Wellington Academy 3 quality of the food that is provided. Boarders who attend the food committee have shared their concerns with the boarding staff. Appropriate action is being taken to address the boarders’ concerns.
p.2
improvement to be good
Leaders and managers’ prompt oversight of health and safety concerns, specifically fire safety, requires improvement. Leaders and managers took too long to rectify faulty fire evacuation doors. While these doors were working properly during the inspection, health and safety records show that they had been reported faulty for nine consecutive weeks before being fixed. Delays in repairing the faulty doors had the potential to place boarders, staff and visitors at risk. Fire evacuation records do not confirm that all boarders and staff have taken part in drills or attended fire awareness training.
p.3
improvement to be good
Staff manage risk effectively. However, the quality of written risk assessments does not support direct practice well enough. These documents are not specific enough about the current risks for all boarders.
p.3
improvement to be good
Safeguarding concerns are managed well. Leaders and managers ensure that they maintain effective links with safeguarding agencies. All potential safeguarding concerns are reviewed by the school’s safeguarding team, which follows safeguarding procedures effectively. Boarders have a clear understanding of how to keep themselves and others safe.
p.3
improvement to be good
Behaviour is well managed. There have been no reported incidents of the use of physical intervention, bullying or theft. Boarders show care and respect for one another. Boarders say that when house rules are broken, consequences are fair. However, consequences used are not always restorative, which can limit the opportunity for learning.
p.3
improvement to be good
Leaders and managers ensure that there are effective recruitment and selection processes in place that safeguard children.
p.3
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Since the last inspection, a new headteacher has been appointed. The head of boarding has been in their role since the last inspection and understands the benefits of boarding life. Together, they are committed to providing good-quality boarding provision. Boarding is seen as an integral part of the school. Senior leaders and managers are motivated and ambitious to learn from inspection and monitoring activities to drive improvement.
p.3
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Leaders and managers are very visible, and their accessible approach is appreciated by the boarding staff. The boarding staff team is consistent and stable. Staff members say that they feel very well led and managed. Boarding staff enjoy working Inspection report for boarding school: The Wellington Academy 4 with the boarders. One member of staff summed this up by telling the inspector, ‘The boarding house runs well. Members of staff work together to ensure that the boarders are the focus of everything we do.’ Other staff echoed this feedback. The inspector saw this happening in practice. Senior leaders and managers have established an inclusive culture. Communication and information-sharing is good and means that boarding and education staff work well together. This cohesive approach has resulted in a supportive and open culture and means that the school values are applied across all aspects of boarding and
p.3
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Weaknesses identified at this inspection relate to the effectiveness of leaders and managers’ oversight of some records. Weaknesses in records include fire safety, risk assessments and staff supervision. To date, these weaknesses have not had a significant impact on the boarders, but have the potential to do so if not addressed.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
All boarding staff have completed basic mandatory training that enables them to meet the needs of boarders. Senior house parents are qualified to undertake their role effectively. However, opportunities for boarding staff to improve their professional development have not yet been considered, for example obtaining additional qualifications relating to the care and support of children.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Generally, the boarding accommodation is homely and welcoming. However, leaders and managers have not prioritised or scheduled an ongoing maintenance programme. For example, some corridors and bathrooms are looking tired and worn, which undermines a homely environment. Inspection report for boarding school: The Wellington Academy 5
p.4
schools
The school does not meet the following national minimum standards for boarding schools:
p.5
schools
The school complies with the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005. (NMS 7.1) The issues specified in Appendix 3 are monitored, and action is taken to improve outcomes for children as appropriate. (NMS 13.9)
p.5
Recommendations
The provider should continue to review the need and purpose of using surveillance cameras inside the boarding accommodation. The provider should ensure that all boarding staff receive regular reflective supervision. The provider should continue to review the quality of food provided to boarders.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’. This inspection was carried out under the Children Act 1989 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the national minimum standards. Inspection report for boarding school: The Wellington Academy 6
p.5
Boarding school details
Social care unique reference number: SC459408
p.6
Boarding school details
Headteacher/teacher in charge: Steven Paddock
p.6
Boarding school details
Email address: stevenpaddock@thewellingtonacademy.org.uk
p.6
Inspectors
Sharron Escott, Social Care Inspector David Kidner, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for boarding school: The Wellington Academy 7 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
Inspectors
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspectors
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspectors
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion