Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Charmouth Primary School

Inspected 5 May 2022 · published 22 Jun 2022 · URN 113662

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Stewart Gale (lead), Bradley Murray

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    5 May 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    Bradley Murray, Stewart Gale

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Early years verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Requires improvement

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    DT6 6LR

  • Name on report verified

    Charmouth Primary School

  • URN verified

    113662

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
  • Early yearsRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentRequires improvement
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−16Mixedmore positive than 9% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoypositivestrongconfidentconsistentlyeffectiveambitiouswell prepared
Criticismweaknesseslacknot good enoughnot alwaysnot consistentlypoornot high expectationsconcerns

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1140w−18
  • Safeguarding85w+9
  • What needs to improve35w—

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,218
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 56
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
5
typical 5
Hedged sentences
20%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 60%Safeguarding 4%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 33%

Full report text

Inspection of Charmouth Primary School Lower Sea Lane, Charmouth, Bridport, Dorset DT6 6LR

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Requires improvement 4 and 5 May 2022

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils do not benefit from a coherent curriculum. As a result, they often find it difficult to acquire the necessary knowledge to be well prepared for the next stage in their education, including in the early years foundation stage (EYFS). Pupils have gaps in their knowledge or sometimes struggle to connect what they know to new or different situations. Pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), are not consistently learning as well as they should.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Teachers do not always have high enough expectations of pupils in lessons. Consequently, some pupils have developed poor attitudes to learning. Pupils are not routinely motivated to do their best. This reduces the quality of work they often produce. Nevertheless, pupils enjoy coming to school. They learn through a range of different activities, such as using the beach in history lessons.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy harmonious relationships with each other and adults. This helps to create a positive feel at school. Pupils feel safe. They say that bullying is rare. Pupils are confident that adults tackle any bullying, if it happens. Parents hold very differing views about the school. As a result, leaders are taking steps to improve communication and relationships with all parents.

p.2

better?

Since the previous inspection, senior leaders have struggled to gain the momentum needed towards becoming a good school. Their intentions have been interrupted by the pandemic, but other factors have also played a critical role. For example, for too long, senior leaders and governors lacked the necessary challenge and rigour in holding teachers to account. This led to an overly positive self-evaluation and unidentified weaknesses which leaders are now having to address. However, following the involvement of the local authority, the appointment of a supporting external headteacher, and some recent appointments to the governing body, the school is refocused and energised. Leaders are taking the right steps and have got the school ‘back on track’.

p.2

better?

Staff have confidence in the school’s leadership. Leaders, including governors, are mindful to help staff manage their day-to-day workload. Staff are positive and feel well supported to continue making the improvements that this school still needs.

p.2

better?

Senior leaders and those responsible for SEND did not previously have the right systems and processes to ensure that pupils consistently got the timely help they needed. This was a failing that went undetected for too long. However, senior leaders and governors are now taking effective action to ensure that the right staff, who have the capacity to complete referrals, assessments and diagnoses are securing the necessary improvements. Pupils are being identified, referred and supported appropriately through a range of internal and external services. This is a much-improved picture, although there are still some pupils whose individual plans 4 and 5 May 2022

p.2

3

are not good enough. Some support plans lack the necessary precision or detail to ensure pupils can make the best possible progress.

p.3

3

The school’s curriculum is not planned and sequenced well enough, including for children in the EYFS. Some pupils find it difficult to learn new knowledge or apply this to different situations. Leaders do not ensure that individual subject knowledge is broken into small and logical steps to help pupils deepen their knowledge and further their understanding. This holds pupils back and sometimes leads to confusion, including in the core subjects, such as mathematics and science. The weaknesses in the curriculum model and its implementation prevent pupils from being consistently ready for the next curricular challenges they face.

p.3

3

Leaders ensure that the school has an appropriate early reading and phonics programme in place. This is suitably ambitious. Most pupils have a book that matches their phonics knowledge. However, teachers do not implement the scheme with fidelity, including how they assess pupils. Assessments are not completed in a timely or thorough manner. This means the needs of some pupils are not spotted or met well enough. The organisation of the daily phonics sessions prevents some of those who have fallen behind from catching up quickly, including a few pupils with SEND. This is because learning is not always matched closely to all pupils’ needs. However, reading is widely celebrated and promoted. For example, pupils enjoy reading for different reasons and pleasure. They like hearing stories and using the library during the school day.

p.3

3

Pupils are kind, tolerant and respectful. They enjoy learning about different cultures and how to make the world a better place. For example, they talk passionately about key historical figures and events from the civil rights movement in the United States. Pupils show a great understanding of the different kinds of prejudice that exist and how these cause harm. However, they lack knowledge of different religions, which is a barrier to their understanding of life in modern Britain and the world beyond.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders, including governors, fully understand their safeguarding responsibilities. As a result, they ensure that safeguarding procedures, including staff training, pre- employment checks and arrangements for reporting concerns are implemented appropriately. Staff are tenacious in undertaking their safeguarding duties to keep pupils safe.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders ensure that pupils know how to stay safe. This includes teaching about the school’s local context, such as beach safety, and the process for making emergency contact with the coast guard. 4 and 5 May 2022

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The early reading and phonics programme is not implemented well enough, including the use of assessment. As a result, some pupils do not get off to a strong start in reading. Leaders must ensure that the phonics programme is implemented effectively so that all pupils can quickly become fluent and confident readers.  The curriculum is not planned and sequenced well enough, including in the EYFS. This leads to confused or disconnected knowledge for some pupils. Leaders must make sure that the curriculum is designed well to enable pupils to acquire deep knowledge in each subject.  Leaders’ recent actions have led to some vital but early improvements for pupils with SEND. Previous weaknesses mean that the school is still catching up. The identification of pupils’ needs and the effectiveness of targeted support is still not good enough. Leaders must continue to implement strong processes and systems so that all pupils with SEND are swiftly identified and get the support they need,

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

as quickly as possible.  Teachers do not have consistently high expectations of pupils’ attitudes to learning. Consequently, pupils do not take pride in their work and sometimes lack motivation. Teachers must have high ambitions so that pupils can produce high- quality work and achieve well across the curriculum.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 4 and 5 May 2022

p.4

School details

Inspection number 10227352 Type of school Primary

p.5

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 3 – 4 July 2018, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school is located in Charmouth, close to the towns of Bridport and Lyme Regis in Dorset.  The school is organised into mixed year groups, including a combined Nursery and Reception Year.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  The inspectors carried out deep dives into these subjects: early reading, mathematics and history. The lead inspector also considered science on the second day of the inspection.  For each deep dive, the inspectors met with the curriculum leader and subject leaders, looked at curriculum plans, spoke to teachers and some pupils about their learning, and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Lesson visits were not 4 and 5 May 2022

p.5

6

conducted in the history deep dive but additional evidence was included from other elements of the deep dive.  The inspectors scrutinised individual plans for pupils with SEND to evaluate how well these are being implemented.  The inspectors spoke with different pupils about their personal, social, health and economic education and well-being.  The lead inspector looked at the single central register and checked the school’s systems for monitoring and reporting safeguarding concerns. The lead inspector met with the designated safeguarding lead, who is also the headteacher.  The lead inspector met with the headteacher to discuss the provision for special educational needs in order to help evaluate the effectiveness of SEND provision and practice in the school.  The lead inspector met with a representative school improvement adviser from the local authority.  The inspectors spoke with different staff and met with groups of pupils to find out

p.6

6

what it is like to be a pupil, or to work, in this school.  The lead inspector met with a representative group of governors which included the chair and vice chair of the governing body.  The lead inspector reviewed key documentation, including the school’s self- evaluation form, school action plans, the SEND action plan, and governors’ minutes and monitoring records.  The lead inspector checked survey responses, including those from pupils, staff and parents. This included taking all 57 responses to Ofsted’s free-text service into account.

p.6

Inspection team

Stewart Gale, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Bradley Murray Ofsted Inspector 4 and 5 May 2022

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion