Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
City of London Academy Highbury Grove
Summary
Lisa Strong (lead), Bruce Goddard, Ruth Dollner, Yvonne Chisholm
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
27 Apr 2022
- Inspectors verified
Bruce Goddard, Lisa Strong, Ruth Dollner, Yvonne Chisholm
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
N5 2EQ
- Name on report verified
City of London Academy Highbury Grove
- URN verified
144962
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment18
“Teachers have high expectations of pupils’ uniform, attitudes and work.” p.2Leadership & governance16
“Subject leaders have planned an ambitious curriculum that is broad and balanced.” p.2Progress & outcomes4
“curriculum and the progress they make.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,119
- about usual (typical 1098)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 58, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 12 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 2%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of City of London Academy Highbury Grove 8 Highbury Grove, Islington, London N5 2EQ
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Sixth-form provision Good
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 26 and 27 April 2022
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils feel happy and safe. They said that this was because behaviour in class and around the school has improved. Pupils look out for each other. They enjoy being part of a school community that is so diverse. Pupils appreciate the work the school does to support the local community, for example through the food bank. Pupils collaborate in year groups to raise money for a charity of their choice.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils said that teachers plan and deliver lessons that engage and challenge them. Sixth-form students said that teachers listen to their views. Teachers have high expectations of pupils’ uniform, attitudes and work. Typically, the school is a calm environment in which pupils can learn without disruption. On occasions, pupils feel that teachers give out detentions for relatively minor issues. The school has clamped down on bullying. Pupils said that when they report incidents, these are dealt with swiftly and sensitively. This makes pupils more confident to raise any concerns.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Leaders have developed a comprehensive programme of extra-curricular activities. These happen before and after school. These include sports as well as robotics and electronics.
p.2
better?
Subject leaders have planned an ambitious curriculum that is broad and balanced. They expect all pupils to access this. This extends into the inclusive sixth-form provision. Pupils can choose A-level or vocational courses. They are well guided in making their choices.
p.2
better?
The quality of curricular thinking is consistent across the school. Subject leaders have thought carefully about what they teach and when they teach it. They ensure that this content becomes more challenging over time. For example, in modern foreign languages, pupils learn vocabulary about themselves in Year 7. Year 9 pupils learn more complex language about the environment. Their use of grammar also becomes more sophisticated over time.
p.2
better?
Leaders design the curriculum so that key knowledge and skills are revisited. This helps pupils to remember what they have learned. Teachers regularly employ activities that test pupils’ memory. In the sixth form, teachers set homework based on learning from the previous year. Students find this approach helpful. Teachers expect them to read widely outside lessons.
p.2
better?
Teachers constantly assess pupils’ understanding of the curriculum. They provide written feedback and then pupils redraft their work to make improvements. Extra support is provided to pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). This means that they can complete the same work as their peers. Teachers break down the learning into smaller steps. While the help from most teachers for pupils with SEND is effective, some is not. This affects these pupils’ access to the 26 and 27 April 2022
p.2
3
curriculum and the progress they make. In the sixth form, students practise past questions. Teachers advise them on the best revision strategies to use. Teachers have flexibility to adapt the curriculum to revisit content that pupils have not grasped.
p.3
3
The school assesses pupils’ reading attainment on entry. Large numbers of pupils join the school during the year. Many need extra help with reading. Leaders recognise that face-to-face phonics teaching would be a helpful addition to the support they already provide. Recently, they have developed new strategies to promote reading for pleasure with younger pupils.
p.3
3
Pupils understand the school’s behaviour system. Teachers apply it consistently. Typically, pupils engage well with their learning. On rare occasions, low-level disruption occurs in class. Pupils said that teachers deal with it swiftly.
p.3
3
The school offers a range of extra-curricular activities. Pupils can attend clubs before or after school. They can access leadership opportunities through the student union. Students in Year 12 act as reading mentors for pupils who need extra help. They support staff who are on duty in the playground. In July, pupils in the lower school will take part in ‘activities week’. This includes overseas trips, as well as London- based cultural opportunities.
p.3
3
The personal, social and health education programme is well planned and sequenced. Pupils learn to respect people of other faiths and backgrounds. Older pupils are well prepared for their next steps. They receive impartial careers advice and take part in work experience placements.
p.3
3
Leaders have worked hard to improve the school. Typically, parents and carers said that this is a school that is ‘on the up.’ Staff are proud to work at the school. Leaders support them in their career development. They take account of staff workload and well-being. Governors have a strong understanding of their roles. Leaders know the school well and understand what they need to do to make further improvements.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Pupils learn how to be safe in and out of school as well as online. Teaching about sensitive topics such as consent is age appropriate. Leaders of safeguarding work closely with social services as well as child and adolescent mental health services.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders have provided training for staff on topical safeguarding issues such as peer- on-peer sexual abuse and harassment. They create a culture of vigilance around safeguarding and a belief that, ‘it could happen here’. All staff understand the local contextual safeguarding risks. 26 and 27 April 2022
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Subject leaders plan the curriculum with high ambition for pupils with SEND. This ambition is not met in all lessons because some teachers do not make appropriate adaptations. This affects the progress of a small number of pupils with SEND. Leaders must ensure that their monitoring of classroom provision for pupils with SEND is more robust. Since the COVID-19 pandemic, significant numbers of pupils have found reading more challenging. While leaders provide additional help, this does not include face-to-face phonics instruction. Leaders must ensure that staff are trained to deliver phonics where needed. This will increase reading attainment and enable pupils to access the curriculum more readily.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 26 and 27 April 2022
p.4
provision
Number of pupils on the school roll 1,178
p.5
sixth form
Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected
p.5
Information about this school
The school converted to academy status on 1 December 2017. It is part of the City of London Academies Trust. The school makes use of one registered alternative provider and an on-site alternative provision run by the trust. The school meets the requirements of the Baker Clause, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. 26 and 27 April 2022
p.5
6
This was the first routine inspection the school had received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders, and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors met with several senior staff, including the principal, the leader with responsibility for behaviour and safeguarding, the special educational needs coordinator and other members of the senior team. Inspectors also met with members of the governing body and the trust’s chief executive officer. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: art, English, history, mathematics, modern foreign languages and physical education. For each deep dive, inspectors met with subject leaders, looked at curriculum plans, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors spoke to the leaders of computer science, geography, science and
p.6
6
social sciences. They visited other lessons in personal, social and health education, and physics and psychology. Inspectors spoke to leaders about reading. Inspectors observed behaviour during lessons, at breaktimes and throughout the school day. Inspectors spoke to a range of staff about their views of pupils’ behaviour, and their workload and well-being. Inspectors met with members of the student union group who hold leadership positions in the school. Through conversations with leaders, pupils and staff, inspectors examined the effectiveness of safeguarding. Inspectors looked at records relating to safeguarding, including pre-employment checks and records of work with external agencies. Inspectors considered the views of parents, staff and pupils through Ofsted’s online surveys.
p.6
Inspection team
Lisa Strong, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Ruth Dollner Her Majesty’s Inspector 26 and 27 April 2022
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion