Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
St John's Wood Pre-Preparatory School
Summary
Samantha Ingram (lead), Sophie Healey-Welch
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
17 Mar 2022
- Inspectors verified
Samantha Ingram, Sophie Healey-Welch
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
NW8 7NE
- Name on report verified
St John’s Wood Pre- Preparatory School
- URN verified
101174
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentRequires improvement
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment9
“Across the school, working relationships between teachers and pupils are strong.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 10
- Words of findings
- 1,942
- longer than usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 50, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of St John’s Wood Pre- Preparatory School St John’s Hall, Lord’s Roundabout, London NW8 7NE
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Good Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
Does the school meet the independent school standards?
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils enjoy coming to school. Pupils are kept safe because they are well cared for. They are not worried about bullying and say that any unkindness is sorted out quickly by staff.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Across the school, working relationships between teachers and pupils are strong. Pupils are polite and respect others. They understand that good behaviour means that teachers can teach without interruptions to learning. During lunchtimes, pupils sit sensibly together as they eat their meals. Good manners are expected.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Leaders have high expectations that all pupils will gain success in their 7+ examinations. Children in early years benefit from a nurturing start and a well- considered curriculum. This prepares them well for moving into Year 1. Although older pupils find their learning interesting and enjoyable, the curriculum in some subjects is not planned well enough. As a result, pupils do not develop the coherent understanding in all subjects that they need.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils appreciate the weekly community assemblies in the church. They particularly enjoyed a visit from a dentist and learning about good oral hygiene. They are taught about differences, including that others may have needs or ideas that are not the same as theirs. They learn about people from other backgrounds and cultures. Despite these strengths, other aspects of pupils’ personal development are not planned for well. This includes relationships and sex education (RSE), and health education.
p.2
better?
In early years, children settle well. They are encouraged to become confident and successful learners. In Nursery, they experience a well-planned curriculum that reflects the guidance for the early years foundation stage (EYFS). In Reception, all areas of learning are taught effectively. Staff make sure that children learn to speak confidently, read and write well, and become proficient with numbers up to 10. For example, in Reception, children understand how share objects fairly, using these to practise counting. This helps children to be ready for the work in Year 1 . The school meets the statutory safeguarding and welfare requirements of the EYFS.
p.2
better?
In Reception, phonics is taught carefully using an appropriate programme. Teachers have the relevant training and expertise. Children in early years learn the sounds that letters represent and develop their early reading skills confidently. Although pupils in Years 1 and 2 read daily and are taught phonics, they are not taught using the same programme as children in Reception. This means that they do not build on prior learning . Staff have not had recent training and therefore are not aware of the most recent requirements for the teaching of reading. Incorrect terminology is used by some adults, and this causes some pupils to develop misconceptions when reading aloud. Books used to teach reading are not carefully matched to the sounds 15 to 17 March 2022 that pupils know. As a result, pupils are not building fluency as well as they could. A love of reading, however, is promoted across the school.
p.2
better?
The mathematics curriculum is clear and well organised. The important knowledge that pupils need to learn and remember is identified. It builds carefully from early years through to Year 2. This is broken down into small steps to help understanding. Teachers understand the different needs of their pupils. They check understanding and provide opportunities for pupils to demonstrate their understanding in a variety of ways.
p.3
better?
Leaders have ensured that the range of subjects taught matches what is expected nationally. However, insufficient thought has been given in some subjects to the subject-specific concepts that pupils need to develop. Too much learning is planned in the moment. Lessons are a series of activities, but these are not well sequenced to make sure that pupils are building the core subject knowledge they need. As a result, while they remember some key facts, pupils’ depth of understanding is weaker. For example, in art, pupils copy an artist’s work, but they do not learn and understand the skills the artist used. No overall scheme of work is provided in art. Consequently, the school has not met this area of the independent school standards.
p.3
better?
The needs of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are accurately identified. Staff to support pupils with SEND to access the same learning as their peers. The school complies with schedule 10 of the Equality Act 2010.
p.3
better?
Leaders are committed to providing pupils with the key information they need, for example about keeping safe when online and road safety. However, leaders have not planned an appropriate personal, social and health education (PSHE) curriculum and do not meet their obligations in regard to RSE and health education. The proprietor was unaware that written RSE and health education policies and curriculums are required, or that consultation with parents and carers is also necessary.
p.3
better?
Pupils across the school are encouraged to show respect to adults and to each other, and they do. Adults have clear expectations of behaviour and pupils rise to this.
p.3
better?
Staff are positive regarding the support they receive with their workload. They say that the school is a small, close-knit community, and they all work together.
p.3
better?
The proprietor and the advisory board do not have clear mechanisms in place to ensure that the school meets all the statutory requirements. They do not have sufficient oversight of the independent school standards and, consequently, do not challenge leaders effectively. Similarly, they do not have knowledge and understanding of the school’s curriculum, nor how weaknesses in planning impact pupils’ learning. As a result, they have not prioritised the improvements required. Not all the independent school standards are met. Leaders are, however, compliant with health and safety policies and procedures. They know about their responsibilities for site safety. 15 to 17 March 2022
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.4
Safeguarding
Leaders’ lack of awareness of changes to policy has led to the administrative omission of RSE and health education guidance. Leaders and staff are, however, fully aware of their statutory safeguarding responsibilities, and pupils are safe. An up-to-date safeguarding policy is published on the school’s website.
p.4
Safeguarding
Leaders are aware of the local contextual issues for their school, and all staff have received training to ensure that they are alert to these. They know how to raise concerns, and these are always followed up quickly.
p.4
Safeguarding
While there have been no concerns requiring referral to social care or other external agencies, leaders are not complacent. There is an ‘it could happen here’ philosophy that keeps safeguarding high profile.
p.4
(Information for the school and proprietor)
The mathematics curriculum is thorough and well organised. This allows pupils to secure important knowledge that helps them understand more challenging ideas. This is not the case for other subjects in Years 1 and 2. While pupils access the full curriculum range, leaders must make sure that curriculum thinking is sufficiently detailed for all subjects. They must identify the important concepts that pupils should learn. This must be well sequenced to build pupils’ understanding cumulatively from early years onwards. This will ensure that pupils are developing a deeper understanding of subject-specific content and are able to apply this to future learning. In Reception, children get off to a good start with reading. They are taught by well-trained staff using a phonics programme. This is not the case in Years 1 and 2. Leaders must ensure that the teaching of phonics is consistent across the school, and staff in Years 1 and 2 must have sufficient training to deliver the
p.4
(Information for the school and proprietor)
programme. This will make certain that the teaching of phonics builds on prior learning from Reception, to increase pupils’ reading confidence and fluency. Leaders do not have sufficient awareness or understanding of their statutory responsibilities. They have not made sure that all of the requirements of the independent school standards are met. The proprietor has not established sufficiently robust systems to enable him to challenge and support leaders fully. Consequently, he does not have enough knowledge and understanding about the curriculum that the school provides, nor how this has an impact on pupils’ achievement. The proprietor should ensure that there are more robust systems for assessing, monitoring and evaluating the quality of the school’s education, the implementation of the curriculum and compliance with all of the statutory and regulatory requirements. 15 to 17 March 2022 Leaders do not meet the statutory requirements for RSE and health education.
p.4
(Information for the school and proprietor)
Specific content has not been identified. Parents have not been consulted on what their children will be taught. Leaders should: produce RSE and health education policies identify and produce a clearly sequenced scheme of work for PSHE that meets the current statutory requirements, and then consult with parents ensure that staff are confident to deliver all aspects of the PHSE curriculum put systems in place to assure themselves that the school’s new PHSE curriculum is delivered as planned, so that all pupils access it in full.
p.5
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.5
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.5
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the provider and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted . 15 to 17 March 2022
p.5
School details
Inspection number 10226765 Type of school Other independent school School category Independent school
p.6
Headteacher
David Pilla (Key Stage 1 Association Headteacher) Hetal Shah (EYFS Associate Headteacher) Annual fees (day pupils) £11,985 to £16,680
p.6
Headteacher
Date of previous inspection 15 to 17 May 2018 15 to 17 March 2022
p.6
Information about this school
St John’s Wood Pre-Preparatory School is an independent school that is located in St John’s Wood in the London Borough of Westminster. The school shares the building with St John’s Wood Church. The school is registered to provide full-time education to 124 pupils aged three to seven. There are currently 39 pupils on roll. The school has an exemption in place for early years learning and development standards. However, the school uses the statutory framework for the EYFS, alongside the Montessori philosophy of education in the Nursery. The proprietor is responsible for governance at the school. There are two associate headteachers. No children have an education, health and care plan. The school uses no alternative provision. The school was last inspected in May 2018, when it was judged to be good and all the independent school standards were met.
p.7
Information about this inspection
Inspectors carried out this inspection under section 109(1) and (2) of the Education and Skills Act 2008. The purpose of the inspection is to advise the Secretary of State for Education about the school’s suitability for continued registration as an independent school.
p.7
Information about this inspection
The school has failed to meet the independent school standards. These are the requirements of the schedule to the Education (Independent School Standards) Regulations 2014.
p.7
Information about this inspection
This was the first routine inspection the school had received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders, and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors completed deep dives in these areas of learning: early reading, mathematics, art and design and PSHE. To do this, they met with leaders, had discussions with staff, visited lessons and looked at children’s work. Other subjects were considered as part of this inspection. Inspectors met with the proprietor and a member of the advisory board. An inspector reviewed the arrangements for safeguarding by scrutinising records and through discussions with staff and children. Inspectors also toured the premises and looked at documentation and policies to check compliance with the standards and the requirements of the EYFS statutory framework for safeguarding and welfare.
p.7
Information about this inspection
The views of children, parents and carers, and staff, as gathered through discussions and Ofsted’s surveys, were considered. 15 to 17 March 2022 Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour and checked arrangements for keeping pupils safe at lunchtime. Inspectors scrutinised a range of policies and documents. Inspectors checked the school’s compliance with the independent school standards.
p.7
Inspection team
Samantha Ingram, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.8
Inspection team
Sophie Healey-Welch Her Majesty’s Inspector 15 to 17 March 2022
p.8
Part 1. Quality of education provided
2(1) The standard in this paragraph is met if– – 2(1)(a) the proprietor ensures that a written policy on the curriculum, supported by appropriate plans and schemes of work, which provides for the matters specified in sub-paragraph (2) is drawn up and implemented effectively; and 2A(1) The standard in this paragraph is met if the proprietor– – 2A(1)(e) makes and keeps up to date a separate written statement of its policy with regard to the provision of education as required by each of paragraphs (a) and (b), – 2A(1)(f) consults parents of registered pupils at the school before making or revising a statement under sub-paragraph (e), and – 2A(1)(g) publishes a copy of the statement on a website and provides a copy of the statement free of charge to anyone who asks for one.
p.9
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
34(1) The standard about the quality of leadership and management is met if the proprietor ensures that persons with leadership and management responsibilities at the school– – 34(1)(a) demonstrate good skills and knowledge appropriate to their role so that the independent school standards are met consistently; – 34(1)(b) fulfil their responsibilities effectively so that the independent school standards are met consistently. 15 to 17 March 2022 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council
p.9
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.10
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.10
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.10
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.10
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.10
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion